View Full Version : The Voter Fraud That Is The Democrat Party
It seems the dead will rise to vote democrat ,, because no sane person will,, maybe if you hang around the polls you might catch up with some passed Relatives,, http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/05/25/cbs-uncovers-voter-fraud-in-la-n2168330
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/024/779/ac8.gif
Jimbuna
10-01-16, 07:43 AM
Okay, you've now got my spider senses tingling.
http://i.imgur.com/5ijYnsT.gif
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/young-virginia-democrat-registers-19-dead-people-vote-hillary/
AndyJWest
10-01-16, 10:16 AM
http://addictinginfo.org/2013/06/21/shocker-republicans-account-for-most-cases-of-u-s-voter-fraud/
Gray Lensman
10-01-16, 01:32 PM
http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/2012fraud.asp
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=2143
Platapus
10-01-16, 01:59 PM
It seems the dead will rise to vote democrat ,, because no sane person will,, maybe if you hang around the polls you might catch up with some passed Relatives,, http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/05/25/cbs-uncovers-voter-fraud-in-la-n2168330
And I am confident it was an innocent oversight that you neglected to recognize that voters from both sides have taken advantage of the unacceptable conduct of these specific election officials.
Voter fraud is not a democratic nor a republican problem. it is an American problem that we all need to work together to solve.
Buddahaid
10-01-16, 02:16 PM
And I am confident it was an innocent oversight that you neglected to recognize that voters from both sides have taken advantage of the unacceptable conduct of these specific election officials.
Voter fraud is not a democratic nor a republican problem. it is an American problem that we all need to work together to solve.
Don't waste your time trying to use reason here. Do something productive with your day.
Platapus
10-01-16, 06:57 PM
Yeah, what waz I thinkin? :03:
https://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/hacked-hillary-makes-fun-of-bernie-voters-in-leaked-audio-recording
AndyJWest
10-01-16, 07:47 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/basementdwellers-the-actual-words-and-spin-on-hillary-clintons-remarks-about-bernie-sanders-supporters-205428290.html
“Some are new to politics completely. They’re children of the Great Recession and they are living in their parents’ basement. They feel they got their education, and the jobs that are available to them are not at all what they envisioned for themselves, and they don’t see much of a future,” Clinton said. “I met with a group of young black millennials today, and, you know, one of the young women said, ‘You know, none of us feel like we have the job that we should have gotten out of college, and we don’t believe the job market is going to give us much of a chance.'”
A poor choice of words perhaps, but the spin the 'conservative outfitters' website put on it is entirely predictable, and obviously misleading. No surprise there.
One might ask however why Yubba thinks it appropriate to post off-topic links in a thread he started. Is he conceding that he's lost the original argument, or is he getting commission (or a free T-shirt) from the outfitters? Just asking... :03:
Don't waste your time trying to use reason here. Do something productive with your day.
This thread needs more squirrels...where's Eichhörnchen? :hmmm:
Gray Lensman
10-01-16, 08:12 PM
And I am confident it was an innocent oversight that you neglected to recognize that voters from both sides have taken advantage of the unacceptable conduct of these specific election officials.
Voter fraud is not a democratic nor a republican problem. it is an American problem that we all need to work together to solve.
It does seem awful suspicious that when common sense photo voter ID laws are proposed that would help prevent voter fraud no matter what party the voters are from, that for some reason the Democrats always matter to come up with the lame excuses and legalistic roadblocks. I don't read anything about Republicans blocking voter ID laws. i.e. which party is trying to hide something?
I have to use a photo ID to drive (I presume most states require it)! If I want to fly, I have to present an acceptable photo ID at the airport. These are just a couple examples of common sense uses of photo ID and states that ask to implement them even offer to provide them for free, but somehow the Democrats seem to see these measures as suppressing the vote and unfair to minorities. Why are they not unfair to minorities when required to drive or fly? Why the fake outrage and over the top opposition to photo voter ID?
It's really pretty easy for us to see the phoniness in the opposition to these measures and there is plenty of documentation available from the Secretaries of States of most states that voter fraud does occur and in great numbers so the argument that voter fraud does not really occur is an empty argument also.
Platapus
10-01-16, 08:55 PM
Oh I agree. As a precinct chief, I like the photo ID law as long as everyone has ample opportunity to get the ID. I too find it hard to believe that there are people in today's society that have no acceptable Photo ID.
I think that all the states should adopt the same system that Virginia does. They make it as easy to get a voter ID as possible and there is no cost to the citizen. In Virginia you can even get a photo ID after the election and your vote will still count.
This guy seems to have an obsessive compulsive disorder issue.
...or clearly has one ;)
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/young-virginia-democrat-registers-19-dead-people-vote-hillary/
I saw that online the other day. She'll do anything to win. Even lie, steal, and cheat. :yep:
em2nought
10-02-16, 01:38 AM
If we can't even agree to having voter photo ID, then I think we just need to burn it all down. :up:
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjAwMjU1MTA4N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNzAxNTc3NA@@._ V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_.jpg
http://topbuzzapp.com/article/i6342487400823915011?app_id=1106
Takeda Shingen
10-17-16, 10:15 PM
It would seem that voter fraud is not required to defeat Donald Trump.
Mr Quatro
10-17-16, 10:30 PM
I saw that online the other day. She'll do anything to win. Even lie, steal, and cheat. :yep:
Odd! That's exactly what John McCain said about President Obama when they were running against each other.:yep:
It would seem that voter fraud is not required to defeat Donald Trump.
True, but google Donald Trump supporters anger and use that word anger.
Lots to read over there ... they might not like the results of this election.
If this thread stays on voter fraud I think yubba did the right thing having it's own thread. :up:
The way I look at it, if you have to make up so many conspiracy theories as to why you're losing...then perhaps it's time to stop blaming others and take a look a bit closer to home.
I'm not saying the Dems are spotless, sure there's likely to be a fair bit of corruption at most levels, but like I've said...this election was the Republicans to win, and it's not Democratic jiggery-pokery that's going to lose them it.
Of course, that's not going to matter to the Alex Jones crowd, who seem to be the main demographic that Trump is going for now. There's no reasoning when you're that deep in the tin foil. :nope:
I read, not so long time ago, a twitter on FB where some postal workers had bragged about having destroyed some Trump-letters(postal votes I guess it was)
When I read this, I got mad. I hope this worker will be called to a "serious" talk with the boss.
Markus
The way I look at it, if you have to make up so many conspiracy theories as to why you're losing...then perhaps it's time to stop blaming others and take a look a bit closer to home.
I'm not saying the Dems are spotless, sure there's likely to be a fair bit of corruption at most levels, but like I've said...this election was the Republicans to win, and it's not Democratic jiggery-pokery that's going to lose them it.
Of course, that's not going to matter to the Alex Jones crowd, who seem to be the main demographic that Trump is going for now. There's no reasoning when you're that deep in the tin foil. :nope:
I'd say it depends on the theory. It's certainly no theory that the corporate media has picked a favorite and are doing everything they can to make her win the election.
I'd say it depends on the theory. It's certainly no theory that the corporate media has picked a favorite and are doing everything they can to make her win the election.
What corporate media though, I mean what about the likes of Fox News? I'd wager that they're not shilling for Hill, but probably trying to get as many GOP candidates into the House and Congress as they can.
I don't think the media has so much picked a favourite but more that they've found a much more jucey reliable source for news stories. I mean, there's Hillarys emails which take a fair bit of digging through and is mostly fairly dry, or there's a sex scandal with the walking soundbite machine that is Donald Trump, if you're looking for viewers who would you pick? Because it's a two-way thing with media, if people don't view it then they won't show it, so who is really to blame? :hmmm:
I mean what about the likes of Fox News? I'd wager that they're not shilling for Hill, but probably trying to get as many GOP candidates into the House and Congress as they can.
Fox only seems to be right leaning since the others, ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN lean so much to the left and now that Ailes has been given the boot i'd expect that Fox will be joining them.
Fox only seems to be right leaning since the others, ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN lean so much to the left and now that Ailes has been given the boot i'd expect that Fox will be joining them.
Interesting, I wonder if that is an indication of a leftward shift in US politics? I mean, it rolls both ways, if people weren't watching it then there wouldn't be the ratings, so obviously the media is doing something right, even if it's left.
Mr Quatro
10-18-16, 01:15 PM
Fox only seems to be right leaning since the others, ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN lean so much to the left and now that Ailes has been given the boot i'd expect that Fox will be joining them.
Ailes? Is that the Fox news director that had a sex problem?
Seems odd that Trump and Ailes had sex problems with women, plus Fox News relationship with Trump has always been to defend Trump.
Just odd that's all :yep:
Ailes? Is that the Fox news director that had a sex problem?
Seems odd that Trump and Ailes had sex problems with women, plus Fox News relationship with Trump has always been to defend Trump.
Just odd that's all :yep:
So did Kennedy and just about every other president in modern times including the sainted FDR. Power is an aphrodisiac but only one party really gets their feet held to the fire over it. Sexual Predator in Chief Bill Clinton is a prime example of that.
Buddahaid
10-18-16, 01:27 PM
I keep hearing how the media is all on the left smearing our man Trump and propping up Hillary by not smearing her. What I fail to understand is why the right can't create just the opposite type of mainstream media? Is it just anything left of extreme right viewed as all left, or perhaps it's just too small of a base to survive?
Interesting, I wonder if that is an indication of a leftward shift in US politics? I mean, it rolls both ways, if people weren't watching it then there wouldn't be the ratings, so obviously the media is doing something right, even if it's left.
Well I think it's an indication of the political leanings of the people that run these media empires more than anything else. But as for ratings and viewers, FOX is the most widely watched newscaster and has been for years. It's just that they are only one voice of many.
I keep hearing how the media is all on the left smearing our man Trump and propping up Hillary by not smearing her. What I fail to understand is why the right can't create just the opposite type of mainstream media? Is it just anything left of extreme right viewed as all left, or perhaps it's just too small of a base to survive?
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6
Those who support Trump claims that media is on Clinton's side. Those who support Clinton reject each claimed distortion of the media and the other way around, of course.
Markus
Well I think it's an indication of the political leanings of the people that run these media empires more than anything else. But as for ratings and viewers, FOX is the most widely watched newscaster and has been for years. It's just that they are only one voice of many.
FOX is our old friend Murdoch isn't it? He doesn't strike me as a leftie, perhaps more of a person in despair at the GOPs struggle to organise itself. However, if you were to have FOX as the only right-leaning agency in a sea of left leaning media, then the fish swimming in that sea have to be predominantly left leaning in order for those media networks to keep going and keep having ratings, even if those ratings aren't as high as FOX, and perhaps the reason they're not is that the left-leaning audience is spread over multiple networks rather than focused on one like FOX. If there was just FOX and CNN perhaps then there might be a bigger audience on CNN.
And, one thing aside, they say that air time is the most precious time at all for a candidate, you can't deny that Donald Trump has had his name on every single newscasters lips for the past election cycle, right from the primaries up until now. It's not always been in a positive light, even as far back as the primaries, most of the air-time was negative, but it was still air time.
I was just watching O'Reilly on The Late Show and he made some good points for the next debate, Trump needs to stop whining and stay on message, get some specifics about his plans out (if he has any) and don't go low, because people are getting tired of low.
AVGWarhawk
10-18-16, 01:45 PM
Voter fraud happens. My BIL went to vote in the last local elections. He was told he voted already earlier that day when he had not.
AVGWarhawk
10-18-16, 01:48 PM
Those who support Trump claims that media is on Clinton's side. Those who support Clinton reject each claimed distortion of the media and the other way around, of course.
Markus
Well, Trump does have a disproportionate amount of self imposed negative news. The media loves to play on it A LOT. However, Hillary is getting bad PR from WikiLeaks. This news is generally presented after the Trump craziness of the day. I have a program that pulls stories from every major media outlet. It displays 20 stores. I counted the Trump stories over the regular stories. 16 were on Trump. 4 on nothing much. 0 concerned Hillary.
Mr Quatro
10-18-16, 02:03 PM
Well, Trump does have a disproportionate amount of self imposed negative news. The media loves to play on it A LOT. However, Hillary is getting bad PR from WikiLeaks. This news is generally presented after the Trump craziness of the day. I have a program that pulls stories from every major media outlet. It displays 20 stores. I counted the Trump stories over the regular stories. 16 were on Trump. 4 on nothing much. 0 concerned Hillary.
I have in the past played roulette with my remote control for all for of the major news networks. I've seen Trump doing a live rally on Fox and CNN, but it was not on NBC. I have seen Hillary do a live rally on CNN and NBC, but it wasn't on Fox.
Then there's the panel of experts, talk about prejudice, they always use a nerd for the candidate they don't like. It's just not plain obvious to everyone or I see it different.
What have we done here, this is suppose to be about voter fraud or the claims of it at least. :o
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6
So, let's look at those six.
GE, Newscorp (shudder), Disney, Viacom, Time Warner and CBS.
GE sponsored Ronnie back in the 1950s, but they tend to go for progressive programs, and they seem to have cash connections to Hillary so let's go that they're Democrat.
Murdoch is a bit centrist, but has generally supported Republicans, but he might have been a bit turned off by Trumps immigration policies since he tends to be more in favour of open borders. We'll keep him with the Republicans for now though.
Disney, well, that's Iger who is fundraising for Hillary so we can definitely put them in the Clinton camp.
Viacom has Redstone who is a Democrat funder, but he's 93 so who else is there, Thomas Dooley...wikipedia doesn't have much on him, but Nicole Seligman seems pretty Democrat, especially Clinton democrat, so might as well chalk that one up to Democrat.
Time Warner...Time Warner... Jeff Bewkes, seems a bit liberal this one, European parents so that's going to automatically make him more liberal than the average American, and he seems to have associated with 'Free thinkers and lunatic fringe types' during his Uni years. He also has Gary Ginsberg with him, a lawyer for the Clintons back in the day...buuuuuuuut, Ginsberg is also a speech-writer for Netanyahu and you can't really call Bibi a liberal. So put him in neutral. Throw onto that fact that Time Warner back in 2005 put forward money for Dubyas second inaugeration. This was two years before Bewkes though so, oh...hang on, I see now that they've put big money towards Hillarys campaign, so that slides them onto her side.
And CBS, with Leslie Moonves, ah yes, the man who killed Enterprise...well, perhaps put it out of its misery might be a better term. He doesn't seem to be fully on Trumps side, but he's certainly appreciative of the train-wreck that this election has become because of the ad revenue he's getting from it. Full on Chaotic Neutral. Jeff Fager is the head of the News section of things, it's hard to find something non-partisan on him, so I'll put CBS as neutral but leaning left on this one.
So out of that six there's three definite Democrat, two probably Democrat, and one probably Republican. So yeah, I can see what you mean August, and that's a real mess...I hope to God that British media never gets that bad.
AVGWarhawk
10-18-16, 02:24 PM
I have in the past played roulette with my remote control for all for of the major news networks. I've seen Trump doing a live rally on Fox and CNN, but it was not on NBC. I have seen Hillary do a live rally on CNN and NBC, but it wasn't on Fox.
Then there's the panel of experts, talk about prejudice, they always use a nerd for the candidate they don't like. It's just not plain obvious to everyone or I see it different.
What have we done here, this is suppose to be about voter fraud or the claims of it at least. :o
There definitely is something to the media bias complaint. CNN is the Clinton New Network. FOX is all about Trump unless your name is Megan Kelly. MSNBC is all about Hillary in a big way. Most of these news outlets are opinion journalism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY
Platapus
10-18-16, 04:53 PM
Voter fraud happens. My BIL went to vote in the last local elections. He was told he voted already earlier that day when he had not.
Did he find out what happened? Was it an oversight, a mistake. Not everything is a big conspiracy.
Did he cast a provisional ballot and then challenge at the election board at the provisional hearing?
Onkel Neal
10-18-16, 08:45 PM
Those who support Trump claims that media is on Clinton's side. Those who support Clinton reject each claimed distortion of the media and the other way around, of course.
Markus
I'm pretty sure it's beyond true that the media is helping Clinton. Not even Trump is helping himself.
Buddahaid
10-19-16, 12:10 AM
Sure seems he's trying to sabotage his own campaign lately. Cold feet?
em2nought
10-19-16, 01:47 AM
Did he find out what happened? Was it an oversight, a mistake. Not everything is a big conspiracy.
Did he cast a provisional ballot and then challenge at the election board at the provisional hearing?
Yeah, what happened? I think you'd see steam come out of my ears if I was told that. Probably with a pressure cooker whistle sound to accompany it. :arrgh!:
AVGWarhawk
10-19-16, 09:54 AM
Did he find out what happened? Was it an oversight, a mistake. Not everything is a big conspiracy.
Did he cast a provisional ballot and then challenge at the election board at the provisional hearing?
He was told to pack it in he can not vote. He asked if a ID was requested from the person who used his name. NO ID was asked for. Welcome to the fraud. Although protested at the time of discovery he was asked to leave the building.
No provisional ballot cast. Election Board not contacted. Waste of time.
The current system for voting is wide open for voting fraud.
clive bradbury
10-19-16, 10:08 AM
Just a few questions regarding the recent trends:
1. If Trump wins (he says he will - so it must be true), what will he say about voter fraud then?
2. If voter fraud is a major problem (all the research, from both sides of the political spectrum, says that it is not), why is that seen as an advantage purely for the democrats? Can't both sides commit fraud? Is Trump getting his excuses in early?
3. When has media NOT been biased politically? If you think it's bad there - try the UK.
4. How do the critics of media bias on here (I'm guessing mostly Republican), account for the several strongly Republican newspapers who have encouraged their readers not to vote Republican because Trump is the candidate? Democrat conspiracy?
AVGWarhawk
10-19-16, 11:17 AM
Just a few questions regarding the recent trends:
1. If Trump wins (he says he will - so it must be true), what will he say about voter fraud then?
2. If voter fraud is a major problem (all the research, from both sides of the political spectrum, says that it is not), why is that seen as an advantage purely for the democrats? Can't both sides commit fraud? Is Trump getting his excuses in early?
3. When has media NOT been biased politically? If you think it's bad there - try the UK.
4. How do the critics of media bias on here (I'm guessing mostly Republican), account for the several strongly Republican newspapers who have encouraged their readers not to vote Republican because Trump is the candidate? Democrat conspiracy?
1. Trump will say the boys in Vegas fixed the fraud. He got people. It will be great. LOl
2. Both sides can commit fraud but I have only read instances of dead Democrats who managed to vote Democrat from the grave.
3. Media has alway been bias. Issue is it has never really been addressed or corrected.
4. It is not really an encouragement to vote "their" person. It is more towards discouraging voting the other guy/gal with negative attacks on a consistent relentless basis. The media is still harping on Trumps groping hands and just now scratching the surface digging into the damning emails for the DNC and Clinton campaign.
Mr Quatro
10-19-16, 12:01 PM
If there is any major fraud ... I would think it would be in the absentee voting wouldn't you? That's the only place you could rack up enough votes to count for your side and as far as I know they are not even counted till after the election and except in a few cases have never made a difference.
I know all about Bush and Gore in Florida so don't include that one. :D
Can't figure out if my comment belong in this thread or in our Presidential election thread.
About a week ago I saw someone had linked an article in which it said-that a riot will occur if Trump loose the election I saw the URL address and it looked like a site that wasn't "legit"
Then, today in a Swedish news paper, which is more serious, I read almost the same thing-The news paper, had an expert on American politics saying that a riot could be real if Trump is not elected.
Markus
AVGWarhawk
10-19-16, 02:42 PM
Can't figure out if my comment belong in this thread or in our Presidential election thread.
About a week ago I saw someone had linked an article in which it said-that a riot will occur if Trump loose the election I saw the URL address and it looked like a site that wasn't "legit"
Then, today in a Swedish news paper, which is more serious, I read almost the same thing-The news paper, had an expert on American politics saying that a riot could be real if Trump is not elected.
Markus
Yes. In the news here it is suggested that there will some rioting if Hillary or Trump wins. The local police are preparing for this activity if it presents itself.
Riots even if Trump wins the election !? That was a something I hadn't heard of before.
Markus
Riots even if Trump wins the election !? That was a something I hadn't heard of before.
Markus
Yup, no matter who wins America will lose, this has been coming for a looooooooong time.
"At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide"
If riots should happen I expect it will be people mostly from the far right or left who will start to through stones and other things in their despair.
I don't think the ordinary Americans will take part-Maybe not in the beginning if those riots grow and/or continue.
I could be wrong
A second thing the sentence you had Quoted. I read almost the same story day before yesterday, but here it had been mixed with-Here Nostradamus and last time of election i USA had been added.
Markus
A second thing the sentence you had Quoted. I read almost the same story day before yesterday, but here it had been mixed with-Here Nostradamus and last time of election i USA had been added.
Markus
It was Lincoln, in 1838.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln%27s_Lyceum_address
Another famous one of his was twenty years later, when he took the nomination of the Illinois Republican party for senator, and through part of that speech he took from the bible, and I think it's something that like his Lyceum address, is still relevant to this day although along more issues than those he directly campaigned against.
A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South.
And the quote from the Bible, from the Gospel of Matthew 12:25
25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto him, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:
AVGWarhawk
10-19-16, 03:19 PM
Riots even if Trump wins the election !? That was a something I hadn't heard of before.
Markus
Recall the Trump rallies? Who were the fine folks bodily blocking the highways? The fine folks who are carried out of the rallies? The fun loving Democrat. That's who.
US 2016 election:
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/51280010.jpg
AVGWarhawk
10-19-16, 03:26 PM
US 2016 election:
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/51280010.jpg
I don't know about all of that but I can tell you Pee Wee loves diddling himself in the movie theaters. :doh:
I don't know about all of that but I can tell you Pee Wee loves diddling himself in the movie theaters. :doh:
It's got to be more entertaining than thinking about the future, isn't it? :hmmm:
em2nought
10-19-16, 03:40 PM
Recall the Trump rallies? Who were the fine folks bodily blocking the highways? The fine folks who are carried out of the rallies? The fun loving Democrat. That's who.
Yeah, but they probably wouldn't continue getting paid once the election is over if Trump loses. :up:
If voting is compromised, what makes democrats think that all their supposedly supporting research for all their favorite money expenditures isn't compromised as well?
I'll give them that military spending is corrupted just like Ike warned. :salute:
Platapus
10-19-16, 03:41 PM
as far as I know they are not even counted till after the election
I can only opine on my own state, but in Virginia all absentee votes are counted.
Tchocky
10-19-16, 03:44 PM
Recall the Trump rallies? Who were the fine folks bodily blocking the highways? The fine folks who are carried out of the rallies? The fun loving Democrat. That's who.
Yes.
Some Democratic activists and supporters are idiots.
Some Republican activists and supporters are idiots.
This is not news and to label an entire party by actions of a few is silly.
Recall the Trump rallies? Who were the fine folks bodily blocking the highways? The fine folks who are carried out of the rallies? The fun loving Democrat. That's who.
Now that you mention it I recall some of it
Not where they blocked the highway(s) I recall some Trump supportes got a bloody nose in some rally meeting.
I was thinking more like throwing stones, Molotov Cocktails and other things against the police, shopping windows a.s.o
Markus
em2nought
10-19-16, 03:55 PM
He was told to pack it in he can not vote. He asked if a ID was requested from the person who used his name. NO ID was asked for. Welcome to the fraud. Although protested at the time of discovery he was asked to leave the building.
No provisional ballot cast. Election Board not contacted. Waste of time.
The current system for voting is wide open for voting fraud.
So now that he's been disenfranchised I guess he doesn't have to pay taxes anymore? :har:
Coming back to the news media, I've been picking up some rumours that in the event that Trump loses the election he will be starting up his own channel, so that'll be something for those who think FOX is going too liberal to turn to I guess. I bet he'll sign on Alex Jones too. :hmmm:
EDIT: Rumour has it Sean Hannity is top on the list for TrumpTV, perhaps O'Reilly too.
AVGWarhawk
10-20-16, 08:59 AM
Now that you mention it I recall some of it
Not where they blocked the highway(s) I recall some Trump supportes got a bloody nose in some rally meeting.
I was thinking more like throwing stones, Molotov Cocktails and other things against the police, shopping windows a.s.o
Markus
It has been found(via hidden camera) that the DNC planted people to cause problems at Trump rallies. The DNC are not fun loving people as they like to appear to be.
The throwing of stones and burning cars are a distinct possibility. However, I do not feel this type of activity will come from Trump supporters if Trump should loose(and he will).
AVGWarhawk
10-20-16, 09:00 AM
Coming back to the news media, I've been picking up some rumours that in the event that Trump loses the election he will be starting up his own channel, so that'll be something for those who think FOX is going too liberal to turn to I guess. I bet he'll sign on Alex Jones too. :hmmm:
EDIT: Rumour has it Sean Hannity is top on the list for TrumpTV, perhaps O'Reilly too.
I can see Trump funding his own channel. I can also see Trumps being a thorn in Hillary's side for the entire 4 years. It will be ugly.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/29/voter-fraud-arrests-key-swing-states-florida-virginia
AVGWarhawk
10-29-16, 09:16 PM
My daughter voted in the early voting. Those running the early voting asked for name and address. NO picture ID was asked. This is simply wrong.
Buddahaid
10-29-16, 10:54 PM
I can't help but feel we are all being played for suckers. Vote your conscience.
em2nought
10-30-16, 02:26 AM
I guess we'll know something is truly fishy when Trump get zero votes, and Hillary gets 500,000,000. :D
em2nought
10-30-16, 07:26 AM
Absentee ballots being used to disenfranchise senior, likely more conservative, voters. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html
Platapus
10-30-16, 07:56 AM
Mail-in ballots and other types of absentee ballots is a compromise.
One could say that if you can't make it to the polling location, you should not be able to vote. But that is unfair, and probably illegal.
So a compromise system of mail-in ballots and other forms of absentee voting is created. Like any compromise, there are risks.
Do the advantages of absentee voting methods out weigh the risks?
I think they do.
Sometimes I think we should adopt the system used in some third-world countries of inking fingers. It could be considered a patriotic sign to have a purple finger on election day like wearing a "I voted" sticker. Sometimes the simplest solutions are the bestest.
How do we manage to have relatively scandal free voting processes and you guys always have some kind of controversy? :hmmm: Biggest problems we have had recently have been a bit of an expenses issue and concerns over 'Political Correctness'™ affecting voting in Muslim areas. :hmmm:
em2nought
10-30-16, 03:14 PM
Wonderful news! Illegals and non-citizens voting in large numbers https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2016/10/non-citizen-illegally-voting/
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/pennsylvania-state-police-raid-registration-offices-voter-fraud-sting/
I can post non-mainstream media links too!
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/this-election-is-being-rigged-but-not-by-hillary-clinton-w448638
How do we manage to have relatively scandal free voting processes and you guys always have some kind of controversy? :hmmm: Biggest problems we have had recently have been a bit of an expenses issue and concerns over 'Political Correctness'™ affecting voting in Muslim areas. :hmmm:
If these folks that we give the public trust to would abide to their God sworn oath,, we wouldn't have this problem.. Liberalism=Corruption he who laughs last laughs best. HA
he who laughs last laughs best. HA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca9GuwuOVZc
Get it right.
[QUOTE=Oberon;2444585]I can post non-mainstream media links too!
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/this-election-is-being-rigged-but-not-by-hillary-clinton-w448638[/QUOTE
Would you seriously think the mainstream media would report such a thing it would have to go pass daddy Soros first ,, by the way hows the invasion going over there I told you years ago you might consider getting fitted for a prayer rug.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca9GuwuOVZc
Get it right.
tootles
addy Soros first ,,
Aaaah, the George Soros conspiracy...a favourite. Bravo.
Is this before or after he rigged 9/11? I've lost track.
Aaaah, the George Soros conspiracy...a favourite. Bravo.
Is this before or after he rigged 9/11? I've lost track.
at least I'm not alone in thinking so.. http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/27/white-house-petition-to-remove-soros-owned-voting-machines-rockets-past-signature-goal/ how's that prayer rug coming a long ???
at least I'm not alone in thinking so.. ?
Of course not, Alex Jones will lead you to the promised land. :up:
The rugs are coming along fine, very comfy.
Of course not, Alex Jones will lead you to the promised land. :up:
The rugs are coming along fine, very comfy.
It is a shame that I have to go Alex Jones to get the news,, but Rush,, Hannity ,,and Levin do get the info out they are not as far out as Alex,but I like his commitment,,.. I might not be the the sharpest knife in the drawer,, but I do know a invasion when I see it.
but I do know a invasion when I see it.
Of the lizard people? Mexicans? Or is the UN again? :hmmm:
No, no, don't tell me, Hilary has taken over Obamas secret FEMA dentist stormtroopers and is using them to rig the election? That's why all the plastic coffins appeared, they have voters in them which they're smuggling into voting centers via tunnels dug by Tibetan monks? :hmmm:
AndyJWest
11-05-16, 11:20 AM
'Invasion'
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/Landing_of_the_pilgrims%2C_December_21%2C_1620._Pl ymouth%2C_Mass_%2861536%29.jpg/320px-Landing_of_the_pilgrims%2C_December_21%2C_1620._Pl ymouth%2C_Mass_%2861536%29.jpg
A dodgy bunch of characters clearly arriving to take the jobs of the locals and impose their own alien religious laws. Send em back...
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.