SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   F-14, F-15, F-16, F-18 who's da boss thread. (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=177681)

Jimbuna 12-12-10 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1552565)
Why not its the best the British have right now... :O:

You may well be right :DL


:damn::damn::damn:

Growler 12-12-10 10:11 PM

Worked at Taranto - and gave the Japanese all the ideas they needed for a little inlet in Oahu, too.

TLAM Strike 12-12-10 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Growler (Post 1552647)
Worked at Taranto ...

... during the Channel Dash... not so much...

Freiwillige 12-12-10 11:52 PM

So its time to crunch the numbers because they never lie when it comes to basic aerodynamics.

F-14 vs F-15 number crunching showdown.

Source wikipedia

Specifications (F-15C Eagle)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...le_drawing.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-1234S-017.jpg http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png
Front view of an F-15C with the conformal FAST PACK fuel tanks on the trailers


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...le_drawing.png http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png
F-15A Eagle's weapon loadout, which is similar to F-15C's config.


Data from USAF fact sheet,[93] Jane's All the World's Aircraft[94] Combat Legend, F-15 Eagle and Strike Eagle[95]
General characteristics
Performance
Armament

Avionics


Specifications (F-14D)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-14_Tomcat.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...F14_2_Wiki.jpg http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png
F-14A, VF 111 "Sundowners" (USS Carl Vinson)


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...F14Missile.jpg http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/...gnify-clip.png
An F-14D launches an AIM-7 Sparrow. A GBU-24 Paveway III can also be seen being carried.


Data from U.S. Navy file,[80] Spick,[28] M.A.T.S.[81]
General characteristics
Performance
Armament

Avionics

More on these two soon!:salute:

krashkart 12-12-10 11:57 PM

Quote:

MXU-648 Cargo/Travel Pod - to carry personal belongings, and small pieces of maintenance equipment.
How much hooch will fit in there? :D

TLAM Strike 12-13-10 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krashkart (Post 1552672)
How much hooch will fit in there? :D

Quite a bit, IIRC it started life as a 300 gal fuel tank. :hmmm:

In a pinch they can also be used to transport people... :O:

krashkart 12-13-10 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1552674)
Quite a bit, IIRC it started life as a 300 gal fuel tank. :hmmm:

In a pinch they can also be used to transport people... :O:

Those who dare... :DL

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/pict...pictureid=3389

Jimbuna 12-13-10 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krashkart (Post 1552675)

How cool is that :rock::DL

Oberon 12-13-10 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1552674)
Quite a bit, IIRC it started life as a 300 gal fuel tank. :hmmm:

In a pinch they can also be used to transport people... :O:

I've heard of that too, the chap who owns "Miss Demeanour'" or the 'Zoom lolly' as it's also known, keeps his change of clothes and any overnight gear in one of his tanks. I presume though that a balancing act has to be done with the weight in the tanks or the aircraft would develop a roll to port or starboard.

http://www.tim-beach.com/shore01/hunter.jpg

^ Miss Demeanour

Growler 12-13-10 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna (Post 1552781)
How cool is that :rock::DL

Indulging in Dr.-Strangelove-ian fantasies has never been cooler.:DL

TLAM Strike 12-13-10 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1552798)
I've heard of that too, the chap who owns "Miss Demeanour'" or the 'Zoom lolly' as it's also known, keeps his change of clothes and any overnight gear in one of his tanks. I presume though that a balancing act has to be done with the weight in the tanks or the aircraft would develop a roll to port or starboard.

http://www.tim-beach.com/shore01/hunter.jpg

^ Miss Demeanour

Or it could just trim the aircraft to compensate.

Oberon 12-13-10 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike (Post 1552839)
Or it could just trim the aircraft to compensate.

....

Shaddup... :O:

(I always forget about trim... :damn:)

Freiwillige 12-13-10 12:50 PM

Regarding the F-14 vs F-15 argument I found that the wing loading for the F-14 is as follows

F-14A 92 pounds per square foot
F-14A+\B 94
F-14D 96

That is an impressively low wing loading for an aircraft its size
and goes along way to explain its agility in a knife fight.

I cant find data for the F-15!:damn:

Anybody?

Also I wanted to point out that allot of the F-14's reputation for being a dog comes from its flight restrictions imposed on it by the navy. Apparently those first generation engines on the A model were famous for compressor stalls at high alpha flight and with the wide spacing it could induce a flat spin (Top Gun style) So the aircrafts pilots were limited for safety's sake in high alpha flight.

With the A+ B and D models the restrictions were removed. Now the problem with that is that the A+ B and D models combined still only made up 20% of all Tomcats! Most were poor engined A models up to the end.

MaddogK 12-13-10 03:39 PM

I found:
"The wing loading value is around 56 pounds per square foot of effective lifting surface." for the F-15E
http://www.f-15e.info/joomla/en/tech...frame/64-wings

But,
"The F-15 wing was designed to be optimal for dogfighting at transonic and high subsonic speeds"

...giving the low speed maneuvering edge to the F-14.

Sailor Steve 12-13-10 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freiwillige (Post 1552875)
Regarding the F-14 vs F-15 argument I found that the wing loading for the F-14 is as follows

F-14A 92 pounds per square foot
F-14A+\B 94
F-14D 96

That is an impressively low wing loading for an aircraft its size
and goes along way to explain its agility in a knife fight.

I cant find data for the F-15!:damn:

It was right there in the middle of all the crap you copied-and-pasted. Didn't you even read it?

Wing loading: 73.1 lb/ft² (358 kg/m²)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.