Log in

View Full Version : Manual Targeting Failure


Zosimus
06-18-14, 12:44 PM
So I've started playing with 100 percent realism (under a new name so I can preserve my old games, if I choose). I was out for a cruise in my fine U-boat when night fell and, as usual, I went underwater. I figure I might be able to find things visually by day but at night hydrophone is better.

A few hours into my cruise I was rewarded with a contact: Merchant, closing, long range, slow. A look at the map showed me that it was somewhere to my SSE and a quick measurement with the protractor soon had me heading 167º at 2 knots. A couple of minutes later another contact showed the ship heading west and so I set course 225º, zoomed in, and dropped a mark on the contact location. Another minute later and I had the apparent ship course of 75 to port, which I worked out to be 285 and a quick line showed its apparent course. I set course for 270º and surfaced the boat.

Once I woke the watchman up and got him on lookout I calculated a line that would intersect and set course at 10 knots. About 5 minutes later I had success: Ship spotted. So I zoomed in, and dropped a mark on its location and started the stopwatch. 3:15 later I placed another mark and measured: 0.7 heading 70º to port. A few minutes later I rechecked and found that the heading was closer to 69º and I drew a line across my map showing the merchant's course.

As I was already slightly ahead I picked some place up yonder and drew a perpendicular line and a circle with a radius of 0.6 and sent the ship gunning there at 14 knots. Along the way I thought better of that and sent the ship a little to the NE of that location with three waypoints leading me to my final location: The final two on the line of approach. As I drew close to my destination I slowed to 1 knot and maneuvered my way in quite slowly.

Despite my best efforts, I found that I drifted nearly 100m in towards the anticipated target, so I set the range at 500m, speed 7 knots, and raised the observation periscope a bit. The bearing was already at 0º and I set AOB 90º starboard and called for periscope depth. It takes awhile to get under when you are at all stop.

It was no more than a minute underwater and I got hydrophone contact and a line showing the merchant on the anticipated course. I raised the observation periscope and tried to find the ship, but I noticed the gyroangle wasn't updating. Worried, I returned the scope to 0º, hit F6 and rechecked my settings. Once done, I switched off of manual settings and went back to the observation periscope. At that point when I moved the scope I saw the gyroangle updating. Perfect!

All stop and waiting for the merchant to come into range everything seemed perfect. I lowered the observation scope and switched to the attack scope. I clearly saw the English flag and so I felt confident and when the gyroangle said 355 I flooded tube 1. At gyroangle 000 I clicked fire and hit F6. I watched proudly as my torpedo streamed out over the distance toward the target. It seemed perfect, at first, but the torpedo passed astern of the merchant.

I know you weren't there to see me, but any ideas what I might have done wrong?

Pisces
06-18-14, 05:30 PM
Well, the 3 minute 15 second plot is good for getting a quick fix on his speed. But it isn't that accurate. It's better to take an average over a few intervals. 4 intervals are 13 minutes. Which is just long enough what the stopwatch can show. 12 minutes on the small handle, and another lap of the big one. And you get the speed known to a quarter of a knot. Much better the TDC won't take anyway.

But if the target really was at 500 meters in front of you then it should have hit anyway. 1 knot of speed difference alone cannot make that much of a miss at this distance.

The target can speed up if it does see the bubble wake of the type 1 torpedo. So it may have tried to dodge it successfully. Remember the near Tramp Steamer in the torpedo academy mission? How sure were you of your stealth?

Other than that I can only imagine the Torpedo speed setting bug messing up the TDC when switching between tubes with a type 1 and type 2 with different speed settings. In the future you can check this manually if it is correct with a rule of thumb (assuming near 90 AOB):

Lead angle= 60 * Target speed / Torpedo speed

maillemaker
06-18-14, 06:23 PM
It was no more than a minute underwater and I got hydrophone contact and a line showing the merchant on the anticipated course. I raised the observation periscope and tried to find the ship, but I noticed the gyroangle wasn't updating.

Yup, forgetting to turn the TDC on and off can ruin an attack, for sure.

3:15 will give you the exact speed [i]if you are 100% certain of the ship's position at the start and stop of the time.

If you are 100% realism without map updates, then your map solution may not be 100% certain.

I try to shoot at less than 1000 meters, and I still miss, too. It all comes down to knowing their speed accurately.

Steve

Zosimus
06-18-14, 08:38 PM
I'm still not sure why I missed, but I've had better success now that I always set the torpedo depth to 2 meters rather than 5.

Zosimus
06-19-14, 08:50 AM
Yeah I had that happen once, but I figured it out long before I took the shot. The gyroangle was showing zero on the wrong side of the 0º bearing.

maillemaker
06-19-14, 09:42 AM
Yup, that's happened to me before, too.

Also I have tried down-the-throat shots at pursuing destroyers only to realize after firing that I forgot to dial the target speed back down to zero...

Steve

Zosimus
06-19-14, 10:43 AM
I've gone pro! I've recently scored three perfect hits on merchants from as far away as 2300m. It's not nearly as hard as I'd feared. The only problem is they don't go down on the first torpedo. :down: With winds at 13m/s I can't man the deck gun. How long should I wait to be certain the merchant isn't going to sink? An hour? Two?

Tips:

Always measure speed for at least 6:30, not 3:15.
Always determine your gyroangle before firing (11-12º for 6 knot ships).
Measure distance to target down the gyroangle bearing, not the perpendicular bearing.
Don't just call all stop when you are at your desired range: Call back slow until the speed drops to 0 then call all stop.
Always double check your torpedo depth setting.
Always double check that you are on the desired perpendicular heading.

maillemaker
06-19-14, 12:31 PM
I pretty much have resigned myself to two fish per target. It's the only way to be reasonably sure the ship is going to sink in GWX.

It always annoys me when the ship goes up like the Fourth of July on the first hit and then the second fish is already on the way. :)

Steve

Zosimus
06-19-14, 12:38 PM
New hit at 2900m (firing angle, not actual torpedo angle). Target has dropped from 8.5 knots to "slow" and still zigzagging. I'm 5,000 meters ahead on his previous course at 4 knots waiting to see what happens. The good news is the weather has changed. The bad news is it's no longer 13 m/s wind rather 15 m/s. :/\\!!

Fourfifties
06-19-14, 02:22 PM
I pretty much have resigned myself to two fish per target. It's the only way to be reasonably sure the ship is going to sink in GWX.

It always annoys me when the ship goes up like the Fourth of July on the first hit and then the second fish is already on the way. :)

Steve

In my experience with GWX most ships will go down with a single bow shot. Medium Cargoes and Granville-Style Freighters go down reliably to a single topedo ahead of the first mast. It may take an hour or two of game time, but as long as you set the depth of the torpedo to well below the waterline their whole bow will flood eventually. Even some large merchants will sink to single torpedo in the bow. Though once you get outside of the 4000-5000 ton range two torpedoes is advisable.

maillemaker
06-19-14, 03:15 PM
I agree bow shots tend to be effective - it's like they drive themselves into the sea. :)

Steve

Zosimus
06-19-14, 07:31 PM
Well, I had a great outing until a destroyer blew up my periscope and hydrophone. I called it quits after that and sailed for home. The highlight was spending 20 minutes calculating the torpedo solution for a merchant vessel only to find out that it was a schooner. Fortunately the wind was favorable and I surfaced and sunk it with 5 shots.

banryu79
06-20-14, 04:40 AM
Tips:
...
Measure distance to target down the gyroangle bearing, not the perpendicular bearing.

If I position my sub with reaspect to tgt track for a straight 90° attack and I set up the TDC accordingly, with torp speed of 40 kts and target speed of 8 kts, I should read a 000° gyro angle when my periscope bearing is pointing at +/- 12° (firing bearing) from 000° bearing.
So are you saying that the range to input in the TDC is not the length of the perp line that connects my sub to tgt track? But is the length of the line that connects my sub with the tgt itself when it is crossing the "firing bearing"?

If so this is against everything I had red on many, many tutorials out there... :06:


How long should I wait to be certain the merchant isn't going to sink? An hour? Two?

According to the "Submarine Commander Handbook" (http://www.hnsa.org/doc/uboat/index.htm#par391) under Section IX "Use (Expenditure) of Torpedoes" -- If, in remote sea areas, an early arrival of enemy defence forces is not to be anticipated, the final shot should not be precipitated. Many ships sink only after 2 to 3 hours. -- :)

banryu79
06-20-14, 05:49 AM
You could easily do the do it the other way, say if ship is coming at you and is at shall we say 45 degrees on periscope. Then yes you input the range to the ship at 45 degrees. Then when you move the scope, the range will come down as it get closer as the TDC updates itself.


By doing it a 0 degrees, you predicting where the target will be when at 000 degrees, straight firing. Secret is , set up torp speed first. Angle on bow, bearing, expected range at 0 degrees 2nd. Then after dial in the speed. This will extend the range, but when you move the scope to 012, then range will then come down to range you predicted.
Well mate, perephs I'm drunk or a bit slow with my head today but I really can't remember having seen a single time the TDC range value updating itself when moving the scope; the only thing that change is the gyro angle value.
Maybe I didn't understand what you had said or I am missing something very obvious, sorry (btw, in game I only use manual targeting and I have not a problem to set up correctly my shots, 90° straigth ones or at different AOB, I sometimes use 110° AoB, and I'm very good at getting hits, even two hits at about 3500 meters... so :dead:)

banryu79
06-20-14, 07:28 AM
-- Wall of text --

Hey mate, you are absolutley right! :salute:
I'm a little slow today, as I said, wtf, lol :haha:

Zosimus
06-20-14, 07:55 AM
Well, the way I understand it is this: If you have all the data correctly input into the computer for the range, bearing, AOB, and speed of the target as it truly is at the moment of firing then the torpedo will unerringly cross the ship at the correct point; provided, of course, that the ship does not change course or speed. Obviously you want to hit the ship at or as close as possible to broadside because it seems that the more oblique the angle of intersection is, the more likely the torpedo is to bounce off the ship without exploding.

In my experience, the TDC range does not update automatically. I have only seen the AOB update automatically and this only on change in bearing.

I know that people say that in 90º AOB shots the range doesn't matter. I have tested it by changing the range on the F6 screen and I agree that if the ship is at 0º bearing and 90º AOB then the range will not matter. However, at other angles, when dialing the range I have seen what appears to be a change in the angle of launch. Obviously it's hard to measure with a protractor on the F6 screen as the drawing tools are unavailable.

Additionally, there are other good reasons for having the range correctly entered. If you put in the wrong range you will see your stopwatch tick past the red mark with no explosion, think you've missed, and fire another eel at the ship only to find the torpedo intersecting the ship seconds later. The second shot is invariably wasted.

Additionally it may be impossible for you to fire at the perfect 000 gyroangle, especially in choppy water, as you may temporarily lose sight of the target and have to wait a second or two to reacquire it or you may have to delay precious seconds to verify the flag. Is it just me or does the smokestack often obscure the flag at the precise moment you desperately need to see it?

In my experience measuring the range down the firing line is only important when making very long shots or when the target is traveling at a high speed. Normally my crude instruments cannot tell the difference between the range at intersection or at firing as they usually read something like 0.4 rather than 0.39. They can, however, tell me the difference between 4.0 and 3.9. My scientific calculator tells me that at a 12º lead the range will be 2.185% less at the moment of impact. My precious TDC does not permit me to enter the range with that degree of precision, but I try to give it the very highest qualify information possible.

vanjast
06-21-14, 02:16 AM
Have a look at this..

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=213971

There's an adjustment error in the last stage, but up to stage 5 you should get within +-1 knot of ship speed and low AOBs.

At AOBs at 45-90 you should get within +-0.5 Knots.

I'm still busy with the last correction stage, but have parties to attend to :arrgh!:
(aaahhhh ...the life of the rich and famous :haha: )

P_Funk
06-21-14, 06:05 AM
As stated above, the range updating, is not shown anywhere, but is updating in the background.

I challenge you to show, using maths only, that you can hit a non standard 90% perpendicular vessel. At 90 AOB, without having a range. I'm not talking a AOB of 89 or 91, but something like 110 degrees. It must update, you could not hit without getting updated calculation. Just because it does not show anywhere does not mean it its not updating.
I haven't played much in a while but this feels incorrect to me. The only thing the TDC really needs in order to hit something is a lead angle, all the variables you feed it serve this end only. Range just never figured as that important in my experience, not insofar as actually getting a valid solution from the TDC at the point of firing.

Perfect example though is the OLC Gui tutorial video. When OLC goes to set up an attack he reads a range of 2600m to the target but mistakenly inputs 1600m. When he fires the torpedo it hits the target anyway (dud from high angle impact but oh well hit is a hit).

That attack actually perfectly meets your criteria too. AOB 55 STB, 7 Knots, with an error in range of around 1000m for a shot above 2000m. I think that says it all.

Pisces
06-21-14, 07:58 AM
...
This is incorrect, you hit a non 90 shot. You need bearing, speed and range, so that the torp will go off at the correct angle to intercept the target. The AOB is an additional part of the maths, to ensure you hit it square on the side. You will see that the torp will go off at and angle and sweep around after firing to hit the side.

...

I challenge you to show, using maths only, that you can hit a non standard 90% perpendicular vessel. At 90 AOB, without having a range. I'm not talking a AOB of 89 or 91, but something like 110 degrees. It must update, you could not hit without getting updated calculation. Just because it does not show anywhere does not mean it its not updating.I'm afraid you are incorrect here. Range does not enter the equation for calculating the lead angle (with reference to periscope bearing) to get the torpedo to a moving target. It only determines how long the torpedo takes to get there. AOB, target speed and torpedo speed is sufficient to determine the angle between the periscope bearing and the gyro-angle. Only when the torpedoes have to make a turn after leaving the tube (not 0 gyro angle) does the range get important to correct for a parallax angle offset( the straight run out of the tube and subsequent turn make it come from a slightly different direction) But going straight out of the tube range is no factor in getting it to hit.

The equation for the lead angle of the torpedo towards a moving target can be created from a triangle composed of the target speed, torpedo speed and the AOB. The 'range'-edge of the triangle can be calculated entirely from the other values with trigonometry. And it is a speed also. Again, we rely on the assumption that the gyro angle is 0. (torpedoes do not turn and curve and the uboat/sub is oriented correctly previously) No matter the initial range to the target, the shape of the triangle stays the same. So all angles inside it do also.

According to the "Law of Sines" (wiki) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_sines) the ratio of opposing sides to the sine of angle is constant for all corners. So:

torpedo speed/sin (AOB) = target speed/sin(lead angle) { = torpedo 'closure rate to target'/ sin(impact angle) }

If you re-arrange it you get:

sin(lead angle) = sin(AOB)* target speed/torpedo speed

And by using the inverse sine function you get the lead angle of course.

As stated above, the range updating, is not shown anywhere, but is updating in the background. The watch or weapon officer assistance might calculate and show an updating range on the notepad, but that is more likely due to the guy cheating with his divine knowledge of the targets coordinates. Not a sign of TDC functionality. Also, (un)locking the periscope from the target and manuall moving it should (dis)prove the range-updating by the TDC based on target bearing. I've never noticed this. And if he is disabled then this info is not available to the manual operator anyway. Aside from correcting the torpedo turn for this off-bow aiming, the range dial on the F6 page is only used for calculating the impact time.

[EDIT]As for the notepad procedure itself, using this method range is an integral part in this calculation of the target speed. Range that you measured with the stadimeter determines the size of the triangle, and thus speed. AOB that you sighted and entered determines the shape or slenderness of the aiming triangle. The periscope bearing drift while locked on the target, determines how much the target moved in a certain time frame. And this is the angle that closes the aiming triangle. So if you consider it using this method as Ubisoft suggested, then yes range is quite important to get the result. But in reality, only target speed and AOB is important to get the torpedo moving in the right direction.


Also, the perpendicular 90 degree hitting of the target hull is NOT sacred! You can orient your sub any way you like against the target course. It's just wise to do it perpendicular as his broadside gives the most margin against incorrect measurements. Even if your bow is pointed 45 degrees to the target course (or whatever is your fancy) can you get a perfect torpedo-target-encounter! In this case you'll be more successful explosion-wise with magnetic torpedoes passing under the target, rather than impact torpedoes on the hull as they would bounce off. But for the purpose of aiming alone, torpedo steel will meet hull steel no matter what. (assuming no errors made , and no detection in the process)

Make sure the bow is pointed 45 (or 135) degrees to the target course. Set your periscope to 0, flip the update switch on the TDC page to 0, set AOB to 45 (or 135 depending on moving away or closing) in the direction to where the target moves to in the view, and set up target speed. Flip the update switch back to 1. Then swing the periscope until the gyro angle is 0. You are all set (after opening the tube doors. ;) Torpedo will move straight ahead out of the tube to meet the target under a 45 degree angle.

Whatever range angle you enter, the torpedo and TDC won't care. The stopwatch time indicator might show a false impact time. But the torpedo will be on target anyway.

Zosimus
06-21-14, 11:58 AM
I undertook a simple experiment to determine whether the range was important. This was the procedure I followed:

First, I set my TDC speed to zero and turned the bearing until the gyroangle read 000. This is the "true zero" bearing, which on my screen is a hair to the right of the 0º on the slightly-raised observation scope.

Next I set the range for 300 (the minimum), speed 10 knots, AOB 90º Port (I'm currently following a ship and 90º port will be the final AOB at the moment of impact [fingers crossed]). At that point I set the TDC, returned to the observation scope, and turned the scope until the gyroangle read zero.

Next I returned to the TDC, and changed the range to 50,000m. I reset the TDC and returned to the observation scope. The gyroangle now reads 359.

Accordingly I conclude, as a practical matter independent of math concerns, that range can matter in the game I am playing but that such variance will be slight and will not matter for most shots.

Andrewsdad
06-22-14, 02:32 PM
Just two anecdotes regarding two topics raised here.

Target sighted at high stbd angle on bow so I made a end-around approach. This allowed me to make a lot of measurements, including a good 10 minute apart measurement and using the nomograph, determined the tgt speed at 9.5 knots.

It was night and weather was 15 m/s wind with moderate visibility the periscope was difficult to use....

However I got set up for a 90 degree shot with a torpedo run of 700 meters.

Alas... periscope observation and mast-height measurement showed that the target would get pretty close to the arming distance so I needed to shoot early so the torp would arm for sure. So I switched to magnetic exploder and fired with a gyro angle of 320 degrees.

I used the external camera to watch the shot... The torp made the big turn and hit the target right on the bow. Almost a miss ahead !!! I figure that my failure to update the range to target at time of firing was why I almost missed !!! She sank in 10 minutes.


As to the time it takes a target to sink... I hit a tanker straggling from a convoy. Got her just aft the bridge structure. Again the wind/sea were running high. After two hours I put another into her, unfortunately it struck in almost the same place. No more internal torps and couldnt reload externals in the bad weather so I hung around waiting for her to sink or the weather to improve so I could use the deck gun.

"She's going down!" was reported 37 hours later !!!!!! At that point I departed the scene never seeing it actually sink.

One more just for fun.... Another straggler struggling in the heavy seas. End around approach. Target making 3.5 knots, Ideal setup. Observing thru the attack scope, tube #3 open, 15 more degrees to go when..... The crew starts to cheer and she sinks !!!!! A victim of King Neptune seconds before I was to fire !!!! :wah:

Ach du Lieber !!!!

AD

maillemaker
06-23-14, 11:21 AM
The short answer is, if you shoot with a 000 gyro angle, range to target does not matter. All that matters is target speed and AOB.

However, a 90 degree AOB attack makes the chance of hit and good impact more likely.

Steve

Pisces
06-23-14, 03:22 PM
The short answer is, ...I don't care a bout TL/DR reponses. :O:

vanjast
06-26-14, 04:30 AM
I figure that my failure to update the range to target at time of firing was why I almost missed !!!
AD

You are correct... the TDC range setting is important for Close and Far range targets.
At medium ranges (approx 1500 - 3000m) you can get away with incorrect range settings... but it still effects accuracy if you are looking at 'sniping'.

:)

Pisces
06-26-14, 05:13 AM
With a gyro angle of 320, and the uboat perpendicular to the target track, it's apparent length does seem 25 percent shorter than if it got hit at gyro angle 0. So yeah, significant reduction in margin of error.The range dial could have made a difference. As the correction it makes is larger at short range compared to long range.

Andrewsdad
06-29-14, 09:21 PM
I do believe it is a good habit for Kaleuns to always input range data into the firing solution even if it is a 90 degree shot.
Having a firing routine on a checklist will go a long way toward not missing when the action gets going !!!

Salute !!
AD