No its in the manner of turning up at a council meeting, being deemed to be disturbing proceedings and then eventually getting arrested after choosing to ignore repeated warnings.

It has nothing to do with freedom of speech and quite frankly you are talking complete nonsense.

Spoken like a true hippie.

How is that?

Actualy, no.
We just happen to disagree.

The word "nonsense", when translated from Tribesman to plain english means obviouse truth.

Well then why feed the Troll?

Kum bay ya, my Lord, kum bay ya;
Kum bay ya, my Lord, kum bay ya;
Kum bay ya, my Lord, kum bay ya,
O Lord, kum bay ya.

http://mulattodiaries.files.wordpres...racial_400.jpg

Im not personally that interested anymore after i realised that my view will prevail and theirs will not.

The multiculturalists will still do some more damage but the tide is turning clearly, they can accept it or flush out with it.:rock:

Truer words have never been spoken.

Coming from what would appear to be a rather fanatical "aryan" nationalist that is one hell of a compliment. Thank you:up:

The word nonsense means nonsense which is easily demonstrated by taking Nordmanns ridiculous claim and measuring against a similar event in his own country, like the public planning meeting and associated protests over the proposal for a new mosque in Camberley.
Even those nazi scum from the EDL that were protesting were not arrrested for protesting as they kept within the law and more importantly apart from a few initial minor disturbances inside the meeting for which people were warned to stop or leave it all went smoothly with no arrests.


Oh dear, once again August jumps in just to troll in a topic. What a surprise.

It is more than mere disagreement. Ethnic cleansing has a very well defined definition, and you were wrong in the way you used the word. But rather than admitting it you grasp at straws and make things up, things which you cannot even possibly believe yourself. You have even managed to say that the OPPOSITE of ethnic cleansing (co-existence and what you would call "cross-breeding") is "ethnic cleansing".

Im not taking his side because im not sure where he is getting at.

But if we are usually told to protect the native peoples in Asia or Americas coming extinct, why cant he be worried about the Nordic peoples?

We are the native people of our lands!

Or maybe the North European white male is always wrong and should just shut up die fast?

No one is going extinct in Europe. Extinction means that the bloodline dies, that there are no descendants. Even if the future Europeans are darkskinned, they will still have white ancestors. As well as coloured, of course. So even if there aren't any visually white people around in, say, 800 years time, you still can't say white people went extinct, if the bloodline is still there.

Now, if white people were segregated from non-white, and reprocreation was restricted until it finally ceased, then we could talk about extinction.

So even if something doesnt exist it is still not extinct?:hmmm:

And in your scenario everything else would be gone also, culture and language.

But hey, we could read about it in history books so it wouldnt be really gone, right?:doh:

I don't agree with that. A race depends on certain genotypical characteristics. This genotype represents itself in a certain fenotype (the looks). If 'white' men cease to be white, and blue-eyed men cease to have blue eyes, the white blue eyed fenotype is extinct, and thus the white blue eyed genotype is extinct. And thus the white blue eyed Caucasian race will be extinct, cause there are none of the genes left that made the Caucasian race "Caucasian".

With your theory one could say we are all of the black race, because in the end we all come from Africa. Even though Caucasians look totally different from black people.