You still didn't answer it. You've done that with about all of the questions asked to you.

I think that we're not being told the whole story, but that Al-Qaeda were responsible for the attacks....
I don't fully believe most high-level statements, anyone in the establishment long enough to become president/VP/SecDef/SecState has lost something along the way.

Oh c'mon, do you really expect anyone to know? And if they did, would they post it here first?

what's there to be told? Were you in Europe or in the U.S.A. when the attacks happened? How am I not being told the "true" story when I wake up, turn on the tube, and see an airplane crash into the WTC? Why is it that OBL announced he caused the attacks the VERY SAME DAY?

you mean structural damage?

Pretty much the whole (95%+) of American Citizens know what happened. I'm sure that the people who experienced the explosion and survived know what happened.

First: Nelson, just quote off of this from now on. the other quote thing is too big.:up:

Yes. I do mean that.

Yes.......they know what they've been told. As regards the theories put forward here, if cast-iron proof of some other actors responsibility was available, then GT Forum of Subsim probably wouldn't be the spot for introduction. It would be across every headline.
It is commonly accepted, with a high level of coincidental/circumstantial evidence, that Al-Qaeda was responsible. We've also been told by our governments that that is how it all happened. I believe Al-Qaeda was responsible, but I don't know the full story.

ok from i read from are government investigation teams which are government funded :lol: lol they say its fires but then they say its structural damage then they say no its both then they say well damn it we dont know lol and some of them dont even want to talk about building 7 hmm i wonder y :)

so then how does this turn into a conspiracy? If the government dosen't know for sure what brought down building 7, why does that mean that they are not telling you everything?

And even then, Please explain to me why our government would destroy our OWN, most valuable buildings economy wise, and launch a missile at our OWN military HQ only to go to war within a year? Those two contradict themselves.

but ill ask you this y did we go to war with iraq 911-iraq-oil

Hi all

Best thread in a long time. Keep it up everyone... :cool:

Cheers Porphy

I asked this earlier, but since you have been busy I'll ask again.

Are we talking about multiple US Congresses and Presidential administrations going back to 1979 or before?

i dont understand what you mean what are you asking ?

This is making me cry. Please, please don't murder the English language like this. Try spelling, punctuation and the rules of sentence construction. Just once..

If they were in it for the oil, they could simply have made friends with Saddam again. << Not my belief, but food for thought.

Thought.