![]() |
Quote:
:damn::damn::damn: |
Worked at Taranto - and gave the Japanese all the ideas they needed for a little inlet in Oahu, too.
|
Quote:
|
So its time to crunch the numbers because they never lie when it comes to basic aerodynamics.
F-14 vs F-15 number crunching showdown. Source wikipedia Specifications (F-15C Eagle) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...le_drawing.png http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-1234S-017.jpg http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png Front view of an F-15C with the conformal FAST PACK fuel tanks on the trailers http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...le_drawing.png http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png F-15A Eagle's weapon loadout, which is similar to F-15C's config. Data from USAF fact sheet,[93] Jane's All the World's Aircraft[94] Combat Legend, F-15 Eagle and Strike Eagle[95] General characteristics
Specifications (F-14D) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-14_Tomcat.png http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...F14_2_Wiki.jpg http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png F-14A, VF 111 "Sundowners" (USS Carl Vinson) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...F14Missile.jpg http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png An F-14D launches an AIM-7 Sparrow. A GBU-24 Paveway III can also be seen being carried. Data from U.S. Navy file,[80] Spick,[28] M.A.T.S.[81] General characteristics
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In a pinch they can also be used to transport people... :O: |
Quote:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/pict...pictureid=3389 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.tim-beach.com/shore01/hunter.jpg ^ Miss Demeanour |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Shaddup... :O: (I always forget about trim... :damn:) |
Regarding the F-14 vs F-15 argument I found that the wing loading for the F-14 is as follows
F-14A 92 pounds per square foot F-14A+\B 94 F-14D 96 That is an impressively low wing loading for an aircraft its size and goes along way to explain its agility in a knife fight. I cant find data for the F-15!:damn: Anybody? Also I wanted to point out that allot of the F-14's reputation for being a dog comes from its flight restrictions imposed on it by the navy. Apparently those first generation engines on the A model were famous for compressor stalls at high alpha flight and with the wide spacing it could induce a flat spin (Top Gun style) So the aircrafts pilots were limited for safety's sake in high alpha flight. With the A+ B and D models the restrictions were removed. Now the problem with that is that the A+ B and D models combined still only made up 20% of all Tomcats! Most were poor engined A models up to the end. |
I found:
"The wing loading value is around 56 pounds per square foot of effective lifting surface." for the F-15E http://www.f-15e.info/joomla/en/tech...frame/64-wings But, "The F-15 wing was designed to be optimal for dogfighting at transonic and high subsonic speeds" ...giving the low speed maneuvering edge to the F-14. |
Quote:
Wing loading: 73.1 lb/ft² (358 kg/m²) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.