SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Gun Control thread (merged many)

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)

- - Gun Control thread (merged many) (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203106)

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyJWest (Post 2384456)

Arm bears!

:huh:

GUN THE BEARS!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nippelspanner (Post 2384404)

I disagree on that.
Also, I can't think of a single member here who said that, let alone "a large group".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly (Post 2384407)

I haven't seen anyone in awhile saying that the solution is banning all guns. :06:

I'm not sure if it's a language problem or a viewpoint problem.

Then I said "here" I meant the United States, not SubSim. Think of it that way and maybe you'll begin to see the connection.

Quote:

In 2013, cars killed "only" 168 people more compared to firearms

It doesn't matter if it's twice as many or half as many. If the only solution to the gun death problem is to ban all guns (as so many here in the United States claim), then why don't they also claim that only solution for the car death problem is to ban all cars? Goose and Gander?

Do you see the connection now?

I took control and purchased a gun before the control said I could no longer purchase a gun. I replaced the original stock with a tactical adjustable stock and added a tactical light. Then purchased 100 rounds and plan on purchasing more.

Bring on the zombies.

Bacon anyone?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 2384466)

I'm not sure if it's a language problem or a viewpoint problem.

Then I said "here" I meant the United States, not SubSim. Think of it that way and maybe you'll begin to see the connection.

That was indeed a language related problem, my apologies.

Quote:

I can see the connection, as you put it and I paraphrase, from the American POV.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betonov (Post 2384416)

You may want to rethink :O:
https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...75&oe=57644AFB

Get on my bad side and I'll give you her adress :haha:

Consider me on your good side then.:) She certainly looks formidable with the assault rifle. Dowly has " dibs " on her anyhow as he has said she is his type. :)

With her red hair and the rifle, I'm wondering if she was the inspiration for the rock group " guns and roses " taking their name :O:

Quote:

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk (Post 2384467)

Bacon anyone?

GUN THE BACON!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 2384517)

GUN THE BACON!

Yes! :yeah:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7UW5AkWqOY

When is the pain gunna stop?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Commander Wallace (Post 2384379)

To answer this, If someone makes the choice to have a weapon in their home for protection or sport or any other number of valid reasons, They have an ethical, moral and of course legal responsibility to make sure the weapons in question are secured. If you have a child or children, then the gun owner may want to reevaluate the merits of having a weapon at home or elect to either get rid of the weapons or take increased actions to make sure they are secured. Again, it's a question of accountability and being a responsible gun owner.

Should the parent be held responsible ? In most jurisdictions, sanctions in the form of the filing of criminal charges will most likely be filed for failing to secure the weapon used. It's simple, if you have weapons which are relatively expensive to own, invest the same amount of money to make sure they are secure.

This is a different matter relative to holding a legally authorized gun manufacturer or seller legally responsible for a death or accident once it has left their respective factory or store and beyond their control.

Thanks for the answer :salute:

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 2384519)

Yes! :yeah:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7UW5AkWqOY

Hey, guns and bacon is all part of a complete and nutricious American breakfast :
http://i.imgur.com/AsWCqaI.jpg?1

:D

[QUOTE=HunterICX;2384567]Thanks for the answer :salute:

You are more than welcome. :salute: It was a good question. It's also one the courts have grappled with for some time.

Damn that looks good.
And I wouldnt say no to the food either.

I would, that stuff looks nasty! And lobster for breakfast is just not American! :)

This is more like it (think of the guns being present, just not in the picture.)

http://www.greensiderestaurant.com/w...-greenside.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by HunterICX (Post 2384567)

Thanks for the answer :salute:

Hey, guns and bacon is all part of a complete and nutricious American breakfast :
http://i.imgur.com/AsWCqaI.jpg?1

:D

I especially like the toast Jesus :D

.

I recall talk of political correctness gone mad in America, and how some university lecturers were advised against mentioning certain subjects for fear of the reaction of the students.

I see what you mean now:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...debate-n525096