Log in

View Full Version : 50,000 GB DVD using proteins - Nice!


SUBMAN1
07-12-06, 09:33 AM
http://in.tech.yahoo.com/060708/139/65pz8.html


Indian-born scientist developing coated DVD's that can make hard disks obsolete



Sydney, Jul 8 (ANI): An Indian born scientist in the US is working on developing DVD's which can be coated with a light -sensitive protein and can store up to 50 terabytes (about 50,000 gigabytes) of data.


Professor V Renugopalakrishnan of the Harvard Medical School in Boston has claimed to have developed a layer of protein made from tiny genetically altered microbe proteins which could store enough data to make computer hard disks almost obsolete.


"What this will do eventually is eliminate the need for hard drive memory completely," ABC quoted Prof. Renugopalakrishnan, a BSc in Chemistry from Madras University and PhD in biophysics from Columbia/State University of New York, Buffalo, New York as saying.


The light-activated protein is found in the membrane of a salt marsh microbe Halobacterium salinarum and is also known as bacteriorhodopsin (bR). It captures and stores sunlight to convert it to chemical energy. When light shines on bR, it is converted to a series of intermediate molecules each with a unique shape and colour before returning to its 'ground state'.


Since the intermediates generally only last for hours or days, Prof Renugopalakrishnan and his colleagues modified the DNA that produces bR protein to produce an intermediate that lasts for more than several years. They also engineered the bR protein to make its intermediates more stable at the high temperatures generated by storing terabytes of data.


This, they said, ultimately paved the way for a binary system to store data.
"The ground state could be the zero and any of the intermediates could be the one," he said.


Prof Renugopalakrishnan now opines that the protein layer could also allow DVDs and other external devices to store terabytes of information.
The new protein-based DVD will have advantages over current optical storage devices such as the Blue-ray as well, because the information is stored in proteins that are only a few nanometres across.


"The protein-based DVDs will be able to store at least 20 times more than the Blue-ray and eventually even up to 50,000 gigabytes (about 50 terabytes) of information. You can pack literally thousands and thousands of those proteins on a media like a DVD, a CD or a film or whatever," he said.


The high-capacity storage devices will be essential to the defence, medical and entertainment industries.


"You have a compelling need that is not going to be met with the existing magnetic storage technology," he added.


However, there's a flip side to it also.
"Science can be used and abused. Making large amounts of information so portable on high-capacity removable storage devices will make it easier for information to fall into the wrong hands. Information can be stolen very quickly. One has to have some safeguards there," he added.


The findings were presented at the International Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Brisbane this week. (ANI)

kiwi_2005
07-12-06, 10:15 AM
:o :o

Just one of these disk is all i will probably need for a lifetime. :D

STEED
07-12-06, 10:24 AM
Blast it, I updated my video tapes to DVD and now this!!! :damn:

I give up. :rolleyes:

SUBMAN1
07-12-06, 10:33 AM
:o :o

Just one of these disk is all i will probably need for a lifetime. :D
Nah! I'd use it. I'd store all my music in RAW format since space is no longer an issue! Right now I use a modified OGG engine (GT3B2) that is near lossless which works for now (MP3 sucks - can't stand the artifacts it places in music). Actually - I'd probably use exclusesevely FLAC as an engine then because it 'is' lossless - not a single bit of audio data is lost in the compression.

I'd also start storing movies in RAW format since compression wouldn't be an issue. 80 GB an hour is about what an uncompressed movie works out to last time I did it. I actually ended up using huffyuv lossless compressor becasue it was just getting too big. This cut it down by about half.

-S

TteFAboB
07-12-06, 02:09 PM
First, I thought there was no point in starting the article stressing the Professor is Indian-born, why does it matter at all? Then I got to the part where they say his name. Somebody might confuse it for a German word.

SUBMAN1
07-12-06, 03:01 PM
First, I thought there was no point in starting the article stressing the Professor is Indian-born, why does it matter at all? Then I got to the part where they say his name. Somebody might confuse it for a German word.

I thought the same thing - so what? He is American now. Must be a pro Indian writer for some reason.

I think we would have some funny headlines if we started writting "English decendant makes new super computer" or something like that on everything we write! Too funny!

-S

Onkel Neal
07-13-06, 12:21 AM
:o :o

Just one of these disk is all i will probably need for a lifetime. :D

Lol, I said the same thing in 1995 about a 800 MB hard drive :)

Deamon
07-13-06, 06:31 AM
:o :o

Just one of these disk is all i will probably need for a lifetime. :D
Nah! I'd use it. I'd store all my music in RAW format since space is no longer an issue! Right now I use a modified OGG engine (GT3B2) that is near lossless which works for now (MP3 sucks - can't stand the artifacts it places in music). Actually - I'd probably use exclusesevely FLAC as an engine then because it 'is' lossless - not a single bit of audio data is lost in the compression.

I'd also start storing movies in RAW format since compression wouldn't be an issue. 80 GB an hour is about what an uncompressed movie works out to last time I did it. I actually ended up using huffyuv lossless compressor becasue it was just getting too big. This cut it down by about half.

-S

Whitch tools are you using for it ?

SUBMAN1
07-13-06, 02:10 PM
:o :o

Just one of these disk is all i will probably need for a lifetime. :D
Nah! I'd use it. I'd store all my music in RAW format since space is no longer an issue! Right now I use a modified OGG engine (GT3B2) that is near lossless which works for now (MP3 sucks - can't stand the artifacts it places in music). Actually - I'd probably use exclusesevely FLAC as an engine then because it 'is' lossless - not a single bit of audio data is lost in the compression.

I'd also start storing movies in RAW format since compression wouldn't be an issue. 80 GB an hour is about what an uncompressed movie works out to last time I did it. I actually ended up using huffyuv lossless compressor becasue it was just getting too big. This cut it down by about half.

-S
Whitch tools are you using for it ?
For OGG? GT3B2 - This mod removes the limitations on bitrate, so even though you would average 212 kbps on a song (using q6 under GT3B2 - which also makes OGG use independant stereo chan), you can peak at 600 or 700 kbps for a ms or two to keep the quality of the song if the song needs it. As you might as guessed - ugly sounding artifacts do not exist under this mod as found in MP3.

I did a test vs CD on this and you can't hear the diff. Only thing I could detect easily is the db loss caused by the sound card. As for sound qual - its perfect - or as near as you can get for a compression. Next step up is FLAC from here.

One more thing - if you are looking for a target bitrate under 212 kbps (Ususally averages 190 kbps even at q6 with GT3B2), say like 160 or below - GT3B2 is a little out of date for that area of smaller file sizes and you might be better off using something else. If you don't mind better sounding q levels (q5 or q6 for example) which make slightly larger files, than it is a good choice.

-S

PS. Are you talking the vid front? I used Virtual dub to do most of my dirty work, with hand edited filters to remove interlacing, etc. The list of things I use here are a mile long, so I don't know what detail you are looking for here.

Sailor Steve
07-13-06, 02:58 PM
:o :o

Just one of these disk is all i will probably need for a lifetime. :D

Lol, I said the same thing in 1995 about a 800 MB hard drive :)
I said it in 1998 about my 10 GB hard drive. But then I was mighty impressed the first time I saw a hard drive for the Atari 520...20 MB.

On the other hand, I've had a 160 Gig HD for more than a year, and it's barely 1/4 full.