![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/6842/534543j.jpg Somewhere there? EDIT: Can't see any subs though... Meanwhile in Seoul: http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/t...s/f77ae6fa.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Actually interesting images now that I look at them Obie.
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6931/csg73.jpg Little short of the 200 km range reported on the HY-2, but in the reported range of the Turbojet HY-4 SSM (300 to 500 km)... :hmmm: http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7...lkwormsite.jpg Silkworm site my friends and I found in detail http://img222.imageshack.us/i/silkwormsite.jpg |
This is interesting if it's true.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/8...th-korea-leak/ Come to think of it ,it could make things worse there - North Korea does listen to China sometimes ,but if they think that China's ready to dump them, then they might start thinking "why should we listen to them" and just go ahead with whatever they want.... |
I think it's safe to assume SSN23 is still in town as well as at least one 688/774 attached to CSG-73. That's the floor.
TLAM, how does your mapmaker know where CSG-73 is in the Yellow Sea? Do you know if they've stayed outside the EEZ? |
Quote:
|
Come on, it'll be interesting to know if they crossed that line because the Chinese have more or less given us that option to save face for both sides.
|
Quote:
I read that too. Interesting stuff. But NK doesn't have a lot of options here. If they loose Chinas backing, they're sunk. |
Quote:
Look closely at the photo Oberon Posted. http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/7272/610xsiedit.jpg BTW I think the USS Houston SSN 713 is in the area. She pulled in to Chinhae on the 23. One of the Ohios surfaced in Korea late last month plus one in Guam. Plus I bet the ROKN has a one or two of those smart little AIP boats of theirs out and about, maybe a JMSDF sub out their too. |
Good point. Now that I think about it, the EEZ olive branch is probably a red herring anyways. The ROK/DPRK would get to claim up to the halfway point as its own EEZ. We didn't need to cross that line after the Cheonan and we don't now either... and the presence of a carrier east of that line isn't any less threatening to Beijing.
|
Thought you'd like it TLAM :03: Good find on the Silkworms and HY-4s. With the CSG (I always want to write CVBG still :wah:) close to the ROK coast down there, I imagine that most ROK radars would pick it up and be able to issue a raid warning to the CSG enabling them to switch on all their CIWS gear long in advance, as well as have a clear indication of the direction of the threat...in fact they could probably turn the group to face the incoming missile to reduce RCS.
The DPRK would have to be more crazy than it is to try and attack the CSG, particularly at that range. If they were up by Incheon, that sort of parallel, then yes, I'd say there was a risk, but down there...not so much of a risk. Still going to annoy China but judging from the latest wikileaks, China is annoyed enough at the DPRK already, they just hide it well. |
Quote:
|
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11887236
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.