View Full Version : MS804
An Egyptair flight from Paris to Cairo has disappeared from radar and has likely gone down in the Mediterrainean at some point between Cyprus and Egypt.
Live updates from the Beeb here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-africa-36328976
I have a horrid feeling that the mods will be able to roll this over into the 'All Purpose Terrorism' thread in the near future given the aircrafts departure and destination points, but for now I'll put this seperately.
Catfish
05-19-16, 02:13 AM
Just read this.. :nope:
Sources i read spoke of three persons belonging to security personnel, onboard.
And the other malaysian plane that went missing in indonesian/chinese waters some months ago has not been found up to now, and nobody knows what happened?
Maybe time for a better transponder/positioning device fitted to passenger planes.
And the other malaysian plane that went missing in indonesian/chinese waters some months ago has not been found up to now, and nobody knows what happened?
Maybe time for a better transponder/positioning device fitted to passenger planes.
They have found bits of wreckage of MH370, but probably not enough to actually determine the cause of the aircrafts loss.
Sadly, some aircraft losses will remain a mystery, heck, there's an entire Boeing 727 that someone stole which has been missing for 13 years. :doh:
Jimbuna
05-19-16, 05:46 AM
The more incidents I learn of such as this reminds me of my lad who insists on only flying BA on his regular travels.
That is his mindset anyway.
Onkel Neal
05-19-16, 09:05 AM
An Egyptair flight from Paris to Cairo has disappeared from radar and has likely gone down in the Mediterrainean at some point between Cyprus and Egypt.
Live updates from the Beeb here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-africa-36328976
I have a horrid feeling that the mods will be able to roll this over into the 'All Purpose Terrorism' thread in the near future given the aircrafts departure and destination points, but for now I'll put this seperately.
Why is it a "horrid" feeling?
Schroeder
05-19-16, 09:07 AM
Why is it a "horrid" feeling?
The horrid feeling is that this might not have been an accident but a terror strike.
Catfish
05-19-16, 09:09 AM
^ Some egyptian officials have just said that, but no evidence published (yet).
Onkel Neal
05-19-16, 09:16 AM
The horrid feeling is that this might not have been an accident but a terror strike.
I misread it, my apologies
Skybird
05-19-16, 11:23 AM
Me too thinks a terror strike is the most likely scenario, for two reasons.
First, if there is no distress call that got sent, whatever happened must have happened very fast. Engine fires and malfunctions usually do not lead that quickly to penultimate desaster that pilot and copilt cannot even release an emergency call. Which leaves some kind of explosive decompression as the top explanation.
Second, we are approaching summer holidays slowly but surely, and a major international sports event. And Muslim terror is locked in a fight with the Egyptian state for which tourism is a major source of income. Any attack reducing that income, is a blow to the Egyptian state.
Also there already have been attempted and successful attacks on airliners in Egypt recently.
From a Muslim terrorists POV , the chosen target makes sense. Plus revenge for Mursi and the MB, and all that.
Russian FSB also claims it to be a terror strike, but gives no evidence.
Other scenarios are possible explanations as well at this point of time. But the terror theory has the highest realistic probability of all possible scenarios one could imagine, currently. And the aircraft model, an A320, has a remarkable technical reliability record.
Yeah, I think that it is the most likely explanation, however there are a lot of questions which hold me off being absolutely sure, the descent spiral just before the plunge into the sea and the fact that it took off from Charles de Gaulle airport and headed towards Egypt rather than the other way around.
Given that France has received two terror attacks and there's been an attack on a European airport fairly recently you'd expect security to be pretty tight at Charles de Gaulle.
The descent spiral, as shown in this Beeb graphic:
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/512/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2016/5/19/e5b87ea0-c659-48d8-8432-fedaa6aee536.png
seem as though perhaps someone was still trying to keep control of it, however it's equally just possible that this was just the way the wind was affecting the aircrafts glide path as it descended out of control.
Sadly terrorism is the most likely option, although it is strange that no-one has claimed responsibility for it yet, normally Daesh and their ilk are all over something like this but they've been quiet, I guess it's possible that they're holding back while their operative gets clear, but who can say?
Either which way, a very tragic day.
Catfish
05-20-16, 03:37 AM
There was that Air France Flight from South America. Ice had rendered all tachometer devices useless, and the autopilot tried to counter with the data it received. When the jet lost altitude it gave positive elevator control and the nose went up until stalling.
The pilots did not know what was going on and were not able to switch from automatic to manual steering. A stall, drop and circling could be a hint for a similar technical failure.
Just saying.
Von Due
05-20-16, 04:53 AM
Until they find some hard evidence, it might be a good idea, like been posted above, to think of all the things that can lead to something like this.
Deliberate actions by crew: A flight engineer attacked both pilots of Federal Express flight 705 with hammer and speargun in murder/suicide attempt. The pilots did successfully return though and the guy was arrested, tried and sentenced. Germanwings Flight 9525 saw the pilot commit murder/suicide.
Malfunctions. It is possible albeit extremely unlikely that the plane lost all electric power/radio/communications for some bizarre reason. Ice can cause sudden crashes. Ground maintenance errors like forgetting to remove duct tape covering the pitot tubes.
Structural: Airliners have disintegrated for no immediate apparent reason while in the air before. Comet, the first jet airliner (design flaw), China Airlines flight 611 (improper, previous repairs) and more.
Terrorism: Is a candidate too.
A good summary there Von Due, hopefully now that they've located some of the wreckage from the flight they'll be able to narrow down the search area and locate the FDR.
Jimbuna
05-20-16, 07:33 AM
EgyptAir crash: Debris found from flight MS804
Debris from the missing EgyptAir flight has been found floating in the Mediterranean, Egyptian officials say.
Flight MS804 was en route from Paris to Cairo with 66 passengers and crew when it vanished early on Thursday.
Egypt's army spokesman said wreckage and passenger belongings were found 290km (180 miles) from Alexandria.
Greek Defence Minister Panos Kammenos said a body part, two seats and at least one suitcase had been found.
The items were found slightly to the south of the area where the plane disappeared from radars on Thursday, Mr Kammenos said.
The search is now focused on finding the plane's flight recorders, the Associated Press news agency reports.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-36339614
Aktungbby
05-20-16, 09:10 AM
With Von Due's summary in mind, I'm thinking massive tail/rudder failure a with AirAsia in 2014 and a rudder loss-combined with off-auto manual flying of the aircraft by the desperate pilot in extreme circumstances. Inasmuch as the 'dog is not barking'; no organization is taking 'credit' for a terrorist operation. That is not their usual modus operendi. http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2015/12/01/harsh-truths-about-crash-of-airasia-qz8501-come-out/ (http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2015/12/01/harsh-truths-about-crash-of-airasia-qz8501-come-out/) Also: March 2005: Air Transat Flight 961 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_961), an Airbus A310-308, en route from Cuba to Quebec City with nine crew and 261 passengers on board, experienced a structural failure in which the rudder detached in flight. The aircraft returned to Varadero, Cuba, where they made a safe landing. The crew made no unusual rudder inputs during the flight nor was the rudder being manipulated when it failed; there was no obvious fault in the rudder or yaw-damper system. Subsequent investigation determined that Airbus' inspection procedure for the composite rudder was inadequate; inspection procedures for composite structures on airliners were changed following this accident. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A310 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A310)
kraznyi_oktjabr
05-20-16, 09:31 AM
There was that Air France Flight from South America. Ice had rendered all tachometer devices useless, and the autopilot tried to counter with the data it received. When the jet lost altitude it gave positive elevator control and the nose went up until stalling.
The pilots did not know what was going on and were not able to switch from automatic to manual steering. A stall, drop and circling could be a hint for a similar technical failure.
Just saying.There are three major errors in your narrative:
1) When autopilot does not get sufficient data to fly safely it disconnects. That happened on Air France Flight 447.
2) Change between flight control laws is automated process not manual one. However ff person knows what he or she is doing it can be intentionally triggered by shutting down some of flight control computers.
3) At time of the accident plane's captain was off duty. First officer was in captain's seat with second officer in FO's. When troubles started first officer tried to correct situation. However second officer was applying constant nost up command in his side stick which caused the orignal stall situation and as it overrode all first officer's control inputs also ensured first officer could not correct situation. However I do not know if first officer's intended actions were appropriate or not.
Air France Flight 447 crash was due pilot error with mechanical malfunction (frozen pitot tubes) and user interface design (presentation of information and lack of feedback via side stick controllers) playing secondary role. Procedures exist for flying aircraft without accurate speed information but those were not followed.
(Air France 447 and Air Transat 236 were used as examples in user interface design course when speaking about user interface design in safety critical applications.)
Skybird
05-21-16, 04:58 AM
The probabilities seem to shift in favour of a cable fire or something like that as an explanation scenario. Board systems should have rang alarm over problems with the heating system on the toilets.
Von Due
05-21-16, 05:30 AM
According to BBC, there are unconfirmed (officially, that is) reports of smoke detection coming from, among other areas, the avionics bay. Fire is seriously bad news. Fire in the avionics bay ups the bad bit by a lot.
Pure speculations here: If there was a fire in the avionics bay, that could possibly explain why no mayday call was heard as monitoring systems, radio and transponders could be affected by this. A fire seems like a very likely candidate at this point but still, nothing is for sure yet. As for possible causes, that is a complete unknown at this point.
Jimbuna
05-21-16, 09:52 AM
Images of some of the debris:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-36349882
Von Due
06-01-16, 01:30 PM
Update
Black box signal detected
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36427053
Now as soon as they can recover it, theories can give way for answers.
The Egyptian investigation committee has said that the Cockpit Voice Recorder has been recovered from the sea.
https://twitter.com/AP/status/743430423192141824
Aktungbby
06-16-16, 09:00 AM
Inasmuch as the 'dog is not barking'; no organization is taking 'credit' for a terrorist operation. That is not their usual modus operendi. “received information from three independent channels”, that ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System) received the following messages from the aircraft: 00:26Z 3044 ANTI ICE R WINDOW
00:26Z 561200 R SLIDING WINDOW SENSOR
00:26Z 2600 SMOKE LAVATORY SMOKE
00:27Z 2600 AVIONICS SMOKE
00:28Z 561100 R FIXED WINDOW SENSOR
00:29Z 2200 AUTO FLT FCU 2 FAULT
00:29Z 2700 F/CTL SEC 3 FAULT
The timestamps refer to GMT and point to the alerts being received in the minutes before the flight dropped off radar screens.
Still no claim by a terrorist group "in contrast to a quick claim by Isis after a Russian plane exploded over Egypt in November.":hmmm: Avionics fire appears likeliest at present....
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.