| Sea Demon |
11-15-07 02:05 PM |
Note also how Morison leaves himself a liferaft for his own future credibility. Using words like "may well be" doesn't sound too sure himself. Gee Mr. Patient, you have a small headache.....let's do major brain surgery just in case its out of control brain hemorrhage. That's basically the direction the enviro-movement wants us to take. No thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradclark1
Quote:
Sea Demon
NASA says Arctic does an about face on circulation levels.......
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-131
Doesn't bode well for the "climate disaster" crowd at all. This isn't what the enviros predicted would happen here. In other words, skepticism on global doom and gloom is totally warranted.
|
Still can't read beyond what you want to see. Further down you will see:
Quote:
Morison cautioned that while the recent decadal-scale changes in the circulation of the Arctic Ocean may not appear to be directly tied to global warming, most climate models predict the Arctic Oscillation will become even more strongly counterclockwise in the future. "The events of the 1990s may well be a preview of how the Arctic will respond over longer periods of time in a warming world," he said.
|
Actually no. I read that too. But the fact that they couldn't even predict this trend doesn't give alot of faith in any future projections any of them can make. Like I said, skepticism is warranted as their own data changes over time. That's the only thing we can count on. And nature seems to do it's own natural changes regardless of what disastrous projections they can conjure up to sell to the public. This story is very damning to those that claim humans are killing the planet. Especially when their projections always come back to bite them in the rear. Perhaps you can learn how to interpret data correctly and leave your rampant enviro worshipping at the door. |
