Log in

View Full Version : NASA's encyclopedia


mapuc
07-16-15, 04:17 PM
NASA's encyclopedia have only two words-it looks like.

Under the atmosphere every unknown object = weather balloon-change when they find out what it was

In Space-every unknown object-space debris- Change when they find out what it was

So there you have it.

Use to see this NASA Unexplained- wonder how many times the word Space Debris are being used in a single program.

Markus

Oberon
07-16-15, 04:43 PM
I'm sensing a trend here...

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/frRcD7rlvUA/hqdefault.jpg

Torplexed
07-16-15, 08:03 PM
Weather balloons are known to exist and have testable properties. Space debris is known to exist and it has testable properties. Birds, Venus, swamp gas are known to exist and they have testable properties. Prior proof of existence and a set of testable properties makes these explanations automatically less crazy than pure conjecture about UFOs.

Space aliens are not yet known to exist. Since no one can tell us what properties they or their alleged vehicles have, it is not possible to test whether some mysterious object in the sky can be explained by them. No, weather balloons are not as exciting as space aliens, but real investigation is about what is provably likely, not about what you can wildly imagine.

Oberon
07-16-15, 08:07 PM
In other words "Observation, I can't see anything; Conclusion - Dinosaurs. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj5A0rKI0Ag)"

mapuc
07-16-15, 09:12 PM
Weather balloons are known to exist and have testable properties. Space debris is known to exist and it has testable properties. Birds, Venus, swamp gas are known to exist and they have testable properties. Prior proof of existence and a set of testable properties makes these explanations automatically less crazy than pure conjecture about UFOs.

Space aliens are not yet known to exist. Since no one can tell us what properties they or their alleged vehicles have, it is not possible to test whether some mysterious object in the sky can be explained by them. No, weather balloons are not as exciting as space aliens, but real investigation is about what is provably likely, not about what you can wildly imagine.

It is funny somehow. After have seen some episodes of NASA-unexplained files. The sentence "NASA say it's Space debris" was said many times throughout the series and here at Subsim I have seen on several occasion friends posting a picture with lots of different object and with only one word under each and one of them-Weather Balloon-that made me wonder

Have NASA only two words in their dictionary ?

forgot something- I wrote this in my first thread "In Space-every unknown object-space debris- Change when they find out what it was"

In one of the episode the speaker said-NASA say it's Space debris-later NASA found out that this was a part from SpaceShuttle Colombia.


Markus

Torplexed
07-16-15, 09:49 PM
me wonder

Have NASA only two words in their dictionary ?



Who knows? Maybe someday they'll add Lenticular Cloud. That won't stop people from seeing what they want to see.

http://heimhenge.com/skylights/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012-02-06-Q2.jpg
http://www.dolphinbayhotel.com/Images/Global/len7.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-poMEb6ZSilE/VKF7uGpcOGI/AAAAAAAAB2Q/E5cFLC0H4VM/s1600/hang%2Bcloud.jpg

Oberon
07-16-15, 09:59 PM
In one of the episode the speaker said-NASA say it's Space debris-later NASA found out that this was a part from SpaceShuttle Colombia.


Markus

Well...they weren't wrong...

Dowly
07-17-15, 01:29 AM
After have seen some episodes of NASA-unexplained files.
http://i.imgur.com/R5O3GaX.gif

Jimbuna
07-17-15, 05:34 AM
In other words "Observation, I can't see anything; Conclusion - Dinosaurs. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj5A0rKI0Ag)"

Rgr that.

Gargamel
07-17-15, 05:40 AM
I hate those "unexplained" shows. I watch them every now and then if they come on after something I have been watching, but even fox news looks at them and says "dang, that's a lot of spin".

If you just apply Occam's razor, then it's all very simple.

But why haven't we made contact yet? IE, the Fermi Paradox. There's a few scenarios:

1) They don't exist. Given the number of scenarios and environments that life has been found to exist, I find it highly unlikely. With the amount of exoplanet's estimated in our own galaxy, yet alone the universe, the odds are life exists in many locations. On a philosophical level, I don't like this, as it negates the need to even look.

2) They haven't evolved their technology to sufficient level. While this is possible, it's highly unlikely. Our technological boom has only taken a couple thousand years, depending on when you start counting. That's not even a blink of an eye cosmologically. Maybe we are the first to start exploring and studying space, but I doubt it, the odds are vastly against it.

3) Physics prevents direct contact over such long distances. This may be possible, with warp drive and other FTL travel and communication forever remaining in science fiction, never becoming fact. But again, we can't know unless we try, repeatedly.

4) They are refraining from contact. This doesn't make much sense to me. If they are operating to something similar to Star Trek's Prime Directive, then we are clearly at a point technologically where we are no longer protected by it. We are actively looking for life out there. If they are hiding for nefarious reasons, then it makes some sense, but not much. If they can travel that far, and not be easily detected, then we are obviously not a threat to them. Yes, the element of surprise is a thought, but even without it, what could we do in the mean time?

Schroeder
07-17-15, 06:11 AM
But why haven't we made contact yet?
Because of the Federation's Prime Directive. They won't make first contact until we're warp capable.:03:


:O:

Oberon
07-17-15, 06:18 AM
Because of the Federation's Prime Directive. They won't make first contact until we're warp capable.:03:


:O:

Probably just as well since in our current state this will probably be how it would go:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9TdvN07ZWI

Harvs
07-17-15, 06:29 AM
I believe there has to be something else out here, but why would you want to come here ? Get locked up and cut open by the shiny shoe'd mob,or get mugged and murdered and your spaceship stolen because you landed in the wrong neighbourhood.
Also our atmosphere could be like acid for them, just because we survive in it does not mean they or their ships can.
http://i.imgur.com/Z7ChaTM.jpg?1

Oberon
07-17-15, 06:50 AM
Well, considering how well our contacts with natives have gone over the centuries...perhaps it's just as well that no one seems to have found us yet... :doh:

And we men, the creatures who inhabit this earth, must be to them at least as alien and lowly as are the monkeys and lemurs to us. The intellectual side of man already admits that life is an incessant struggle for existence, and it would seem that this too is the belief of the minds upon Mars. Their world is far gone in its cooling and this world is still crowded with life, but crowded only with what they regard as inferior animals. To carry warfare sunward is, indeed, their only escape from the destruction that, generation after generation, creeps upon them.
And before we judge of them too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison and the dodo, but upon its inferior races. The Tasmanians, in spite of their human likeness, were entirely swept out of existence in a war of extermination waged by European immigrants, in the space of fifty years. Are we such apostles of mercy as to complain if the Martians warred in the same spirit?

Catfish
07-17-15, 06:57 AM
If "we" don't even have an "international" government speaking for the whole earth, or any space technology to speak about, what would any lifeform want here?

Rock'n roll? The French or US constitution? Bibles? Meet creationists? Talk to people like Cheney?

I guess any black hole would be more interesting than this place, and its inhabitants :03:

Betonov
07-17-15, 06:57 AM
Well, considering how well our contacts with natives have gone over the centuries...perhaps it's just as well that no one seems to have found us yet... :doh:

But those were different times. The days of colonisastion are over.
They'd probably just export democracy to us.

ikalugin
07-17-15, 07:02 AM
Maybe all civilisations ascend through technological singularity before they invent inter stellar travel.

Oberon
07-17-15, 07:36 AM
Maybe all civilisations ascend through technological singularity before they invent inter stellar travel.

Possible, although one could ponder if the singularity would enable us to explore the stars in a manner in which our current forms would not recognise, thus we could have been visited a dozen times over in a way in which we do not realise it.
Of course, we're just one tiny planet in a giant universe of them and we've only been broadcasting our presence for about 80 years, so our presence really only extends about 80 lightyears out into space, and the galaxy alone is 120,000 lightyears in diameter, so if anyone is passing by, they'd need to be passing pretty close to detect us and even then all they'd pick up would be the first episodes of the Lone Ranger and Watch with Mother. :hmmm:

u crank
07-17-15, 07:47 AM
Of course, we're just one tiny planet in a giant universe of them and we've only been broadcasting our presence for about 80 years, so our presence really only extends about 80 lightyears out into space, and the galaxy alone is 120,000 lightyears in diameter, so if anyone is passing by, they'd need to be passing pretty close to detect us and even then all they'd pick up would be the first episodes of the Lone Ranger and Watch with Mother. :hmmm:

We are also humans and as such we think too much of ourselves. Quite possible that highly evolved Alien life that has been traveling the cosmos for some time and has no interest in us. What a slap in the face. :O:

STEED
07-17-15, 12:26 PM
I hear NASA is No.1 in the world covering up UFO's and other strange business in outer space, I wonder if this is true. :hmmm:

And if it's true this is a job for..

http://sharetv.com/images/guide/350712.jpg

Pie man and cup cake kid

Nippelspanner
07-17-15, 06:50 PM
Because of the Federation's Prime Directive. They won't make first contact until we're warp capable.:03:


:O:
Schroeder won the thread.

Rhodes
07-17-15, 06:55 PM
Because of the Federation's Prime Directive. They won't make first contact until we're warp capable.:03:


:O:

Schroeder won the thread.

http://media.giphy.com/media/Ow59c0pwTPruU/giphy.gif

:up:

em2nought
07-18-15, 01:39 AM
Aliens don't exist because it might interfere with tithing. :03:

But it would support my theory that we are devolving instead of evolving. Where's my Nobel Prize? Obama gets one and all he does is stir the hate. lol