Sailor Steve |
09-08-11 02:50 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hottentot
Not trying to sound insulting, but as someone studying museology as a minor subject, someone who has worked in a museum and someone who intends to one day become a professional on the field, I'm just confused by how wrong that all sounded.
|
Ah, now I understand. Well, here is the problem. The museum is at an Air Force Base, the main part is real airplanes, not models. Of course the real planes are limited in number, and are all American.
The workers are mostly retired mechanics. They can fix an F-16 blindfolded, but most of them have no clue what a S.P.A.D. 13 or a Fairey Fulmar was. Their expertise is limited to the real planes, and the model cases were neglected for a long time. So they needed a couple of guys who love to study the history.
I thought it was funny that Hill AFB was named for Major Ployer P. Hill, who died flying the Boeing 299, the prototype B-17, but the only model they had in the case labelled "Planes Major Hill Flew" was the Revell B-17F. They had a "professional" modelbuilder who was constructing Academy's new B-17C model tell them that the prototype just "couldn't be done". So I built one for them (actually I was already working on it) in time for the Base's 50th anniversary celebration in June 1990. So now the in the entrance to the indoor part of the museum is this (sorry for the poor quality of the pictures, but they were taken with a cheap camera twenty-one years ago).
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...teve/299-5.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...teve/299-3.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...teve/299-2.jpg
|