Log in

View Full Version : X1 Software pic thingy....


Karl-Heinz Jaeger
03-28-06, 07:43 AM
Anyone know what happened to the X1 Software pic that was in mine and a lot of others signature? Anyone know another link to it?

Cdre Gibs
03-28-06, 09:09 AM
You mean this 1 ?

http://www.git.com.au/~voyager_tek/boycottx17zg.jpg

If so use this line in your sig :


[-img]http://www.git.com.au/~voyager_tek/boycottx17zg.jpg[/img-]

Just remove the - out of the [-img]/[/img-] bit's to this / and your set.

Karl-Heinz Jaeger
03-28-06, 10:47 AM
Thanks Herr Gibs! :up:


Knew it would be around somewhere! :rock:

Reece
03-29-06, 07:51 AM
Better change that now to GMX Media & distributed by G2 Games, as I found out the hard way on a previous post!!! :damn:

Karl-Heinz Jaeger
03-29-06, 11:05 AM
Can you elaborate Reece? Did you get told off for displaying the signature tag??

Reece
03-30-06, 09:45 PM
No, I was sent to the shame corner!! :-j
I saw the add at 'GMX Media' & no mention anywhere about X1 software, I'd forgotten about the name 'Seawolves' & thought it was a new game, :oops: That was the way it was advertised, not even a mention that you needed SH3 to run it!! :x

SubSerpent
03-30-06, 09:55 PM
This topic should be discontinued. It will eventually turn into a community vs Wulfmann war once again.

Please remove the 'X' and '1' keys from your keyboards. It's as easy as that.

Wulfmann
03-31-06, 10:16 AM
This topic should be discontinued. It will eventually turn into a community vs Wulfmann war once again.

Please remove the 'X' and '1' keys from your keyboards. It's as easy as that.

Maybe I should change my nick to Leonidas? :hmm: :rotfl: :hmm:

I am trying to ignore this subject as it relates to the first add on as I agree the bad feelings have merit (does that sound like a politician?)

Only when those accusations are directed at the new Med version will I step in and, (as someone who has it) comment on reality.
I will not respond to the notion that because of feelings to the first the second does not merit your consideration. That is understandable
Only when false statements on originality are ascribed to the second will I object and correct.

Wulfmann