![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Want to continue your "wise" talk from last time, about how there's no specific implication on the immediate future when getting a) drunken b) stoned c) swarmed by ho's (as the Americans like to say, or something), , Smartass? I would like to put the :cheers: smilie up here now, but I can't find it. ;) Anyway, I need to leave now again to work on all of the above, so that at some point I may be as cool as as you are, "DarkFish". Cheers buddy. :woot: |
Quote:
:haha: Oktoberfest obviously left its mark :cool: |
Quote:
Cuz this is your proposition: Quote:
Just 3 words and everything is magically solved!:woot: |
Quote:
Quote:
I don't get exactly what "wise talk" in which I said it doesn't you're talking about though...:hmmm: Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
It was based upon the false notion that all ideas are on the table or even formulated at all times along with being technologically feesible, and that all lawmakers have to do is select from those ideas. In the real world, however, not all options are at all times already formulated as practical, workable ideas. Try to be wise next time you try to accuse one of not being such. Or, at least, try not to be so obviously unwise. Quote:
Any sales tax would raise money. How much it would raise would be dependent upon the percentage of the tax and the volume of consumer spending. However, I was not making any argument for the idea but rather I was saying that I would be in favor of it. Your responses are still pointless and make little sense. Again, for the third time, why WOULDN'T a national sales tax be able to raise as much money as an income tax? Are you so incredibly obtuse as to not understand that how much raised would depend upon the rate and the consumer buying power? Furthermore, it would allow for previous untaxable funds to actually see taxation (really, you thought of this, right?). As such, it could quite possibly raise revenues. In any case, it would be a completely fair tax. Here, if you want to study it further (I suspect you don't and you're just trying to be obnoxious), a link to a starting point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairTax Quote:
What, if I say I would prefer tennis shoes over loafers should I write a 10 page dissertation explaining why, when it is only slightly relevant to the topic at hand? Really, dude, you can't be serious, because even Tribesman wouldn't use such stupidity veiled rhetoric as an "argument" as you have. |
Quote:
Oh sorry I forgot, you and Rush both get lost understanding that word:rotfl2: |
Quote:
http://www.purecostumes.com/mm5/grap...0655_mid_1.jpg |
:hmmm:
I just googled "hot guys oktoberfest" and got http://www.sauerkrautcelebs.com/wp-c...ktoberfest.jpg and http://www.destination-munich.com/im...h-2010-men.jpg and http://www2.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/O...AAva3wei_l.jpg :damn: |
Quote:
Obsession isn't healthy you know. I just hope that we're clothed in your dreams, but your teenage-like propensity for chasing us around the proverbial school yard with the same tired, innane, antagonistic remarks punctuated with the usual assortment of smilies suggests otherwise. :yep: Oh wait, I forgot - you might not understand without a :har::har::har::har::har::har: |
@Aramike
As you wish dude!! Have fun in reinventing the whole society. :sunny: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But you know, you're absolutely right, your ideas are undoubtedly the best. :yep: |
Quote:
Dude, seriously? Are you trying to be taken seriously? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? I mean, really, you haven't supported a single thing you've either posited or alluded to. Do you have an actual REASON why I would be wrong? Do you have an alternative? Do you have ANYTHING substantive to add to the discussion? My concept of a flat tax is merely a preference and alternative to what we have now. It is not a question of right or wrong; it is a question of trying to streamline the process for the sake of efficiency and fairness. It is my OPINION that this would work. You have offered NOTHING as a counter point. In fact, your responses are nothing more than one-liners implying that my idea must be wrong without any reason as to WHY is must be wrong. In fact, I suspect that any outside party would see you as someone who has not even the first clue about what's being discussed. For the fourth time, why wouldn't a sales tax be able to raise "enough"? Or are you simply unable to answer the question? Also, with the so-called "drastic changes" I suggest, why would it reinvent society? Or do you not know, but you just "feel" it might? Do you even know what the word "society" means, or do you just hear it repeated on talk radio so much that you feel that every alternative to any governmental norm must relate to society? Really, unless you insist upon portraying yourself as a mental midget in a grow-up's discussion you should try a simpler topic or come prepared with meaningful responses. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.