SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   I thought Iraq didn't have any WMD (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=197351)

Mr Quatro 06-12-14 11:27 AM

These guys are after more than some Shiite women ... the ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) just stole $425,000,000 in cash after they ran the Iraq army off:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/06/12/isis-just-stole-425-million-and-became-the-worlds-richest-terrorist-group/

Quote:

the most lasting impact as Iraq descends into a possible civil war is that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria just got extremely rich.
As insurgents rolled past the largest city in northern Iraq, an oil hub at the vital intersection of Syria, Iraq and Turkey, and into Tikrit, several gunmen stopped at Mosul’s central bank. An incredible amount of cash was reportedly on hand, and the group made off with 500 billion Iraqi dinars — $425 million.

mapuc 06-12-14 12:28 PM

To Skybird and Tribesman thank you for your explanation about Petrodollar

Have been reading some of the posting in this thread and when I saw the word "petrodollar"

This popped up in my mind

(from wiki)
"Some assert that the Iraq war which began on March 19, 2003, was a result of Iraq's abandonment of the petrodollar system in 2002, in favor of a "PetroEuro" "

That's why I asked my question

Markus

Wolferz 06-12-14 01:07 PM

One step closer to Armageddon.:dead:

MH 06-12-14 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skybird (Post 2215812)

The author discusses why the two states solution is idiotic, the "peace process" is a Western self-deception, and that the one state solution is the only way. I fully agree.

What do you know...
You may have them , they just might immigrate to Germany lol.

PA as autonomy(which it is right know) with some adjustments is the best solution for now.



Quote:

All this reflects back onto Israel's security situation as well, and stupid Westerners still argue that if only Israel would agree to destroy itself by allowing Palestinians to take it over, all would be good in the ME (since the civil war between Sunni and Shia powers is just a myth propagated by Islamophobes anyway). For them, this little piece (in German):
I can somewhat agree with that....getting ME to civilize it self would help Palestinian cause a lot.
I would love to have Dutch as neighbors lol.

Oberon 06-12-14 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolferz (Post 2215865)
One step closer to Armageddon.:dead:

Nah, they've still got a bit further to go to get to Meggido, wrong country for a start.

Armistead 06-12-14 05:38 PM

Well, it looks like Iraq is going to hell big time. Those radical insurgents will soon be in Baghdad... We have failed again, leaving a possible big mess....over 4000 dead soldiers...for what?

Wolferz 06-12-14 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Armistead (Post 2215921)
Well, it looks like Iraq is going to hell big time. Those radical insurgents will soon be in Baghdad... We have failed again, leaving a possible big mess....over 4000 dead soldiers...for what?

So Dubya could hang his "Mission Accomplished" banner and act like he actually did something.:88)

Dread Knot 06-12-14 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolferz (Post 2215923)
So Dubya could hang his "Mission Accomplished" banner and act like he actually did something.:88)

After what happened last year in Syria, I don't expect to see Obama painting any red lines in the sand. :O:

It's a frustrating spot to be in, regardless of blame. There is absolutely no course of action of which I can conceive that will not engender tremendous political backlash from some corner in the short term and probably in the long term as well.

Do nothing? Hah. What a rudderless, impotent foreign policy you have.
Do something? Hah. What an arrogant imperialist meddler you are.
Do something military? Oh My Gaawwd! Throwing away lives to prop up a failed state!

Tribesman 06-12-14 05:54 PM

Quote:

all would be good in the ME (since the civil war between Sunni and Shia powers is just a myth propagated by Islamophobes anyway)
I am interested in the validity of the propogation of this myth, I am unaware of it being held much by anyone with even only the most basic knowledge.
However I am aware it exists in certain quarters. It would be by the sort of person who would claim that Iran is a Sunni country, or the sort of person who claimed that there is only one sort of muslim and that they are all from a 19th century offshoot.

I wonder if Skybird can provide confirmation of some people saying such things, or if it would be necessary to simply quote him saying it all himself:hmmm:

Quote:

The author discusses why the two states solution is idiotic, the "peace process" is a Western self-deception, and that the one state solution is the only way. I fully agree.
I do like your links. So President Bush should be made dictator for life, Iraq should be emptied of its population and resettled by Americans, America
should engineer a war to take over the middle east and its oil:har:
Interesting on the one state solution though. Several options available there
Option one. Expel all the unwanted population and take all the land.
Option two. Keep all the unwanted population and take all the land but deny that population any rights.
Option three. Keep all the unwanted population and take all the land but lose power through becoming a minority.

All three options will undoubtably lead to the one state disappearing...yet Skybird is in favour of it, why does he hate Israel so much? I thought he only hated the Muslims?
There is of course option four. Genocide.
Now who in their right mind would be in favour of genocide?:hmmm:
I am sure I can find a quote from someone who is in favour of genocide, I wonder if it would be that Skybird fellow again providing the material?

August 06-12-14 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolferz (Post 2215923)
So Dubya could hang his "Mission Accomplished" banner and act like he actually did something.:88)

Except that he didn't actually hang that banner, or have it hung, and in any case for the next 5 years of his presidency afterwards he didn't stop doing what he could to improve the situation. He didn't cut and run from it like the present president seems wont to do.

Dread Knot nails it though. No choice is without criticism and none are easy to dismiss because each one involves a real cost in blood for somebody both immediately and down the road.

nikimcbee 06-12-14 06:55 PM

Quote:

After what happened last year in Syria, I don't expect to see Obama painting any red lines in the sand. :O:
Only in the golf sand trap.

Tribesman 06-12-14 07:19 PM

Quote:

Except that he didn't actually hang that banner, or have it hung, and in any case for the next 5 years of his presidency afterwards he didn't stop doing what he could to improve the situation.
Errrrrr..... He created the situation, he made the mess.
You supported creating the situation, you still repeat the same old lies on which the situation was created.
There is no merit in a failed attempt at improving a situation that you needlessly created in the first place.
Avoiding the situation or ensuring that you didn't make a complete mess of it in the first place would be worthy of merit, but those achievements are entirely absent from the Bush Presidency

Quote:

He didn't cut and run from it like the present president seems wont to do.
Cut and run?
Its a strange sort of patriot that would have wanted their president to accept the SOFA dictated by Tehran which was offered to the US.
Why do you hate America August?

Mr Quatro 06-12-14 08:05 PM

ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria)?

Aren't these same group of terrorist fighting in Syria alongside other loose groups ... the same ones we are sending men to train and small arms to in Jordan?

The same group that Senator McCain supports backing?

The same group that Syria is fighting backed by Russia and Iran?

If the USA won't help out ... maybe Iraq's old enemy Iran will fill the void?

Tribesman 06-13-14 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Quatro (Post 2215955)
ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria)?

Aren't these same group of terrorist fighting in Syria alongside other loose groups ... the same ones we are sending men to train and small arms to in Jordan?

No. it is a three way split with each fighting the other two

Quote:

The same group that Senator McCain supports backing?
No. That would be one of the three

Quote:

The same group that Syria is fighting backed by Russia and Iran?

Yes.

Quote:

If the USA won't help out ... maybe Iraq's old enemy Iran will fill the void
They already are.
The Iranian based SCIRII with the Al-Badr became the dominant power in Iraq, and as Skybird mentioned, Al Sadr is back in the game following his re-education in Iran.

Armistead 06-13-14 04:33 AM

ISIS or the group it came from basically rose back from the ashes due to we removed out intelligent forces.

Just think when they take over our billion dollar embassy. Hell, it's a fortress, you think we would defend it...instead of leave.

I always believed Iraq to be a blunder, it takes a dictator like Saddam to keep a nation like Iraq under control, but leaving as we did will be a bigger blunder than the war itself.....


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.