Tribesman |
05-31-10 06:51 PM |
Quote:
As for the legality of the boarding - there is no question - it was legal.
|
It would be legal if it was legal, but as it wasn't it isn't. Its outside their jurisdiction and absent of the neccesary international agreement.
But I see the problem you have....
Quote:
His refusal to divert - knowing that the UN Security Council has not deemed the blockade illegal (and thus it IS legal at the moment)
|
....you are getting the order of things backwards. Since they have not deemed it legal it remains illegal.
In fact a selection of the the words the UN use about the blockade is unacceptable, unjustifiable, counterproductive and errrr....illegal.
Quote:
"an act of war by which a belligerent prevents access to or departure from a defined part of the enemy’s coasts.
|
enemy's coast???
what is the legal status of the Palestinian territories:har:
Quote:
Doubt it? Look at history. US merchants and at least one warship were sunk prior to the US entry into WW2 -
|
Totally irrelevant, maritime law has been changed massively since 1941.:doh:
Quote:
Legally speaking, the turkish flagged ships were in violation of international maritime law by their notification of intent to bypass a legal blockade.
|
On the legal issues it appears you havn't the faintest idea what you are talking about.
|