Sorry for derailing your interesting thread about Climate changes and the propaganda.

Markus

Plant more trees. Have a good day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpvd...channel=Astrum

Markus

Soon there will be no ice left to take probes from for comparison, this will cure the problem for some of the loudest critics of climate change :03:

Seriously, there seems to be a problem – all crises of evolution (meaning a worldwide drop in species numbers) always followed a CO2 rise *, regardless where the latter came from. You can measure this in deep drilling core probes of sediments, not only in ice.
We know where it comes from now anyway. CO2 does not rise because of a worldwide temperature gradient, it used to be the other way round :hmmm:
But whether if we understand it or not, there is not enough done by research and limiting exhaust gases and we and the children will have to live with it. As i understand it it is too late to counter it now anyway.


* edit: With one exception: when the first O2-producing organisms arrived on the world's stage (making use of the overwhelming CO2-saturated atmosphere), the O2 created by them led to a mass extinction of anaerobic life, very early in earth's biological development. O2 was indeed a new and poisonous gas, for them.
In Jurassic times (you know T. Rex and all that) the O2 level was so high that insects with their trachoid respiration could reach enormous (compared to recent time) dimensions, along with other O2-respirating life.

Again: Rising levels of CO2 do not only generate more heat in earth's atmosphere, it is a direct threat to all O2-breathing life.

I don’t deny it, a no ice scenario is a very real possibility. My thoughts however is it’s a naturally occurring phenomena and there isn’t a damn thing you can do about it other than to adapt. What have corporations or governments achieved? They have raised taxes (you have to ask yourself what has government ever fixed by raising taxes?), the cost of energy has skyrocketed because of stupid ideas, destroyed the environment even further and condemn third world poor to slavery to dig their goblin ore. And the sloganeering has everybody ignorant of it or if confronted believe the death and suffering of others is worth it.

This is utter fookin’ climate change fanboy nonsense. But it’s what happens when people stop thinking.

https://youtu.be/owJ8aOBvEv0?feature=shared

https://i.postimg.cc/rFJxNRSM/IMG-2755.jpg

We really need to make those people allergic to air.

That was a great video Markus. :up:

Yes indeed ! :salute:

At or around 11:20 he shows a graph which appears to shows how quickly global temperatures are changing. However what he failed to mention. It’s during that same period 1950’s or so onward we began and continue to increase the number monitoring stations around the globe. So yes, I think you will find a dramatic increase in a short period of time as stations are placed in climates that were never monitored before particularly hotter arid areas. I might be mistaken but I don’t think the graph represents global average either, I think it actually shows temperature anomalies.

I would agree the Milankovitch cycle not being a major contributor. But there are other factors he didn’t touch on such as increased solar activity the last fifty years Solar winds and radiation, changes in the magnetosphere, mantle convection which may be contributing to a surge methane. Mantle plumes warming oceans and arctic cap. In addition to further death & destruction caused by lobbyists saving the planet leading to even further deforestation, excavation, slavery digging up the goblin ore.

As far as I now Milankovic cycles are following CO2 peaks, whatever caused them. Volcanoes and plate tectonics (Deccan trapps etc.) are usually used for explanation, as well as the rise of plants producing toxic O2 gases for the primoridal anaerobic organisms, thus producing O2 out of CO2 and making CO2 levels fall (and thus decreasing atmospheric temperatures). Still, we know what caused the recent CO2 rise (century-wise) if we do not put our heads in the sand.

Putting up of monitoring stations gives us exact numbers for detailed dates, but this is not really useful when you want to compare it with more general numbers found in sediments of some million years ago.
On the other hand you have detailed temperature and atmospheric data of a certain day or even hour in the jurassic for example (like a coral calcite piece having been turned around during a storm back then with all kinds of other data), but even this does not give us clues of the overall situation of this particular year. You can only use deep drilling cores for getting a general picture :hmmm:

Talk about the potential for climate change. If it hits, so much for all the solar and wind farms. We’ll be going right back to using oil coal and wood. :D



NASA predicts large asteroid impact could be in Earth’s future

BY BILL SHANNON - 09/20/23 7:14 AM ET


https://thehill.com/homenews/space/4...earths-future/

September 23rd
 

So what's going to happen tomorrow?

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2023/09/2...ons-take-over/

^ if i see a Pteranodon tomorrow it would make me happy ;)
But then I just found out the beer reserves are dry and it's sunday tomorrow.
Doooom :wah:

I know what's going to happen
An artificiel moon will approach Earth tomorrow Afternoon CEST
:har:
Markus