Who / What / Where Game Part 2

[Ostfriese]

Japanese?

[Jimbuna]

Indeed.

[mapuc]

Japanese Type 14 Nambu pistol ?

Markus

[Jimbuna]

Japanese Type 14 Nambu pistol ?

Markus

That's the one :up:

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Nambu_pistol#Type_14

https://i.postimg.cc/V6tpR9vg/Nambupistol2465.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

Over to you Markus :salute:

[mapuc]

What is this (should be an easy one)

https://i.imgur.com/8cL1avrm.jpg

Should also give a thanks to Ostfriese for leading me to the promise land.

Markus

[Aktungbby]

Watergate hotel?

[mapuc]

^ No

Markus

[Ostfriese]

Cruise Ship?

[mapuc]

Yes

Markus

[Jimbuna]

Queen Mary 2?

[mapuc]

Queen Mary 2?

It is Queen Mary 2
(Said it would be an easy one)

https://i.imgur.com/9l9VlFym.jpg

Over to you Jim :salute:

(It's my favorite cruise ship, would love to take world cruise on her)

Markus

[Jimbuna]

What is this beauty?

https://i.postimg.cc/PJFH8Z4T/blob.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

[Ostfriese]

Binoculars?

[Jimbuna]

Afraid not.

[mapuc]

What I see is a twin afterburner on a fighter jet.

It looks like the afterburner on F/A-18E

Markus

[Jimbuna]

What you see is wrong :)

[Aktungbby]

British aircraft?

[Jimbuna]

It is an aircraft but not British.

[Eichhörnchen]

Civil aircraft?

[Jimbuna]

Not civilian no.

[Eichhörnchen]

Russian?

[Jimbuna]

Yes.

[Catfish]

TU 160 'Blackjack' ?

[Ostfriese]

An ekranoplan?

[Catfish]

^ this would not exactly be an aircraft(?) :hmmm:

[Eichhörnchen]

Tu-22?

[Jimbuna]

TU 160 'Blackjack' ?

An ekranoplan?

Neither but Ostfriese isn't too far off.

[Jimbuna]

Tu-22?

Close.

CLUE: There aren't a great many left.

[Aktungbby]

Bartini-Beriev VVA-14?

[Jimbuna]

Bartini-Beriev VVA-14?

That's the one :up:

https://i.postimg.cc/xCYwYF1N/Bartini-Beriev-VVA-14.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartini_Beriev_VVA-14

Over to you :salute:

[Aktungbby]

What is this?https://subsim.com/radioroom/picture.php?albumid=815&pictureid=13187

[Eichhörnchen]

It looks like some civil derivative of the B-52, so my first question has to be: is it civilian?

[Jimbuna]

Russian?

[Aktungbby]

It looks like some civil derivative of the B-52, so my first question has to be: is it civilian?it could have gone both ways...

Russian?nope

[Jimbuna]

American?

[Aktungbby]

nope

[Jimbuna]

EU country?

[Eichhörnchen]

How many built?

[Jimbuna]

I asked that three posts up Glynn so you might want to edit yours.

[Eichhörnchen]

I asked that three posts up Glynn so you might want to edit yours.

Done, cheers :up:

[mapuc]

My question is:

Is it British ?

It also made me recall this puppet series Thunderbirds

Markus

[Aktungbby]

EU country?NO!

How many built?
3
My question is:

Is it British ?

It also made me recall this puppet series Thunderbirds

MarkusNope

[Eichhörnchen]

Is the one pictured in a museum?

[Aktungbby]

since U asked, I checked: not the whole thing...and what is, is viewable by appointment only. :yep::woot::know:

[Jimbuna]

Australian?

[Aktungbby]

nope

[Catfish]

So.. asian?

[Jimbuna]

Canadian?

[Aktungbby]

So.. asian? no.:shucks:

Canadian? nope

[Catfish]

So is it south-american or african?

[Eichhörnchen]

An English-speaking country?

[Aktungbby]

So is it south-american or african?

An English-speaking country?Nein to bothayaz! nor was it an EU country as Jumbuna asked(post 4187); but that's not to say it wasn't in Europe:yep: (practically a dead giveaway)

[Eichhörnchen]

Ukraine?

[Jimbuna]

Antonov An-225?

[Catfish]

From the projected Antonov An-50 only test models were built, but not one prototype :hmmm:

[Aktungbby]

Ukraine?

Antonov An-225?

From the projected Antonov An-50 only test models were built, but not one prototype :hmmm:nope to all three of yaz, but it was a communist country...at the time:hmmm:

[Jimbuna]

Former eastern bloc?

[Eichhörnchen]

So the aircraft was the product of this country's indigenous aero industry?

[Aktungbby]

Former eastern bloc?

So the aircraft was the product of this country's indigenous aero industry?Yup to bothayaz! You're on the scent. I can't believe it's not solved yet. 'Twas meant to be an easy one for the aeronautically inklyn'd!:o Hint: One prototype crashed(with fatalities) and the project was discontinued due to fuel-line issues....

[Catfish]

Hungarian or romanian? :hmmm:

[Aktungbby]

nope to both

[Catfish]

Bulgarian?

[Aktungbby]

nope...further north

[Ostfriese]

Baade 152 (East German Jet Airliner)?

[Aktungbby]

EXACTLY! I knew you'd get it! Over 2 U :Kaleun_Salute:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-54953-0004%2C_Flugzeugwerk_Dresden%2C_Flugzeug_152.jpg The Baade 152 also known as Dresden 152, VL-DDR 152 or simply 152, was a post-war airliner designed and manufactured by East German aircraft company VEB Flugzeugwerke Dresden. The aircraft was named after German aeronautical engineer Brunolf Baade, the principal designer involved in the programme. It had the distinction of being the first jet airliner to be developed in Germany.

The Baade 152 represents the final development in the Junkers aircraft family which ended with the "development planes" (Entwicklungsflugzeug – EF). Its development drew upon the OKB-1 150, an aborted bomber that was developed in the Soviet Union with assistance from captured German scientists. The Baade 152's basic configuration shares many similarities, including shape, size, wing-area, landing gear configuration, empty weight, range, altitude, speed, power per engine, and double-engine cowling arrangement with the American-built Boeing B-47 Stratojet, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baade_152 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Deutsche-lufthansa-152.jpg/1280px-Deutsche-lufthansa-152.jpg

[Ostfriese]

Yay =)


Right to it: what's this?


https://i.imgur.com/kOtnnBg.jpeg

[Aktungbby]

1950's car?

[Ostfriese]

Yes.

[Aktungbby]

British?

[Ostfriese]

No, not British

[Eichhörnchen]

American?

[Ostfriese]

Yes.

[Jimbuna]

Cadillac?

[Eichhörnchen]

Oldsmobile Golden Rocket

[Ostfriese]

Oldsmobile Golden Rocket


Excellent :)


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Oldsmobile_Golden_Rocket.jpg


Over to Squirrel McSquirrelface :D

[Eichhörnchen]

^ 50s car>rocket styling>front :haha:

https://i.imgur.com/DVUnxeX.jpg What are these?

[Jimbuna]

Canvas wedges?

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/ZI05Ai8.jpg

Indeed - nothing concealed, so I knew that if one of you had seen them before then it would be over quick :haha:

To Jim

[Jimbuna]

It'll be tomorrow morning for me I'm afraid but "I WILL BE BACK"

[Jimbuna]

What is this?

https://i.postimg.cc/NMFZdcWx/blob2.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

[Ostfriese]

A hatch of a passenger aircraft?

[Jimbuna]

Afraid not.

[Eichhörnchen]

An engine housing?

[Jimbuna]

Nope.

[mapuc]

Space related ?

Markus

[Jimbuna]

Not space no.

[Ostfriese]

A submersible?

[Jimbuna]

It is.

[Aktungbby]

civilian?

[Jimbuna]

Yes.

[Aktungbby]

british?

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/n25I7Kz.jpg UW "Cyclops"

[Catfish]

University of Washington's Cyclops?

edit lol

[Eichhörnchen]

:D:D:D

[Jimbuna]

UCW it is :up:

Over to Glynn :salute:

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/xRabUiO.jpg What and where?

[Aktungbby]

British?

[mapuc]

It looks like these bridge foundation.

Markus

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Not British and not part of a bridge (although it does look very like it in the picture, Markus)

[Aktungbby]

in europe?

[Jimbuna]

Fort de la Conchée?

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/VjCQkyg.jpg

@ Aktung - no, not in Europe

@ Jim - no

[Jimbuna]

A Tomb?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Nope

[Jimbuna]

Stationary object?

[Catfish]

Cannot see any of the pictures posted lately, regardless which browser or setting I use :hmmm:

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Jim - yes

[Aktungbby]

Ancient?

[Eichhörnchen]

No, not at all ancient

[mapuc]

Some kind of Quay/Wharf ?

Markus

[Aktungbby]

in Manila bay?

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Markus - no

@ Aktung - you thinking of Fort Drum? No, it's not in the Philippines

[Jimbuna]

A building/structure?

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Jim - yes, but more than just buildings and structure

[Aktungbby]

in America?

[Jimbuna]

Statue of Liberty?

[Aktungbby]

that's my next guess too!:yeah:...proof: grate mines think alike!:timeout:

[Eichhörnchen]

Well you're both wrong :haha:

[Jimbuna]

Chinese?

[Catfish]

I guess i can guess even if i don't see the picture :D

Military installation?

[Jimbuna]

I guess i can guess even if i don't see the picture :D

Military installation?

Can you see this Kai?

https://i.postimg.cc/PrWHVXBT/blob.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Jim - no

@ Kai - no

https://i.imgur.com/T6VnkyC.jpg Clue: there's an 007 movie connection

[Catfish]

^ Thanks Jim, now i can :up:

Hashima Island?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Just like that!!! :har:

https://i.imgur.com/T02EJQs.jpg Off Nagasaki


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashima_Island

[Catfish]

Again thanks @Jim :up:

The Bond hint gave me the idea :)


ok, what is this ..

https://i.imgur.com/Pypi3dum.jpg

[Eichhörnchen]

Looks Russian?

[Ostfriese]

Polish PZL.37 bomber?

[Aktungbby]

that's my next guess too!:yeah:...proof: grate mines think alike!:timeout:

there's an 007 movie connection

Again thanks @Jim :up:

The Bond hint gave me the idea :)


...and here's me thinking grate mines was the hint. The island was a coal mine with grates to keep the POWs working in them!?? :shucks: @ EICH: your :subsim: mailbox needs clearing!

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Done

[Jimbuna]

^ Thanks Jim, now i can :up:



Again thanks @Jim :up:



No problem mate :salute:

[Catfish]

Looks Russian?
Yes, it looks a bit like :O:
But it is not.
Polish PZL.37 bomber?
No.

[Aktungbby]

American?

[Eichhörnchen]

Chinese?

[Jimbuna]

Brewster Consolidated?

[Catfish]

^ no to all three above

[Eichhörnchen]

Was it Allied or Axis?

[Jimbuna]

Twin-engined?

[Aktungbby]

twin or single tailed?:03:

[Catfish]

Was it Allied or Axis?
Yes.

[Catfish]

Twin-engined?
No.

[Catfish]

twin or single tailed?:03:
Single.

[Aktungbby]

allied?

[Catfish]

No.

[Aktungbby]

Nipponese?

[Jimbuna]

Me 323?

[Catfish]

Nipponese?
No..
Me 323?
Afraid not.

But as you may have concluded already it is a german product :yep:

[Eichhörnchen]

Yes - I already wasted about a half-hour earlier looking at "prototype 1930s German bombers" :haha:

Is it a Junkers product?

[mapuc]

Used by another country ?

Markus

[Jimbuna]

Focke-Wulf Fw 189?

[Aktungbby]

Twin-engined?



No.
twin or single tailed?:03:
Single.

Focke-Wulf Fw 189? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Focke_Wulf_Fw189.jpg/450px-Focke_Wulf_Fw189.jpg that's two tailed and two engined??!!:timeout: @ Catish : is this a captured and converted B-17?

[Catfish]

Yes - I already wasted about a half-hour earlier looking at "prototype 1930s German bombers" :haha:
sry :haha: (hint: don't look for bombers)
Is it a Junkers product?
No..

Used by another country ?
Markus
Other than Germany? No.

Focke-Wulf Fw 189?
No, Aktungbby asked if it was twin-tailed and the answer was negative. So not a FW 189.

[...] @ Catish : is this a captured and converted B-17?
Germany did have some (very few) captured intact B-17s for evaluation, but this is not one.

[Eichhörnchen]

Was it put into service or did it remain experimental?

[Catfish]

I read it remained experimental, though there were several built.
I thought they were used in the war but it seems they were not.
The one in the picture has an unusual nose.
(which is why i picked it :03:)

Big hint: There is a connection to the FW 189.
Hint 2: it was intended to be used for a similar task (purpose)

[Eichhörnchen]

Blohm und Voss?

[Catfish]

Oh YES

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/FZL6fiu.jpg

Bv/Ha 141-0 (D-ORJE) - the prototype of the BV 141... you reversed the image too, you crafty devil

[Catfish]

https://i.imgur.com/FZL6fiu.jpg

Bv/Ha 141-0 (D-ORJE) - the prototype of the BV 141... you reversed the image too, you crafty devil
Oh YES :D
The predecessor of the asymmetrical BV 141.
The nose of this early prototype sure was misleading ..

https://i.imgur.com/KlsyEH1l.jpg

Its handling was astonishingly good, it behaved well, easy to start and land, even easy to get out of a spin, but refused due to the weak engine. The proposed BMW engine used in the FW 190 was needed for the latter, so it was not available. Despite the strange looks it was or would have been a formidable recconnaissance plane, but the Focke Wulf 189 was then preferred for this role.

https://www.luftarchiv.de/index.htm?/flugzeuge/blohm-voss/bv141.htm

https://www.historynet.com/blohm-und-voss-bv-141-who-says-both-sides-have-to-match/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV96hXwWN7c

Over to Eichhörnchen :salute:

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/IIgMOyH.jpg Let's have another plane :)

[Jimbuna]

P-51 Mustang?

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Jim - sorry - you were early today & I was busy carving a bit off the image - but I've put it back now :haha:

No, not a Mustang

[Aktungbby]

twin engine?

[Jimbuna]

@ Jim - sorry - you were early today & I was busy carving a bit off the image - but I've put it back now :haha:

No, not a Mustang

No problem but seeing as how I've the ability to 'investigate' forum edits I think it only fair and proper if I withdraw from this particular puzzle.

[Eichhörnchen]

Well there's no need, since I'd only just posted it and effectively nothing has changed

[Jimbuna]

Ah, okay then.

American?

[Eichhörnchen]

Nope

[Aktungbby]

twin engine?

[Jimbuna]

British?

[Eichhörnchen]

Aktung and Jim - both no

[Jimbuna]

German?

[Catfish]

Japanese?

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Jim and Catfish - both negative

[Catfish]

Italian ?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Nope

[Catfish]

Russian?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Yes

[Aktungbby]

WWII fighter?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Nope

[Aktungbby]

post WW II?

[Jimbuna]

Mig family?

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Aktung - yes

@ Jim - no

[Jimbuna]

single engine?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Yes

[Jimbuna]

Four bladed prop?

[Catfish]

Yak?

[Eichhörnchen]

@ Jim - Yes

@ Catfish - No

[Jimbuna]

Was this aircraft actually Russian built?

[Eichhörnchen]

^ Yes

https://i.imgur.com/8BMIQPz.jpg https://i.imgur.com/vnaAuGt.jpg

Here's the whole tail for you - just fill in the middle bit

[Jimbuna]

MSh-AM-38?

Although it is also designated as a Sukhoi SU-14 and Illyushin II-20 depending on what site you visit.

https://i.postimg.cc/CKmdR2X8/pic-40.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

[Eichhörnchen]

https://i.imgur.com/XaCByPi.jpg

Correct - I only spotted it as the IL-20

[Jimbuna]

A strange looking bugga I must say.

Back shortly with something.

[Eichhörnchen]

A strange looking bugga I must say.

Back shortly with something.

It looks to me as though the cockpit was deliberately positioned above the engine so as to protect the pilot. I know that it also had cannons which could be depressed to strafe ground targets whilst remaining in level flight

[Jimbuna]

Not too dissimilar to the Fairey Gannet.

[Jimbuna]

What is this precisely?

https://i.postimg.cc/ydJDZPF8/n-gvcvbvb.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

[Ostfriese]

Some kind of wall?

[Jimbuna]

Not a wall.

[Eichhörnchen]

STEED'S holiday home?

[Aktungbby]

American freighter?

[Jimbuna]

STEED'S holiday home?

Far too posh for that :)

[Jimbuna]

American freighter?

On the right track.

[Eichhörnchen]

So it's merchant marine?

[Jimbuna]

Not merchant marine :)

[Aktungbby]

contract navy vessel?

[Jimbuna]

contract navy vessel?

Not sre what you mean by 'contract' but it was built for the navy.

[Ostfriese]

HMS Caroline?

[Jimbuna]

Not a museum vessel.

[Eichhörnchen]

Is it still in existence ?

[Aktungbby]

Is it still in existence ?...doth it yet abide?:03:

[Jimbuna]

Is it still in existence ?

Yes and is on the news on occasion.

[Jimbuna]

...doth it yet abide?:03:

I'm afraid you'd have to explain precisely in which context you are referring to.

[Aktungbby]

built in the 60's?

[Jimbuna]

Earlier.

[Aktungbby]

was it a 'specific use' vessel?

[Jimbuna]

It was but nothing of a 'specialised' nature.

CLUE: Changed ownership twice since the war.

[Catfish]

Originally built for US navy?

[Jimbuna]

Yes.

[Aktungbby]

by "the war", do you mean WWII?

[Jimbuna]

Yes, WWII

[Aktungbby]

still used in fresh water?

[Jimbuna]

It is a former US Navy vessel built during WWII and has had two owners since being transferred out of the US Navy.

[Aktungbby]

in fresh water?

[Jimbuna]

Sea water.

[Aktungbby]

was it armed?

[Ostfriese]

A Fletcher class destroyer?

[Jimbuna]

was it armed?

Yes but as far as I can ascertain the largest calibre weapon was 40mm

Her two owners after US use may have changed her armament but I'm not sure.

[Jimbuna]

A Fletcher class destroyer?

Nothing as speedy or dashing.

BIG CLUE: Today you'll find her at sea but that doesn't necessarily mean she should be considered as being seaworthy.

[Catfish]

so basically a freighter?

[Rockstar]

John W. Brown?

[Aktungbby]

/\ can't be; the John W. Brown like the other Liberty ship, Jeremiah O'brian at Fisherman's Wharf, SF, is a "museum ship' which Jimbuna has heretofore said the OP is not. Moreover, Liberties pack 6" cannons, considerably heavier than the 40mm already discussed...:hmmm:

[Aktungbby]

gets me: USAS American Mariner: also nicknamed Hannibal after an old target vessel...currently scuttled but visible in Cheasapeake Bay..? Used as target practice. Originally laid down as the Liberty SS George Calvert, it has retained its present name under both subsequent 'owners', the US ARMY and Marine Transportation Service. https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/dcmilitary.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/d/d0/dd03d8ed-a115-524a-9ab9-1a0e2f9f339a/593efe046ad5d.image.jpg?resize=1396%2C924 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAS_American_MarinerThe hull was used for target practice by naval aviators flying out of Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, until at least 1971. Her hull is still visible in the Chesapeake Bay, at 38°02′25″N 76°09′17″W, roughly midway between Point Lookout and Smith Island. She appears to have been the only ship to have served in the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, and the U.S. Navy after being built for service with the United States Merchant Marine.

[Ostfriese]

Moreover, Liberties pack 6" cannons, considerably heavier than the 40mm already discussed...:hmmm:


Never new they had such a heavy armament (a cruiser gun, after all). I've always thought they had something like 76mm or 100mm (3" / 4"), which were sufficient against submarines as well.

[Jimbuna]

so basically a freighter?

Not really, she is a specific type/class.

CLUE: No other ship in the US Navy has been given this name.

[Jimbuna]

John W. Brown?

Afraid not.

CLUE: Roughly half the displacement of the above.

[Jimbuna]

gets me: USAS American Mariner: also nicknamed Hannibal after an old target vessel...currently scuttled but visible in Cheasapeake Bay..? Used as target practice. Originally laid down as the Liberty SS George Calvert, it has retained its present name under both subsequent 'owners', the US ARMY and Marine Transportation Service. https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/dcmilitary.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/d/d0/dd03d8ed-a115-524a-9ab9-1a0e2f9f339a/593efe046ad5d.image.jpg?resize=1396%2C924 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAS_American_Mariner

Easily the closest yet.

[Aktungbby]

Never new they had such a heavy armament (a cruiser gun, after all). I've always thought they had something like 76mm or 100mm (3" / 4"), which were sufficient against submarines as well. My bad;:oops::k_confused: it was a 5" cannon!
Jerimiah O'brien stern gun>https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/SS_Jeremiah_O%27Brien_stern_gun_4.JPG/1200px-SS_Jeremiah_O%27Brien_stern_gun_4.JPG bow gun> https://rachelsruminations.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PC160864-e1515177570823.jpgJohn W Brown>https://eenusa.smugmug.com/photos/314412642_8YdNj-L-1.jpg

[Rockstar]

LST-325?

[Jimbuna]

No but you are the closest yet.

Combine your and Aktungs answer together and you should get it.

[Rockstar]

Was it part of a wartime lend lease program?

[Jimbuna]

Was it part of a wartime lend lease program?

I honestly don't know but think it highly unlikely.

The best clue imho was given @ #4475
BIG CLUE: Today you'll find her at sea but that doesn't necessarily mean she should be considered as being seaworthy.
https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showpost.php?p=2870163&postcount=4475

CLUE: She has had three name changes.

[Rockstar]

Was it transferred to the Philippine government?

[Jimbuna]

Eventually :)

[Ostfriese]

BRP Sierra Madre, a former US, then South Vietnamese and finally Philippine LST, now permanently stationary after being deliberately run aground at the Spratley Islands?

[Aktungbby]

https://laststandonzombieisland.files.wordpress.com/2022/01/brp-sierra-madre-lt-57-christmas-2021-philipines-a.jpg?w=860&h=590 BRP Sierra Madre L-57? formerly the USS Harnett County LST-821? Currently pissin off the Chinese in the South China Sea!:Kaleun_Salute: We should take it back and fly the US flag from it!:arrgh!: Thanks Rockstar for leading me to the promised ....sea!:Kaleun_Salute: EDIT: OOPS! aced out by Ostfriese

[Jimbuna]

BRP Sierra Madre, a former US, then South Vietnamese and finally Philippine LST, now permanently stationary after being deliberately run aground at the Spratley Islands?

That's the one and you beat young Vincent by a whisker :)

https://i.postimg.cc/Bbs6Rn5D/gjkgff-JPG.jpg (https://postimages.org/)

https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/philippine/sea-outpost-11292021150644.html

https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2014/07/world/south-china-sea-dispute/

Over to you :salute:

[Ostfriese]

Well, Rockstars question about the Philippines gave it away.


Right to it, what is this a part of?


https://i.postimg.cc/zfXMznDp/juhu10.jpg

[Aktungbby]

That's the one and you beat young Vincent y a whisker.

Over to you :salute:My own doing actually; I had delayed a tad by posting the pic, flag remark, and 'thanks to Rockstar' Proof: "nice guys finish second!:o:oops::shucks:

[Rockstar]

Well, Rockstars question about the Philippines gave it away.


Right to it, what is this a part of?


https://i.postimg.cc/zfXMznDp/juhu10.jpg

Is it a full dome?

[Ostfriese]

Is it a full dome?


Functionally it is, but it's shape is not a perfect half sphere

[Eichhörnchen]

On an aircraft?

[Ostfriese]

On an aircraft?


^No.

[Jimbuna]

A car?