View Full Version : Metox
Does the Metox radar detector turn into a homing beacon for Allied aircraft in SH3?
I cant belive it took them so long to find this out in the real war. Someone must have gotten a stern talking to.
According to the author of Iron Coffins that would mean it is modelled correctly.
Threadfin
03-02-06, 04:20 PM
The Germans thought this was the case. It wasn't. The Allies could not home on the "Biscay Cross". But the Germans were led to believe they could, and therefore deprived themselves of a valuable tool.
VonHelsching
03-02-06, 06:22 PM
Does the Metox radar detector turn into a homing beacon for Allied aircraft in SH3?
I.
Definitly no.
A radar detector is a receiver. It does not emit anything that can be traced.
Heibges
03-02-06, 08:16 PM
I think the British had a plot to make them think this was the case.
Dantenoc
03-02-06, 08:36 PM
I think the British had a plot to make them think this was the case.
Yes, the famous case where a captured RAF pilot "confesed" that the allies could trace the radar detector's signal for hundreds of miles... it was a load of bull-poo but the germans beleived him... the myth persists to this day for some folks too :know:
mike_espo
03-02-06, 08:54 PM
Does the RWR Metox, Biscay cross work?? I was in a type IXC in 1944 scenario and it did not even make a noise, or nothing...my watch called it out.....
What effect does it have in the game?
Kilamon
03-03-06, 01:19 PM
I think the British had a plot to make them think this was the case.
Yes, the famous case where a captured RAF pilot "confesed" that the allies could trace the radar detector's signal for hundreds of miles... it was a load of bull-poo but the germans beleived him... the myth persists to this day for some folks too :know:
Here's a fascinating read... http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/BlaUboat.pdf
Does the Metox radar detector turn into a homing beacon for Allied aircraft in SH3?
I.
Definitly no.
A radar detector is a receiver. It does not emit anything that can be traced.
unfortunateley not, in my country (the netherlands) its forbidden to have a radar detector in your car, and the police uses a radar detector detector to catch the ones that do :doh:
cheers
NoLine
MarshalLaw
03-03-06, 09:08 PM
Radar detectors are a passive device. They do not emit a signal , only detects a radar signal that hits them. The radar detector in the game works well. It has saved my bacon on several encounters with ships and planes. HOWEVER the radar that you can get is nothing more than a homing beacon. Plus it is almost useless. If I'm not mistaken it only had a 40 degree arc on each side. In order to do a full 360 degree sweep, the u-boat had to go in a circle. what a waste. :doh:
mike_espo
03-04-06, 06:23 PM
A radar detector is passive: it does not emit any radiation whatsoever.
:yep:
It has been established that after "Black May", that the BdU perpetuated that Metox emissions were responsible for the losses. They could not accept the fact that the allies were able to operate Radar at 9cm.
Once a British bomber was shot down over Holland, and the H2S radar examined, that they realized that was the reason for the losses.
The Germans thought it impossible, they could not build a radar capable of 9cm wavelegnths,so they blamed the Metox.
Info from: The U-Boat War by David Westwood. pp 206 :know:
AntEater
03-04-06, 07:51 PM
Certainly no "clever british plot".
There were certain "things which could not be" in german military research regarding U-Boats:
- Enigma is unbreakable
- Centimetric radar is impossible
To understand why it is important to know that military science was one of the weak points in Germany. While Germany did produce some amazing new weapons, a military research did not happen in the organized fashion as in the US or Britain.
German technological breakthroughs were either result of company work (jet engine) or charming individuals (Walther Submarine, Rocket Program) who were able to sell their work to high ranking officials.
Each branch had their own engineering departmen, which was staffed with people from the military or the military administration, but not real scientists.
Also it was strongly personalized:
Radar, like Codebreaking, had just one person in charge who simply sought to cover its back. It was like that with Admiral Maertens who always assured Doenitz that Enigma is unbreakable, it was like that with General Martini who was in charge of Radar development.
Of course that one brit told them this story, it was believed because it was an explanation that did not involve the "impossible" centimetric radar.
The best german scientists (or better, the best german scientists without von Brauns or Walthers marketing talent) spent the war at the universities, not working for the war effort. Konrad Zuse designed his first programmable computer in his living room and nobody official EVER gave a damn about him. In Britain he would have been "invited" to Bletchley Park in no time.
In any chase, it did not really do any harm as Metox was useless against centimetric radar, so it did not provide any warning at all.
So wether you left off Metox because of fear of detection or because of knowing it was useless did not really matter.
Of course it might still detect older metric ASV sets, but these were replaced pretty fast. Long ranging Uboats in the indian Ocean or the Brazilian coast might have put metox to some use, as the aircraft there did not get top of the line radar as soon as those in Britain or Iceland.
tycho102
03-04-06, 07:58 PM
Radar detectors are a passive device.
No. Their functionality is passive, but their operation is far from passive.
Called "signal leak" or "signal egress", anything with an oscillator circuit will emit RF. Your toaster, your wristwatch, your LCD/CRT monitor, printer, keyboard, mouse. The amount of power it transmits is a function of design, and some designs have more leakage than others.
For example, your computer's BIOS may have a "spread spectrum" function. People sometimes refer to it as electromagnetic-interference, but it's just normal signal egress from your sound card and hard drive that cause problems. Signal egress is why ethernet uses "twisted pair" cabling.
At the time, using radio-tubes, the receiver sensitivity was not altered like it is today. The output power was increased or decreased, and the receiver was always operated at maximum sensitivity. This is why so many receivers were going out all the time, but point being that they emitted RF at their maximum design power...all the time. Radiotubes cannot be made sensitive enough to pickup the signal egress, but transistors can.
It's was theoretically possible to pickup the Metox detector, but the British would have needed a transistorized receiver (with SMD's of 1mm size and smaller) to do it. Which is exactly why the Germans were so stunned by that pilot's interrogation.
jasondef
03-05-06, 11:05 PM
So what you're saying is that there's no chance of getting a hold of a radar detector-detector-detector for your car in addition to a radar detector to thwart those pesky police speed traps with radar guns and radar detector detectors! :P
xrvjorn
03-06-06, 10:11 AM
So what you're saying is that there's no chance of getting a hold of a radar detector-detector-detector for your car in addition to a radar detector to thwart those pesky police speed traps with radar guns and radar detector detectors! :P
If radar detectors are illegal, maybe radar detector-detector-detector aren't? In order to detect them, the police would need to get radar detector-detector-detector-detectors, and the counter measure for that would be ...
hey xrvjorn, could you post a pic of your rig? that sounds like a supercomputer...
HEMISENT
03-06-06, 05:29 PM
Don't know about radar detector-detector-detectors to combat speed radars but I do know that radar jammers are now coming down in price- should be ordering one this spring. Supposedly the good ones work pretty well against everything except lasar speed detection.
xrvjorn
03-07-06, 08:34 AM
hey xrvjorn, could you post a pic of your rig? that sounds like a supercomputer...
http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/computers/gallery/cdc/3600.jpg
It uses quite a bit of electicity, so I have a small nuclear reactor to keep it running. It makes me lose all my hair, but I glow nicely in the dark and have a handsome green tan.
Kaptan Tommy
03-07-06, 10:00 AM
So what you're saying is that there's no chance of getting a hold of a radar detector-detector-detector for your car in addition to a radar detector to thwart those pesky police speed traps with radar guns and radar detector detectors! :P
If radar detectors are illegal, maybe radar detector-detector-detector aren't? In order to detect them, the police would need to get radar detector-detector-detector-detectors, and the counter measure for that would be ...
:rotfl:
Big Vern
04-22-24, 02:42 PM
Metox did leek the signal from its Local Oscillator out of the Biscay Cross aerial and it was detectable from a homing receiver on an aircraft at ranges up to 50Km. The Germans knew the Local Oscillator frequency of the equipment, built a homing Receiver and trialled it in July 1943. The Story about the RAF pilot saying the British were homing on Metox is also true, he was interrogated in Early August 1943 and the U-Boat command were informed on the same day.
Hooston
04-24-24, 04:11 AM
i used to work as an aircraft electromagnetic compatibility engineer about 15 years ago. Post war military comms gear has some antenna terminal tests to pass to make sure they do not leak any compromising (or more usually irritating) signals. TV sets in the UK used to deliberately leak the local oscillator so that "detector vans" could find people watching TV without a licence, although I believe more usually it was done by peeking through the curtains!
As you might expect from a quick lash up, Metox leaked its local oscillator signal. As some posters have said the Germans got in a panic about it thanks to some genius PoW shooting a line, but the Allies never made use of the signals. Thanks to wolfpack tactics and Doenitz's control freak command style Uboats made regular reports over HF which gave away their position even when the signal could not be decripted.
According to Prof R V Jones' book the Germans also fell for the "Crosse and Blackwell" super bomber thanks to another PoW.
Aktungbby
04-24-24, 10:07 AM
Big Vern! Great Necro!:arrgh!::Kaleun_Salute:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c6/RadarDetector_1.png/330px-RadarDetector_1.png< at least providing a ready-made cross you could pray to when being depth charged!??:oops::dead: The Metox was manufactured by a small French company in occupied Paris. It was tuned to receive the 1.5-metre (200 MHz) signals used by many British radars of the early and mid-World War II era, notably the ASV Mk. II radar used by RAF Coastal Command to attack U-boats. It is not clear whether the design was German or French or both. It was installed on German U-boats starting in 1942 and used until the end of the war.[1] The system given the official title of FuMB 1 (for Funkmessbeobachtungsgerät, Radio measuring device). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASV_Mark_II_radar They didn't call it the Wizard War for nothing! Required reading for true :subsim:ers> https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71e3CkrFeML._SY466_.jpg:arrgh!:
Kal_Maximus_U669
04-29-24, 04:22 PM
Big Vern! Great Necro!:arrgh!::Kaleun_Salute:< at least providing a ready-made cross you could pray to when being depth charged!
Here is the manual that goes with it.... to save your skin....... :har::har::haha::timeout:
https://pngimg.com/d/bible_PNG48.png
Hooston
05-27-24, 04:50 AM
I've been thinking again about an allied PoW spreading the story that the allies were homing on spurious Metox emissions. Doesn't it come from RV Jones' book? I can't remember. I always got the impression that the Prof liked his stories.
It doesn't seem a very likely tale for a serviceman to come up with. Is it not possible that this particular crewman was indeed using his ASV mk II radar to detect Metox emissions? Metox might show up as a uniform shifting of the line on his "A scope" display, depending on the exact setup of the ASV receiver and display circuitry. If he was doing so it would make him more likely to find a uboat and thus also more likely to get shot down and captured!
I don't suppose we will ever know as everyone involved is pushing up the daisies. I suppose it makes no difference to the outcome - a lot of spurious activity from the Germans and even deactivation of the receiver at one point.
Shadowblade
05-27-24, 08:10 AM
I've been thinking again about an allied PoW spreading the story that the allies were homing on spurious Metox emissions. Doesn't it come from RV Jones' book? I can't remember. I always got the impression that the Prof liked his stories.
source should be:
Ratcliff, R. A. (14 August 2006). Delusions of Intelligence: Enigma, Ultra, and the End of Secure Ciphers. Cambridge University Press. p. 146. ISBN 0521855225
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.