![]() |
O ... k, you have convinced me. I rest my "case", if there ever was one :-?
It still does not explain the coming down of the 3 buildings, but i really think it was just so obvious that nobody thought about removing evidence when trying to remove the rubble in the heart of a city. It is interesting though you find more on the web about conspiracy theories and "evidence" about a hoax, than the real thing. Or, the first is at least easier to find .. but maybe this is not so surprising .. I saw the pictures Dowly posted, for the first time, but they can indeed be found everywhere http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=87594 - thanks ! Of course, this link http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html will probably be busted just due to its name, at least by some :03: .. but it is indeed a good collection of thoughts, for the most probable explanation why someone would make up statements contradicting the obvious or official ones. Thanks and greetings, Catfish P.S: of course, Tribesman's theory of a welsh steam train hitting has something ... but why do they need double-rimmed wheels on those tracks ? :shifty: I smell a conspiracy .. |
Quote:
Its all available on the interwebs and its all true as it has been written. |
Quote:
|
Those who believe in conspiracy theories about the two towers collapse have an explanation problem according to those who support the official line.
conspiracy believer can not explain how people could manage to place all the explosives in the twin towers. the two towers closed for a few days before 9/11. According to the rules most people know about the demolition, then these demolitions team, spend several weeks in order to place all the explosives in order to get a proper free fall. What if both supporter and opponent of these conspiracies are wrong? What if both parts are partly right? What if: It was roughly known where the planes would hit the twin towers? What if they used the law of gravity to help. What if they used the upper part of the 110 floors as a kind of pressure on the lower floors. How much explosive do you need then? How much time do a team of these demolitons people need? Remember it is just pure theory-which may not have basis in reality Markus |
Here's a good two part debate about mainly the usage of explosives.
Hardfire - Mark Roberts vs. Richard Gage (the '1500 architects' guy): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlYVUUTeZp0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45Imd5i7IGo |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It was said that the two towers was closed for some kind of maintance I can't remember when and for how long. I thought it was for 2 days. Are you saying that is not true?? I'm sorry, I must have mixed something together. I seached the internet and found this I know it's from one of these believes, but is it a lie what this person is telling us??? http://world911truth.org/world-trade...1-power-downs/ Markus |
Quote:
|
^ Thank you for the link :up:
If I should meet this Scott Forbes I would not hesitatet to ask him -Are you lying? What do you gain from that?? Markus |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Markus |
Maybe I should tell you where I got this theory from.
A few weeks ago, two mini skycrapers(13 and 15 storeys high) in Rødover, a town just outside Copenhagen, was demolished. This grating / demolition was live transmitted on TV2news http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWBn6j3uaoM Remember that I was thinking-how would those who believe in these conspiracy theories explain this? This Danish company(With help from the Scottish explosives expert William Sinclair) used several days of preparation before that blast Now imagine then how much time and resources a demolition company would need to demolish these three buildings. It was then I began to rethink- What if .... Markus |
|
Brilliant :haha:
|
Umm Dowly, did you really watch the 9/11 hardfire vids, and information ?
e.g. that one ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlYVUUTeZp0 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.