Log in

View Full Version : Russia objects to Nato expansion


Happy Times
10-04-06, 09:12 PM
Russia objects to Nato expansion

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5407106.stm

Happy Times
10-04-06, 09:14 PM
Putin fury at Georgia 'blackmail'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5405756.stm

Yahoshua
10-04-06, 11:04 PM
Welcome back Comrade Putin.

How is the Motherland?

:shifty:

XabbaRus
10-05-06, 02:50 AM
Fair point, why does NATO need to expand? There are other ways and treating Russia like the bad boy doesn't help. You see it end up as a self fulfilling prophecy.

The Avon Lady
10-05-06, 03:24 AM
Fair point, why does NATO need to expand? There are other ways and treating Russia like the bad boy doesn't help. You see it end up as a self fulfilling prophecy.
That's right. Blame the victim.

Of course, there are at least 2 opinions here as to who is the victim here.

Here's another question: why does Russia care if NATO expands to include at least 2 states that have been badgered by Russia for years to cowtow to Russia's whims? Never mind. Question answered.

DanCanovas
10-05-06, 03:45 AM
i love reading the Avon Ladys responses. To the point and always clear. She says what she feels no matter how harsh! Are you really female!? :rotfl:

The Avon Lady
10-05-06, 03:49 AM
Are you really female!? :rotfl:
I take checkups annually. No change.

aaken
10-05-06, 03:55 AM
Here's another question: why does Russia care if NATO expands to include at least 2 states that have been badgered by Russia for years to cowtow to Russia's whims? Never mind. Question answered.
Let's see...uhmmm....maybe because those countries were under the sphere of influence of Soviet Union/Russia? Maybe because they are neighboring with Russia? Maybe because NATO could represent a threat to Russia's interests?

The Avon Lady
10-05-06, 04:05 AM
Here's another question: why does Russia care if NATO expands to include at least 2 states that have been badgered by Russia for years to cowtow to Russia's whims? Never mind. Question answered.
Let's see...uhmmm....maybe because those countries were under the sphere of influence of Soviet Union/Russia?
Well, that sure would convince me to move to the competition once the shackles have been removed. And you?
Maybe because they are neighboring with Russia?
Is there a law against countries neighboring Russia from joining NATO? In fact, could it be that there are advantages to countries neighboring Russia in joining NATO?

It would be nice to live to see a day and age where Russia itself is a NATO member but I think Putin is leading Russia in the opposite direction. But that's Russia's choice, just like joining NATO is the Ukraine's and Georgia's choice.
Maybe because NATO could represent a threat to Russia's interests?
Maybe NATO is simply fair competition to what Russia has to offer these countries or ram down their throats, as is the case currently in Georgia.

aaken
10-05-06, 04:14 AM
Is there a law against countries neighboring Russia from joining NATO? In fact, could it be that there are advantages to countries neighboring Russia in joining NATO?

It would be nice to live to see a day and age where Russia itself is a NATO member but I think Putin is leading Russia in the opposite direction. But that's Russia's choice, just like joining NATO is the Ukraine's and Georgia's choice.

Of course there isn't any law but I can understand why Russia does not want them to join. Russia is not a member of NATO and I think the interests of Russia and NATO (or USA) are somewhat diverging.

Maybe NATO is simply fair competition to what Russia has to offer these countries or ram down their throats, as is the case currently in Georgia.
I'm not debating this point. Just arguing that, in Russia's place, I'd do the same. They are just acting according to their interests. As anybody else does.

DanCanovas
10-05-06, 04:28 AM
thats true, if canada joined what was the Warsaw pact, then I think the US might have had a few words to say, although the mood and politics of the time were different during those days

XabbaRus
10-05-06, 04:31 AM
You see ever since the collapse of the USSR the primary reason to be for NATO has ceased to exist, yet Russia is still made out to be the bad boy, after a while it responds by acting to type, happens with people happens with countries.

I wonder what would happen if Russia started building a military alliance with countries on America's border, eg Mexico et al? Would the US not bitch and moan.

Why does Russia care? Why does NATO need to expand? Just like I'll admit Russia is paranoid about NATO so the western countries are of Russia. I can't see Russia making a move against NATO or former republics same as NATO won't move against Russia. The thing is the paranoia remains on both sides.

The Avon Lady
10-05-06, 04:57 AM
You see ever since the collapse of the USSR the primary reason to be for NATO has ceased to exist,
I agree but there are secondary reasons that still justify its existance and many of them have nothing to do with Russia anyway. To quote Wikipedia:
The core of NATO is Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. Consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
The clincher is this:
the provision was invoked for the first time in the treaty's history on 12 September 2001, in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States the day before.
Not against Russia but another enemy.
yet Russia is still made out to be the bad boy
Rather than being "made out", maybe it simply is. If the shoe fits.
after a while it responds by acting to type, happens with people happens with countries.
Once again, who is responding to whom?
I wonder what would happen if Russia started building a military alliance with countries on America's border, eg Mexico et al? Would the US not bitch and moan.
Sure it would.
Why does Russia care? Why does NATO need to expand? Just like I'll admit Russia is paranoid about NATO so the western countries are of Russia.
I don't think it has anything to do with Paranoia. Maybe you have to be paranoid to assume so. :hmm:

Russia has clearly taken directions that are both counter to western democratic ones and hint strongly at a reversal of direction in Russia's openness. Russia's entitled to do what they want but don't expect the rest of the world not to respond.
I can't see Russia making a move against NATO or former republics same as NATO won't move against Russia.
Personally, neither can I. As I mentioned, NATO has concerns other than Russia.
The thing is the paranoia remains on both sides.
I disagree.

Skybird
10-05-06, 05:52 AM
The more NATO moves into the southern east, the higher the likelihood that it will find itself being wrapped up in local wars and Islamic confrontations I do not see it prepared for, nor is western public. That Russia legitimately will be angry at such moves will not make the sitations any easier. Plus: these countries in that region - are far, far away from the northern Atlantic. How free to act NATO alrerady is we have seen during the Balkan wars. NATO is effectively a helping division nof wars that are fought by the US. Additonally, the US has no interest in an independent, capable european military or expedition force. The attempts of Europeans to create this, like the Euro brigade, may have been small enoiugh, nevertheless immediately triggered most robust pressure to put them under NATO command again . and NATO is dominated by the US without whom nothing goes - in good and in bad.

I am strictly against any further steps of NATO into the East. Else it sooner or later ends up guarding borders in the Kamchatka area. :doh: Some people want to take a bite that is bigger than what they can chew.

The Avon Lady
10-05-06, 06:53 AM
NATO in the news:

NATO takes over eastern Afghanistan (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061005/ap_on_re_as/afghan_nato;_ylt=Aov6DNUm5abVnWIhNk_8d2as0NUE;_ylu =X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--)

Behind the NATO facade, the Taliban leave their mark (http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/afghanistannatoustaliban;_ylt=AkA5xLqyrTtqabt61m18 1hb9xg8F;_ylu=X3oDMTA3NmxuamZjBHNlYwNyaGw-)

Oberon
10-05-06, 09:15 AM
Encroaching on Russia is a bad idea, Russia may be a shadow of what it was during the USSR days, but that does not mean you should back it into a corner. Giving assistance and increasing trade with the former WP states is a good idea, bringing them all the way into NATO, not a brilliant idea...yet.

TteFAboB
10-05-06, 09:41 AM
Who said I want Georgia in NATO? Sure, Ukraine can come, but Georgia?

For all I care Russia and Georgia deserve each other equally.

Of course, since I'm not a General or anything, it doesn't matter what I want or not. :D

Konovalov
10-05-06, 09:51 AM
Who said I want Georgia in NATO? Sure, Ukraine can come, but Georgia?

For all I care Russia and Georgia deserve each other equally.

Of course, since I'm not a General or anything, it doesn't matter what I want or not. :D

Throw Georgia in a pool full of Stingrays hey TteFAboB? ;) :lol:

Immacolata
10-05-06, 09:55 AM
I think Russia fears its options diminish, that is why it does not like NATO encroaching on its neighbours. With NATO there is no more coercion like what we see being done to Georgia. In this situation Georgia is in a kind of Neville vs Hitler situation. No matter what Georgia does or doesn't do it will be irrelevant as Russia prepares to take the steps it believes are necessary.

TteFAboB
10-05-06, 01:11 PM
Who said I want Georgia in NATO? Sure, Ukraine can come, but Georgia?

For all I care Russia and Georgia deserve each other equally.

Of course, since I'm not a General or anything, it doesn't matter what I want or not. :D

Throw Georgia in a pool full of Stingrays hey TteFAboB? ;) :lol:

:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Yahoshua
10-05-06, 06:11 PM
Can anyone please tell me what government Russia is now operated by since Putin now has absolute control of both the military and the public media?

Oberon
10-06-06, 05:56 AM
The government of Deja Vu? :doh:

fredbass
10-06-06, 06:22 AM
The government of Deja Vu? :doh:

:p :|\\

Russia has been swimming in rough waters for some time now. I hope that what seems like a desperate situation doesnt result in unfortunate desperate actions.

Oberon
10-06-06, 06:33 AM
Indeed....Russia needs a strong leader like Putin to pull itself back together...what it doesn't need is a return to the old Soviet days where more money was spent on military expansion than public resources, and Pravda was gospel. It's a helluva mess and I don't envy Putin one bit, but he's got to play this carefully...

Fish
10-06-06, 06:44 AM
You see ever since the collapse of the USSR the primary reason to be for NATO has ceased to exist, yet Russia is still made out to be the bad boy, after a while it responds by acting to type, happens with people happens with countries.

I wonder what would happen if Russia started building a military alliance with countries on America's border, eg Mexico et al? Would the US not bitch and moan.

Why does Russia care? Why does NATO need to expand? Just like I'll admit Russia is paranoid about NATO so the western countries are of Russia. I can't see Russia making a move against NATO or former republics same as NATO won't move against Russia. The thing is the paranoia remains on both sides.

Cuba.:cool:

Happy Times
10-08-06, 12:40 AM
The government of Deja Vu? :doh:
:p :|\\

Russia has been swimming in rough waters for some time now. I hope that what seems like a desperate situation doesnt result in unfortunate desperate actions.

" Hunt for Russia reporter's killer

Russian prosecutors investigating the murder of a prominent journalist say they believe her death could be linked to her investigative reporting.

Anna Politkovskaya was found shot dead on Saturday in a lift at her apartment block in the Russian capital, Moscow.

[...]"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4801601.stm

Yahoshua
10-08-06, 10:06 AM
Rossiya television quoted police who said Ms Politkovskaya had been shot three times in the body and once in the head.

A pistol and four bullet cartridges were found near her body.

It's obvious it's a hit.

And a sloppy job of it at that.