Skybird
12-05-20, 07:34 AM
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.achgut.com%2Fartikel%2Fpopulae re_fleischirrtuemer_falschalarm_regenwaldvernichte r
We idiots in Europe think that we do oh so much good by condemning palm oil and avpoiding to eat meat. But our position is filled with contradictions and factual untruths. And in the end we burn food for producing industrial fuel and grease, think we drive the energy evoklution that way, and make no difference at all for the ecology.
A pattern we repeat in so many different variations, don't we, namely food, eating habits, medications and the public desease system.
You cannot feed 8+ bn people with the Green's ideas on how to do it, or the nutrionists' ideas about it. There is not enough fertile ground for agricultural use on the planet anymore (we destroyed most of it by now), there is not enough fish in the sea (if fish farms are considered a no go). Not for 8+ bn. 1- 1.5 bn, maybe. Not more.
We have turned ourselves into rats in a cage who bred their population beyond the limit. Pollution, lack of food, degrading health, aggression, and finally mutual killing must be the unavoidable results. And our progressives and Lefties and establishments and Greens all contriubute their stupdity to help this project gping forward. Thats why I do not favour any of them over the other.
Moral of the story: I enjoy palm oil where I meet it (nugat creme :) ), its one of the healthier oils available. Better avoid every kind of plant seed oil, and every oil and fat rising the Omega-6 in your system. And all that condemning of palm oil I just bitterly laugh about. I prefer Coconut oil, olive oil and fish oil for even better health, but nobody will talk me into a bad conscience when I also use palm oil. People and countries who destroy nutrious food to make engine fuel and grease of it, have lost any moral position to lecture.
We idiots in Europe think that we do oh so much good by condemning palm oil and avpoiding to eat meat. But our position is filled with contradictions and factual untruths. And in the end we burn food for producing industrial fuel and grease, think we drive the energy evoklution that way, and make no difference at all for the ecology.
A pattern we repeat in so many different variations, don't we, namely food, eating habits, medications and the public desease system.
You cannot feed 8+ bn people with the Green's ideas on how to do it, or the nutrionists' ideas about it. There is not enough fertile ground for agricultural use on the planet anymore (we destroyed most of it by now), there is not enough fish in the sea (if fish farms are considered a no go). Not for 8+ bn. 1- 1.5 bn, maybe. Not more.
We have turned ourselves into rats in a cage who bred their population beyond the limit. Pollution, lack of food, degrading health, aggression, and finally mutual killing must be the unavoidable results. And our progressives and Lefties and establishments and Greens all contriubute their stupdity to help this project gping forward. Thats why I do not favour any of them over the other.
Moral of the story: I enjoy palm oil where I meet it (nugat creme :) ), its one of the healthier oils available. Better avoid every kind of plant seed oil, and every oil and fat rising the Omega-6 in your system. And all that condemning of palm oil I just bitterly laugh about. I prefer Coconut oil, olive oil and fish oil for even better health, but nobody will talk me into a bad conscience when I also use palm oil. People and countries who destroy nutrious food to make engine fuel and grease of it, have lost any moral position to lecture.