Sailor Steve and Tribesman

[Sailor Steve]

I have copied the last two posts from the 'Side Discussion' thread and created this new one at the request of members on that thread. I believe it is best to keep this public because the point of this argument is to convince others, not ourselves. On the other hand this makes it possible for anyone to just ignore it, and keeps it from tying up other threads.

[Sailor Steve]

Because of course I never post links and a certain person who gets provided specific details on the links has a really really bad memory:rotfl2:
Where's the link?

[Jeff-Groves]

Ain't there a rule about posting PM stuff?
:doh:
"Private Messages are private."

[Jeff-Groves]

I'm only messing with you on rules as you did with me.
:haha:
I don't have a horse in this race.
:)

[Sailor Steve]

Ain't there a rule about posting PM stuff?
:doh:
"Private Messages are private."
Not when you post something you yourself said.

[Jeff-Groves]

Not when you post something you yourself said.

What if the voice in my head said it?
:haha:

[vienna]

Whenever I try to listen to the voices in my head, they go straight to voicemail...


<O>

[u crank]

The voices in my head are always arguing. I try to stay out of it. :O:

[Jeff-Groves]

I think mine are complaining about rent.
:hmmm:

[Sailor Steve]

Pardon?

I thought I would just copy and paste this from a PM to a certain somebody 5 months ago.
That's fine, you have proven that you are a **** so often now that you are able to be classed as an habitual ****.
I have little time for ****s and absolutely no respect for they have to say.
Good day young man.

Yes, that is what you said. And you still haven't proven your claim against me. What you said then is nothing more than your opinion.

As for the other one, Yes, you did direct me to several books of much interest, and I praised you for it. That still is not the same as backing up your arguments publically with links, references and actual discussion. Can you show anywhere you've done that on the forum?

The problem still remains that you have a very long-standing habit of mocking other people's posts without providing any backup to your claims. Don't forget that this started when you yet again chose to make fun of another member rather than actually discuss the issue with him.

What I said here is still true:
As to the rest, all I've ever asked of you is to:

A) Stop making fun of people you disagree with, and

B) If you make a claim against anyone or their arguments, back it up. It's the claimant's job to prove what they say, with links and arguments. That's the accepted etiquette and everyone else follows it without too much trouble.

Do those two things and you'll never hear from me again.

[kranz]

I can assure you that the care police are on their way.

[Jeff-Groves]

Do those two things and you'll never hear from me again.
I'm laying money that this never happens.
The voice in my head that speaks Spanish agrees I think.
The one that's speaking Romanian? I have no idea what he's talking about.

[Sailor Steve]

:har:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/images/icons/icon1.gif Links
enough for a start?
You quoting yourself from a PM is not a link.

Was there links?:yep:
Did I provide them?:yep:
Is your claim that I never provide links baseless?:yep:
If there were links then you could link to them now. That's simple enough. Can you?

I'm betting I can show more than 100 instances in which you exhibit the behavior I accuse you of.

Not as easy as Nuremburg as they lack the cross references.
Was there links in the Speer topic?:yep:
Did I provide them?:nope:
Did I thank the person for the perfect link that provided all the information that was needed?
Did you need help finding the material in the link which was already provided but that you claimed wasn't there?:yep:
Did I tell you exactly which sections of the link contained all the information needed?:yep:
If this is true then you can show everybody that link now.

Was it a book I told you to read or was it the information already present in the posted link I told you to read?:hmmm:
If it was all in the link and no reference to a book was made does that mean your statement there is not true?:yep:
Can you demonstrate this now?

How many others can you show right now? The sole reason I get on you for this is because you have a long-standing pattern of not doing any of those. The most recent example is the attack by you that started all this. You didn't show links. You didn't discuss the topic. You didn't prove your claim that the person you attacked was wrong. You simply mocked your favorite target. This is wrong, and that is why I responded as I did.

Lest you forget, this discussion is at its core about your attack methods. If you're going to accuse someone of having bad arguments it's your job to dig into those arguments and show that they are wrong. Whatever your claims about me, the point is that you do this consistently. You want to argue that you did it properly once, good. That doesn't negate your years-long habit of doing this.

All you have to do is agree to my request in Post #14 and I'll agree to my statement at the end. You could make this end instantly.

[Pisces]

:har:I'm glad you are amusing yourself for your own benefit. I don't understand what's so funny. What I see in your earlier response is nothing more than an icon resembling a written page and a the word "Link" in bold larger text. Nothing actually resembling a link. That comes across to me like a refusal to deliver on the request and a response with the middle finger. Or as a suggestion to "Go reproduce yourself." If so, then Steve has a legitimate reason for starting this thread. Go work on your discussion skills. They are lacking! Very.

[Onkel Neal]

Just show these links, why dodge around it?

[Rockstar]

and young Narcissus fell in love with his own image reflected in a pool of water.

[Sailor Steve]

:har:


Which proves nothing for your claim :yep:
Shall I remind you in case you "forgot" that your claim is that I have never posted a link anywhere on this forum ever.
I wonder how many times I have told you to avoid absolutes?:hmmm:
No, my claim is that you consistently do this, and you do. As I've said three times now, you do those two things and you'll never hear from me again.

I also find it interesting that you think that if you can prove me wrong on just one point it will make your longstanding habit of mocking people and not backing up all of your claims somehow disappear. The simple answer would be to just start backing up your claims. Is that too simple? Or to complicated?

[Admiral Halsey]

Just show these links, why dodge around it?

I completely agree with this. If you have the links why aren't you showing us them?

[Oberon]

Don't wait for the translation!

[Sailor Steve]

Are these your words?


You never link, you never go quote anything from the links that would back up your claims, you never prove your case.
Sure, I said that once. Does that negate all the other times I've worded it differently? Now you're trying to derail the problem by cherry-picking and playing games. Do you deny that you consistently avoid posting links and backing up your arguments?

Is there any particular reason why you have changed your claim?
Like perhaps it being an obviously untrue claim.
I haven't changed it. Poor wording on my part in one instance, or even more, doesn't change the problem.

Remember words have meanings. never means never, it means not ever, it means not under any circumstances.
Again, you're attempting to use a mistake on my part to divert attention from your ongoing aversion to justifying your arguments. It doesn't change your attack methods or your continuing habit of ridiculing people rather than discuss your disagreements with them.

Have a link

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/never


I hate to break it to ya, but if you deal in absolutes one example is all that is needed to prove your claim false.
I have told you repeatedly that you should avoid absolutes.
Now you're doing nothing but playing games, and avoiding what started this all in the first place. You attacked and mocked another member, and rather than show where he was wrong you chose to post ROFL smilies instead.

Is that the same as me never hearing from you again about your repeated ridiculous claim that I delete peoples names from posts?
Does it carry the same weight, as in no weight at all?
Sure, I was wrong about that. It turned out to be an inability on your part to use the Reply With Quote button, something that still leaves people looking all over the thread to find you who you were quoting.

So you are saying you do know I post links:hmmm:
Not at all.

After all there are others which means that is one and you have accepted proof without a link.
As I said before, once is not a trend. You habitually do not back up your arguments and you consistently do not post links.

Would it be accurate to say you knew this to be true all along and your claim about me never posting links is a statement you knew to be false when you made it
Would it be accurate to say you also knew your accusation to be false when you have made it previously?
Not even close.

Would it be accurate to say you have twisted and turned and done everything within your power to avoid answering the original charge?

Would it be accurate to say this is habitual behavior on your part, avoiding the problem you created in the first place by trying to make it about someone else?

I chose one example there, not of course because it contains links I posted(as I never post links:03:), and not because I knew I discussed the posted links with a certain person.
I find it interesting that you aren't posting a link to that discussion either, just making another reference. All the rest is prevarication on your part. Did you go into detail and cite why the website's claims were wrong? Or did you just fall back into your usual mocking, which you have also demonstrated plenty of here?

Now to counter the claim lots of references were given, lots of quotes given, lots of links were given, official documents taken from the primary sources were presented.
Did you point out the exact pages and paragraphs that showed your case, or did you do your usual suggestion that he read the whole thing for himself?

More to the point, can you post a link here to that discussion?

It was then said that that person could link to 1000 sites...
I once had a similar discussion. When the person showed me some of his links I took the time to point out the fallacies in each claim made, and to show that most of the links he gave were exact copies of the others. Did you do the same, or did you just reply with more mockery?

[Sailor Steve]

Once?

So you used the same words then and didn't change them:nope:

Ah so not "once" then.

How many times have I suggested you avoid absolutes?
Is it each of the numerous occasions you have made the same false claim?
More games.

What started this is your false claim.
Yet again, what started this was your attack mocking Skybird. You still keep avoiding that.

No I made a post of sufficient length and detail to clarify all the points that were needed to refute the claim that the person had made, then chose to put in some ROFL, you chose to ignore the content of the bulk of the post and went off on one again.

Didn't stop you from returning to make exactly the same claim again did it.:yep:
Because open mockery of that type is not debate, but an attack. I chose to challenge you on it, because it is a long-running habit of yours.

Stop contradicting yourself.
You either know or you don't know.
Since you already said you know I do post links you look very very untruthful to claim again that you don't know that I post links.
Stop playing games. You know very well that you have a long record of not posting links and not discussing the topic with people you choose to mock. That is still the problem you have here and you would rather argue about it than change.

Never, ever, anywhere, always, all...Stick to your claim..
Or pay heed and avoid absolutes.
Plus I hate to remind you of course, but you said a single example would be sufficient for you to drop it
More games.

I am afraid your own words have already hung you there.
And continue to hang you.
Still more games, still avoiding the real problem.

Is that the one you said was an error on your part?:D
More twisting? More dodging?

Yes. As your PM showed I had already given the sections before I posted the links and funnily enough I in the topic I gave him the page numbers of the book he said he had:yeah:
Link please?

Yes I did indeed, many many times.:up:
Link please?

Oh I was very mocking, but then again it was a widely mocked claim right from the outset as it was so ridiculous.
And that kind of mockery is why you have recieved more infractions than anyone else on this forum. Yet you still continue to do it.

Yes, that was the point.
Well apart from the point that all of the links which supported his initial post were exact copies.
The point was that you addressed each of his points and discussed them? Or the point was that you made fun of him?
Can you show us a link so we can look at it ourselves?

[Mush Martin]

What if the voice in my head said it?
:haha:


LOL ........ (kill them all !!! ) :cool:

[vienna]

Is it a cause for worry if the voices in your head have subtitles?...


<O>

[Sailor Steve]

No, what started this is you once again repeating your falsehoods
I wouldn't have said anything if you hadn't done that.

But my dear fellow you said one link would be sufficient to shut you up:yep:
No, I said
A) Stop making fun of people you disagree with, and

B) If you make a claim against anyone or their arguments, back it up. It's the claimant's job to prove what they say, with links and arguments. That's the accepted etiquette and everyone else follows it without too much trouble.
That means every time. That means if you stop playing your usual game I will leave you alone. If not, every time you fail to debate properly you'll find me there, asking "Link please?"

Yes taking quotes from peoples links if very mocking, I should refrain from reading "evidence" people supply and then repeating it.
The saying I repeatedly quoted to another poster in GT - "It's not what you say, it's how you say it" - is applicable here. Your mockery does not consist of quoting people's words, but in ridiculing them. That is never helpful.

Now since a major proportion of those infractions have been delivered by someone who has proven themselves to be an habitual are they any measure.
There you go again, assuming deleting a word will keep you out of trouble. It's more of your same game.

Face it, you make a request, I fully comply with your request, you throw a fit and still hand out infractions when I point out that your specific request has been fully complied with.
Can you show where that happened?

It is why your requests now carry as much weight as your claims do.
Only in your own mind. My requests never carried any weight with you, nor have anyone else's. You seem to be convinced of your own rightness and will combat anyone who tries to get you to change.

Okay, here's the deal. I'm done with this game. Yes, I tried to get you to conform to proper etiquette in your dealings on this forum. If I went about it the wrong way, that's on me and I'm sorry. That said, if you continue your poor debate tactics I'll continue asking for proof. On the other hand if you continue attacking people as you do it's not me you have to worry about. Trying to straighten you out is no longer my problem. What comes next is on your head, not mine.

I'll leave this thread open for a few days so you can have the last word, and so anyone else who wants to can say their piece.

[Flamebatter90]

Here's a thought: If you are not sure if someone is telling the truth check it. It's not hard, takes a bit of googling

[STEED]

Look you two, kiss and make up or pistols at dawn you take your pick. :03:

[Skybird]

I have not read this thread, but still get a headache from imagining that it went for 3 pages. :doh:

http://www11.pic-upload.de/20.09.14/lo2qybilth.jpg (http://www.pic-upload.de/view-24668304/catbed1.jpg.html)

[DragonRider]

I have not read this thread, but still get a headache from imagining that it went for 3 pages. :doh:

http://www11.pic-upload.de/20.09.14/lo2qybilth.jpg (http://www.pic-upload.de/view-24668304/catbed1.jpg.html)

Ok here is the short version for you to catch up ......

post the links ....
you have a bad memory .....
post the links ......
you are a old person .......
post the links and prove you are right ......
you used the wrong phrase and you are silly and old ......
(Neal) just post the links .......
Oh look here is someone else to pick on

[kranz]

...

[Von Tonner]

The thing that not only amazes me but to be quite frank I find incredulous is that a poster, ANY poster, is allowed or given grace when calling another poster a liar without having the book thrown at them.

Not once. But repeats it even having had a warning apparently. And is then politely told to edit their post after said warning.

Where is that darn book:stare:

[Aktungbby]

Ok here is the short version for you to catch up ......

post the links ....
you have a bad memory .....
post the links ......
you are a old person .......
post the links and prove you are right ......
you used the wrong phrase and you are silly and old ......
(Neal) just post the links .......
Oh look here is someone else to pick on

NOMINATED FOR SYNOPSIS OF THE YEAR:woot:

[Jimbuna]

^ Appreciated.

[Onkel Neal]

Ok here is the short version for you to catch up ......

post the links ....
you have a bad memory .....
post the links ......
you are a old person .......
post the links and prove you are right ......
you used the wrong phrase and you are silly and old ......
(Neal) just post the links .......
Oh look here is someone else to pick on

A work of beauty :up:


Originally Posted by Skybird
I have not read this thread, but still get a headache from imagining that it went for 3 pages.

Count yourself lucky it was only a headache. :cool: I'm not sure what day it is anymore.

[August]

The thing that not only amazes me but to be quite frank I find incredulous is that a poster, ANY poster, is allowed or given grace when calling another poster a liar without having the book thrown at them.

Not once. But repeats it even having had a warning apparently. And is then politely told to edit their post after said warning.

Where is that darn book:stare:

This ^ One million times this! ^

[Aktungbby]

Count yourself lucky it was only a headache. :cool: I'm not sure what day it is anymore.

We now have side threads on our side threads ¿?!¡ NEW FAQ?: Only one side-thread per thread to avoid any appearance...thus maintaining the :subsim: "timbre of Verisimilitude!" ie: "a philosophical concept that distinguishes between the truth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth) and the falsity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsity) of assertions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_assertion) and hypotheses (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis)" and helpful links are mandatory. NO EXCEPTIONS:yep: :/\\!!

[Betonov]

Damnit Aktung, I'll need to splice the mainbrace to decipher this one

[Aktungbby]

Damnit Aktung, I'll need to splice the mainbrace to decipher this oneGLAD TO HELP!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbre (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbre) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verisimilitude (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verisimilitude) Stay thirsty my friend! Common usage when faced with princes of hokum, pernicious prevaricators, or outright promulgators of tall tales: "That lacks the 'ring(timbre) of verisimilitude Sir!" a link on that'un.." all the while keeping a grip on your pistol as you've just called him a liar !:03:

[Onkel Neal]

We now have side threads on our side threads

:haha: It's like Inception....

The thing that not only amazes me but to be quite frank I find incredulous is that a poster, ANY poster, is allowed or given grace when calling another poster a liar without having the book thrown at them.

Not once. But repeats it even having had a warning apparently. And is then politely told to edit their post after said warning.

Where is that darn book:stare:

Well, I had my arm cocked but thought, why not one more warning...:-? One last warning.

[nikimcbee]

Just found this...
http://treasure.diylol.com/uploads/post/image/223514/resized_business-cat-meme-generator-oh-hi-just-thought-i-d-let-you-know-steve-is-coming-round-tonight-i-ve-dressed-up-for-the-occasion-ac4d36.jpg

[mapuc]

Sometimes it's better to have peace, than having right


Markus

[vienna]

So you are posting in ignorance.


Well, it has never deterred me from posting...


<O>

[Rockstar]

Sailor Steve and for all other Subsim Moderators too. It's a dirty job but someone's gotta do it :rotfl2:

http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/1e/c8/5d/1ec85d9cae07c316f34d515194859e8f.jpg

[d@rk51d3]

Is it a cause for worry if the voices in your head have subtitles?...


<O>
They're not subtitles.

They're links. :D

[mapuc]

They're not subtitles.

They're links. :D

Or your alter ego open an acount here on Subsim and you and your alter ego start to a discussion.

Markus

[August]

Or your alter ego open an acount here on Subsim and you and your alter ego start to have an discussion with you self.

Markus

Been done.

[Rockstar]

Link to the links

http://www.turkishgolfadvisor.net/wp-content/gallery/lykia-links-golf-course/lykia-links-golf-course-5.jpg

[Oberon]

http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100527144401/zelda/images/c/c4/The_Legend_of_Zelda_-_A_Link_to_the_Past_%28Europe%29.png

[Oberon]

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lb3mo3jjX81qdkk6i.jpg

[STEED]

Can the rest of us place bets who will win? :)

[MGR1]

links, links, links.

Why go left, left, left?:doh::03:

Mike.:O:

[Oberon]

Why go left, left, left?:doh::03:

Mike.:O:

Because Communism is ruining America!

http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh288/krispos42/Morans/race_mixing_is_communism.jpg

[August]

Because Communism is ruining America!



Betcha every one of those people had a Democratic party card in their wallets... :yep:

[Buddahaid]

Betcha every one of those people had a Democratic party card in their wallets... :yep:

Link please. :O:

[mapuc]

Someone mentioned Bets

On who can I place a bet and what is the odds and most important to whom should I send the money to ?

Markus

[u crank]

Link please. :O:

:har:

Wish I had said that.

[Armistead]

Someone mentioned Bets

On who can I place a bet and what is the odds and most important to whom should I send the money to ?

Markus

You can send it to me..

[Webster]

Someone mentioned Bets

On who can I place a bet and what is the odds and most important to whom should I send the money to ?

Markus

its a sure bet that a link will never be provided because non exists :shucks:

[Skybird]

its a sure bet that a link will never be provided because non exists :shucks:
Non exists?

Since Heidegger we know that "nothing" does not exist. "Nothing" is inseparably linked to "being", and only in nothingness existence gets revealed. Therefore it is impossible that a link does not exist.

Quoted by Professor Boerne. :haha:

What have we learned from this? Don't bet.

[Dowly]

http://i.imgur.com/75fj1S5.jpg

:hmph:

[Tchocky]

You back*, Dowly?

* = not even sure if you've been gone, just feels that way :)

[Dowly]

Maybe I am just a construct of your imagination.

You crazy person, you. :huh:

[Sailor Steve]

You back*, Dowly?

* = not even sure if you've been gone, just feels that way :)
He's been here all along. :yep:

[Tchocky]

For some reason I thought you'd gone. Then again I wasn't on the boards for months, so there's a teeny tiny possibility I was projecting :D

[Jimbuna]

He's been here all along. :yep:

Since end of Feb.

[Oberon]

Maybe I am just a construct of your imagination.

You crazy person, you. :huh:

Stop batting flames. :O:

[Jimbuna]

Stop batting flames. :O:

I'll not give that the honour of a facepalm even....not once, ninety or any other number you care to think up.

[Rockstar]

So Dowly, how did the smoking cessation program work out?

link: -----> http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=151521

[Dowly]

So Dowly, how did the smoking cessation program work out?

link: -----> http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=151521

I quit quitting.

[Nippelspanner]

This thread makes Nippelspanner sad.

[kranz]

For some reason I thought you'd gone. Then again I wasn't on the boards for months, so there's a teeny tiny possibility I was projecting :D
he was gone but he realized that life without subsim is just an imitation.

This is a common phenomenon among those who say: 'I'll never be back'
You try to log off to real life but then you realize there is no real life - it's only afk.

[Oberon]

I'll not give that the honour of a facepalm even....not once, ninety or any other number you care to think up.

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130505202237/vampirediaries/images/a/ad/Bow.gif

[Jimbuna]

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130505202237/vampirediaries/images/a/ad/Bow.gif

Oh come on, you can do better than that....the genie is now out of the bottle and in the public domain :)

I had thought about messaging you awhile back but it honestly slipped my mind :03:

http://s25.postimg.org/mjfkdkw6j/th_genie9hy.gif (http://postimage.org/)

[les green01]

pop a bag of popcorn opens a bottle of becks don't know what better to watch the longest day or this thread

[Dowly]

I would go with The Longest Day.

[STEED]

pop a bag of popcorn opens a bottle of becks don't know what better to watch the longest day or this thread

Depends if they jump into bed or club each other to death. :hmmm:

I suggest a tea drinking competition to see who can drink the most before heading to the bog for a whiz. :03:

[les green01]

Guess Neal can make a ring in corner number one Sailor Steve wearing the US Navy trunks Corner number two Tribesman wearing emerald Green Trunks at the sound of the bell come out in the middle shakes hand sit at table grab your cokes or drink of choice and go at it first person that leaves the ring for any reason loses ever hour a bathroom break Neal sales tickets,drinks,food that way he can use the profits to help pay subsim expense for awhile

[Oberon]

I think if Neals organising it, it'll be Dr Peppers all round. :03:

[CaptainHaplo]

Sadly, the only thing that surprises me in this whole thread is the fact that Neal indicated that tribesman would get "one final warning". As much as he has intentionally acted out, I really didn't think it would ever get there. In truth, part of me doubts even now he will get a ban hammer the next time he decides to act like a troll.

Time will tell, because if there is one bet we can all safely put money on - its that he can't help but troll.

[Oberon]

The definition of trolling varies from person to person to be fair. Certainly Tribesman is not the only person who is still posting on this forum who has come to heavy blows with a serving moderator.... :hmmm:

[CaptainHaplo]

The definition of trolling varies from person to person to be fair. Certainly Tribesman is not the only person who is still posting on this forum who has come to heavy blows with a serving moderator.... :hmmm:

Oh I agree there.
The difference is that there can be an honest disagreement of opinion and a discussion/debate concerning those differences. Or there can be a choice to disagree with personal mockery while providing nothing more than "because I said so" for the disagreement.

[Oberon]

Oh I agree there.
The difference is that there can be an honest disagreement of opinion and a discussion/debate concerning those differences. Or there can be a choice to disagree with personal mockery while providing nothing more than "because I said so" for the disagreement.


True, but I think that words like:


I'm just sick of his sanctimonious crap.


or


I say you should resign as a moderator and become a regular member if you're going to be a partisan hack.


or

Cry me a river fluffy. You treat other people like dirt that don't agree with you, so stuff it, hypocrite.

or


I find you both biased and judgmental. You really are a terrible choice as moderator. I hope that is just as clear to you.


are not particularly helpful in a discussion.

[Wolferz]

Duking it out in an aisle at Toys-R-Us.:O:

[Aktungbby]

That's naughty, pulling up quotes from people to make your point:03:

Especially when using moderator thusly; everyone will think I've got two accounts and I'll be brigged again! :D :O:

[Armistead]

Especially when using moderator thusly; everyone will think I've got two accounts and I'll be brigged again! :D :O:

You should be brigged for your maddening use of the English language......

[Admiral Halsey]

You know this whole thing could've been avoided if Tribesman just posted the links. How hard is that for him to do anyways?

[Armistead]

You know this whole thing could've been avoided if Tribesman just posted the links. How hard is that for him to do anyways?

He's not in it for proper debate, he's in it for distance and irritation. Why I hardly bother with him, if at all....

[Buddahaid]

He's not in it for proper debate, he's in it for distance and irritation. Why I hardly bother with him, if at all....

He does have that nasty habit of cutting through hyperbole and ruining perfectly good arguments. :shifty:

[Wolferz]

You know this whole thing could've been avoided if Tribesman just posted the links. How hard is that for him to do anyways?

He needs an internet connection to find the links.

[Oberon]

Hey did I write those?
Go on give us a link Oberon.

That's naughty, pulling up quotes from people to make your point:03:

Links you say?

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203145&page=3

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2028288&page=15

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1933013&post1933013

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1933044&post1933044

In fact, just looking in the following threads will give you an idea about how Tribesman is not the only person who has gone to town on moderators...or indeed, not the only person to go to town on Steve:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203106&page=17

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1839279&post1839279

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203161

Which I guess brings us back to the old saying:

http://38.media.tumblr.com/7a0688e9e617b6c2e6854550b744624b/tumblr_mh7tcuYxz41rlwiamo1_500.jpg

[Wolferz]

Links you say?

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203145&page=3

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2028288&page=15

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1933013&post1933013

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1933044&post1933044

In fact, just looking in the following threads will give you an idea about how Tribesman is not the only person who has gone to town on moderators...or indeed, not the only person to go to town on Steve:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203106&page=17

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=1839279&post1839279

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=203161

Which I guess brings us back to the old saying:

http://38.media.tumblr.com/7a0688e9e617b6c2e6854550b744624b/tumblr_mh7tcuYxz41rlwiamo1_500.jpg

They should also dress in the basement. Especially the fat and ugly ones.:arrgh!:

[Oberon]

They should also dress in the basement. Especially the fat and ugly ones.:arrgh!:

You stay out of my basement...I've only just cleaned up after the last person poked their head in there... :O:

[STEED]

http://38.media.tumblr.com/7a0688e9e617b6c2e6854550b744624b/tumblr_mh7tcuYxz41rlwiamo1_500.jpg

That's why they have guard dogs to rip there arms off.

[Armistead]

Exibitionist like glass houses.....:D

Reminds me of the time my wife and I were at the beach and...oh, nevermind....

[DragonRider]

Exibitionist like glass houses.....:D

Reminds me of the time my wife and I were at the beach and...oh, nevermind....

:timeout: OMG "No wait" do you have a link for that :o :har:

[Jimbuna]

:timeout: OMG "No wait" do you have a link for that :o :har:

Allow me :)

http://s22.postimg.org/4r94lg4cx/image.jpg (http://postimage.org/)

[Armistead]

:timeout: OMG "No wait" do you have a link for that :o :har:

thankfully no videos ever were leaked....to my knowledge....

[Buddahaid]

Your in trouble now.......

:huh:...:o..........:O:


:woot:

[Jimbuna]

I saw what he did....13 point infraction and six months in the brig :know:

[Armistead]

I saw what he did....13 point infraction and six months in the brig :know:

What did he do?

[Jimbuna]

What did he do?

And you thought no videos were released :har: :oops: