![]() |
Quote:
So being against the popular opinion is trolling now? And i'd still like to see why you attribute me so some long gone (Presumibly unpopular) member, as if only one person would be stupid/dickish enough to defend this evil DRM monster, and that the valient subsim internet discussion boards are united in their rightous indignation and resolve. Cant my IP be checked or something if this person was banned? Being accused of being someone else is the only thing i'm annoyed with so far, and i am not angry at any one of you, honestly. |
what you going do when they take the servers down and you cant play and they will take the servers down least with sh1 to uboat missions we could play for years and get our money worth and enjoy the games,and personly i dont buy it when they said they are not making money if they wasnt making money they wouldnt do another game,I dont mind doing a online verifcation one time online to play a game that i pay for.and way ubi been releasing half done games they should pay the modders for making the games better.
|
I'm pretty sure Sh3 and SH4 used to have DRM as well, usually they remove it with a patch after a certain amount of time, right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
NO....SH3 DRM (starforce) screwed up so many computers (CDROM drives stopped working) Ubi removed it because of the Ticked off customers.... seems UBI didnt learn thier lesson. In fact a MAJOR selling point Ubi used with SH 4 is that It DID NOT have the same DRM as SH 3. Edit: martes is right.... Starforce was not a DRM but a copy protection scheme (a piss poor one at that) that installed a program you couldnt see or manually uninstall. Ubi..while not officially removing it...did distribute the link to the program to uninstall Starforce, and promised the next SH would not have it. |
I remember SH3 Messing up when it detected my virtual drives back in the day, Today i have it (GWX3) on my laptop and it doesnt conflict any more.
I confess to being completely wrong on this front, but i cant imagine that all copies of Sh5 will become worthless data when the servers are pulled, im sure they will think of something. All anger aside do you honestly see that happening? |
I think (hope) they'll do the right thing in time, but the whole concept is wrong at its heart. A lot of us can't play the game at all.
|
So what makes for the total reliability on my end and the end of everyone i know? I honestly cannot fathom why we would have two completely differant experiances with the same exact program. I'm only arguing for the concept of the always-online DRM, failings do not allow paying customers to play their game are of course unforgivable, but i dont think writing off a promising program and concept is needed for a few teething problems. Again, on paper it looks like a great idea, and it works fine for me.
If it matters: Nvidia 8600GT 512 2.8GHZ Pentium D dual core 64 bit 4 Gigs of ram, 3 usable (Thanks Vista 2, aka 7) Windows 7 64 bit ultimate edition. Sh5 Cheap edition: Bought on steam 2 days after release. Comcast Digital Cable: South florida ISP. |
Quote:
Take curtain Digital music stores that had DRM on their music. those server have now been turned off. and people that downloaded music from those stores can no longer listen to the music that they have bought.:nope: |
Quote:
What saddens me is the fact that the measures taken are no longer sufficient which begs the question....why bother in the first place? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sometimes when facing evil people, difficult, far-fetched and unlikely efforts need to be made in the name of the law. :rock: (yes, Pirates = Hitler) Get back to me in a month or two, if the server issues are not taken care of by than for this again, brand new online system (these problems are nothing compared to the 2003-2004 Public Steam beta) i will admit defeat. No amount of testing can recreate a public launch, and problems are bound to pop up, All i was suggesting is that a forum like this is not an accurate measure of the problems of the greater, un-registered subsim community, and that the complaining was getting a little extreme Heres the only way i can prove im not a douche troll and that i want to be a productive member of the subsim community: Mods, i've gotten my point across as best i could, please lock this thread. |
Wont modding the campaign render the whole DRM useless??? :hmmm:
I mean, the only thing keeping pirates form playing the game is the fact that the campaign does not work the way it should if cracked and not connected to UBI. I´m pretty sure once the mods are released, almost nobody will play the stock campaign. So, what´s the point in UBI maintaining expensive servers for the sake of stoping piracy (as they claim)? I´m almost sure the headstaff there got stoned or something. Also, I doubt there will be LOTS of patches, I actualy think UBI released the game as it is hoping to get "free work" form the modder comunity. At some point, patches will not be released anymore and there will be no more PRATICAL use to be connected (in costumers point of view). Sure, there still will be the "you can install the game in X number of PCs and use your save games" (I dont realy care for this feature, I can allways copy my savegames to a pendrive and carry it with me anywhere I want, so it´s kinda redundant). I really think this whole DRM thing is pointless. But it´s only my opinion. |
Most people do not mod their games, most people do not go on the internet and talk about games on forums. There is no expectation for anti-piracy measures to be 100% effective or undefeatable, that should not be expected of a software. Its like blaming the police for a murder because it wasnt effective enough to stop it, which i suppose some people would do.
Again mods, lock this thread, i wont shut up until you do :) |
Quote:
And you called my arguement ridiculous. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.