Log in

View Full Version : Pearl Harbor thought.


Admiral Halsey
05-27-14, 04:21 PM
Ok I was originally going to put this in my Alternate History thread but I want more responses then I normally get for this post. Ok so here it goes. In this scenario FDR, Kimmel and Short and MacArthur(Plus anyone else who'd need to know) know Japan is going to attack Pearl and the Philippines a few months before the attacks happen. They decided to let Japan hit Pearl BUT they also decide to put all the American Carriers on the Japanese flank and wait for them to blunder into their sights.(So basically Midway at Pearl.) They don't launch the attack on the carriers until the Opana Radar Site sends a signal to them that the planes have been spot on the screen. So basically i'm asking you guys this. Once the American carriers launch their planes into the air what happens next? Oh and yes Pearl will be put on full alert the moment the Japanese planes are confirmed to be heading there.

Dread Knot
05-27-14, 04:44 PM
Admiral Nagumo goes swimming and I think you will likely end up with a super-Midway event. The Japanese are bringing six carriers and veteran pilots true, but in this case Oahu is a far more formidable installation than Midway, capable of basing and dispatching far more aircraft into the air. As always, a lot depends on who gest the first blow in, but foreknowledge is a huge advantage. The only fly in the ointment might be if the US carriers are spotted early by Japanese search planes. Nagumo might elect to retreat at that point.

Even if both carrier fleets end up in a shambles, USN pilots and personnel are far more likely to be rescued by their side than Kido Butai pilots.

mapuc
05-27-14, 04:52 PM
My first impression? The war would end a lot earlier.

Markus

Dread Knot
05-27-14, 05:11 PM
Of course, one political drawback might be no declaration of war by Hitler after seeing his ally in the Pacific getting an embarrassing thumping early on. That puts Roosevelt over a barrel in Congress, trying to get involved in the war in Europe, while one is already raging in the Pacific.

Admiral Halsey
05-27-14, 05:27 PM
Of course, one political drawback might be no declaration of war by Hitler after seeing his ally in the Pacific getting an embarrassing thumping early on. That puts Roosevelt over a barrel in Congress, trying to get involved in the war in Europe, while one is already raging in the Pacific.

True but Hitler might be insane enough to still declare war. As for Nagumo retreating he'd have no choice but to fight it out at that point. He'd know that it couldn't be a coincidence that there are American carriers waiting for him on his flank.

CCIP
05-27-14, 08:21 PM
My favourite response to this kind of thing is that real historians hate what-ifs :D

The real question is just how they would know that much operational detail about the way the Japanese would carry out the Pearl attack. It's one thing to know that the Japanese might attack, another thing to know the exact composition of the task force and attack plan and tactics, and being able to find the ships without the Japanese putting up necessary precautions. And radar during that time didn't really have a great deal of precision, or at least I don't think there was quite that much operational experience in its use. So, that's quite the gamble. I don't think there would be enough confidence in this working.

Something like this would be basically threading the eye of the needle - sure, maybe, but it's one of those things where a whole bunch of things would conveniently have to turn out precisely right for the Americans to pull it off, against an already-wary Japanese task force (they themselves knew they were running big risks, which is why they got out of there fast instead of sending another wave of attacks). Considering this would all be happening while their planes were bombing American soil, I don't think this kind of plan would be approved. Too many things that could go wrong at too high a cost.

Wolferz
05-27-14, 08:22 PM
There was no radar in '41 so no IJN plane could have been spotted except with the MKII eyeball.

CCIP
05-27-14, 08:27 PM
There was no radar in '41 so no IJN plane could have been spotted except with the MKII eyeball.

That's not true. Opana was opened in 1939, using a 1937-model radar. I would seriously doubt the performance of that radar in any sort of precision, but it did detect the Japanese coming in to bomb Pearl, about 40 minutes before the bombing commenced. They thought it was just a flight of B-17s doing training, then they lost contact, and the warning wasn't passed on. So much for precision.

Admiral Halsey
05-27-14, 08:43 PM
My favourite response to this kind of thing is that real historians hate what-ifs :D

The real question is just how they would know that much operational detail about the way the Japanese would carry out the Pearl attack. It's one thing to know that the Japanese might attack, another thing to know the exact composition of the task force and attack plan and tactics, and being able to find the ships without the Japanese putting up necessary precautions. And radar during that time didn't really have a great deal of precision, or at least I don't think there was quite that much operational experience in its use. So, that's quite the gamble. I don't think there would be enough confidence in this working.

Something like this would be basically threading the eye of the needle - sure, maybe, but it's one of those things where a whole bunch of things would conveniently have to turn out precisely right for the Americans to pull it off, against an already-wary Japanese task force (they themselves knew they were running big risks, which is why they got out of there fast instead of sending another wave of attacks). Considering this would all be happening while their planes were bombing American soil, I don't think this kind of plan would be approved. Too many things that could go wrong at too high a cost.
But at the same time the rewards would be extraordinary. Think about how different the Pacific war would go if in one swoop not only is Pearl saved(Remember the moment the radar station confirms it's the Japanese coming in Peal goes to full alert) or not heavily damaged and the majority of Japan's carriers are wiped out. Also Midway was a threading the needle type situation and it worked perfectly then and is this case you'd have nearly the same scenario.

CCIP
05-27-14, 08:45 PM
Of course. But again, I think the only way this would actually fly is if somehow the fog of war disappeared completely. I just don't see how Americans would have access to that level of detail about Yamamoto's attack plans - it would be an extraordinary achievement of intelligence. You'd probably have to have an IJN rear admiral working as a spy for the Americans to really make it work.

Admiral Halsey
05-27-14, 08:50 PM
Of course. But again, I think the only way this would actually fly is if somehow the fog of war disappeared completely. I just don't see how Americans would have access to that level of detail about Yamamoto's attack plans - it would be an extraordinary achievement of intelligence. You'd probably have to have an IJN rear admiral working as a spy for the Americans to really make it work.

Or they just need to put together the information they had in RL.

Oberon
05-27-14, 09:06 PM
They knew the IJN was heading towards Pearl, they didn't know where it would be launching from. The US Armed Forces would need to be much more co-ordinated than it was at the time for the information to reach the right places at the right time. If the radar at Pearl had picked up the Japanese airforce coming in, it would still probably have taken a couple of hours to relay that information to the US carrier force steaming in circles around Hawaii. Then that would have taken another couple of hours to head into position, Nagumo would have had spotter planes circling the fleet and the first indication that the US was ready for them he would have run like hell back to Japan. Likewise if the first wave had met with overwhelming defences, the second would likely have been recalled and the attack aborted.

Honestly though, it requires a lot of things to go right for the Americans and for them to actually be organised, something that the American command system really was not in 1941.

CCIP
05-27-14, 09:13 PM
Again, that's only a success assuming reliable radar information they could actually trust, the Japanese behaving exactly as expected, scout planes finding the Japanese fleet at exactly the right time AND not provoking an immediate defensive reaction from them, and everything else working perfectly. But I'd give it something like a 1% chance of actually succeeding.

In that sense, I think disrupting their attack plan, moving the fleet, sending submarines to try and pick off the carriers would probably be a much better way of giving the Japanese war plans a headache. The Americans didn't really need such a total success to make life more difficult just for the enemy - being able to constrain their total freedom of movement in the first few months of the war (even by making them waste resources keeping their main fleet constantly ready for that Mahanian decisive line battle) would be more than enough.

Admiral Halsey
05-27-14, 09:30 PM
Ok after thinking it over i'll add a wrinkle to this. It mainly concerns HOW the US is able to discover the plans. Basically sometime in 1940 JN25 is broken. Japan thinking that the code can never be broken doesn't change it in anyway until AFTER the Attack on Pearl.

TorpX
05-27-14, 11:08 PM
I think the kind of knock-out blow that occurred at Midway would be unlikely. Possible, but not likely. The IJ air groups had a better state of training/skill/operational readiness. An ideally coordinated ambush is hard to pull off. There is a lot or room for 'operational chance' here.

More likely, the Japanese would have lost a lot more aircraft over Pearl, and we would have lost a lot fewer ships. You didn't say if the USN battlewagons would be left at anchor, as bait, or at sea, ready to pursue the enemy fleet. If our carriers attacked at the wrong moment, it could be a disaster, anyway.

I think the most interesting question is what would the Japanese do? When they realized they were being stalked, they would presumably head for safe harbors, but then what? Would they continue with their invasion of the P.I. and D.E.I., without having the advantage they were counting on, or meekly accept a difficult peace without fighting?

razark
05-28-14, 12:35 AM
US engages Japanese carriers, sinking some at a cost of at least two of their own. The battleship fleet at Pearl Harbor is saved, and instead of relying on the carrier/submarine fleet that did exist, throws it's might behind the battleships (carriers have been demonstrated as rather ineffective at this point). The US fleet meets the Japanese fleet in a massive surface engagement and looses a large number of front-line ships. The war drags on in the Pacific as the US tries to rebuild it's devastated fleet, and fails to realize the potential of carrier airpower.

Dread Knot
05-28-14, 08:10 AM
Ok after thinking it over i'll add a wrinkle to this. It mainly concerns HOW the US is able to discover the plans. Basically sometime in 1940 JN25 is broken. Japan thinking that the code can never be broken doesn't change it in anyway until AFTER the Attack on Pearl.

Maybe the best strategy at this point is to drop the strong hint in pre-war negotiations over the war in China, that the US is aware of the Japanese plans for a preemptive attack on Pearl Harbor and Clark Field in the Philippines, and that strong defensive measures are being taken.

At that point, Japan has lost its ace in the hole. Yamamoto, the chief architect of the attack on Pearl Harbor, “believed that it was impossible for Japan to win such a war.” But if there was any chance, Japan “had to gain the upper hand at the very beginning so that the United States just might be enticed to the negotiating table.” That's not going to happen if US officials already know where Japan will strike first and hardest. There were also many ambivalent Japanese leaders and diplomats who realized Japan's chances of victory were slim to none, but were fearful of voicing opposition, or expected others to. Japanese Emperor Hirohito was among those who expressed reservations about going to war at times. So did Hideki Tojo, Japan’s wartime prime minister. Knowing that their high-stakes gamble now had no chance of surprise might have been enough to convince Japanese leadership to back down.

CCIP
05-28-14, 08:37 AM
US engages Japanese carriers, sinking some at a cost of at least two of their own. The battleship fleet at Pearl Harbor is saved, and instead of relying on the carrier/submarine fleet that did exist, throws it's might behind the battleships (carriers have been demonstrated as rather ineffective at this point). The US fleet meets the Japanese fleet in a massive surface engagement and looses a large number of front-line ships. The war drags on in the Pacific as the US tries to rebuild it's devastated fleet, and fails to realize the potential of carrier airpower.

Excellent analysis :yep: That's basically that.


As for JN25 being broken, that doesn't really solve it - that might reveal the strategic plan, but it's not going to provide the kind of tactical detail you'd need to get the timing of this exactly right, leaving it a big and in all probability costly gamble.

Kptlt. Neuerburg
05-28-14, 11:16 AM
US engages Japanese carriers, sinking some at a cost of at least two of their own. The battleship fleet at Pearl Harbor is saved, and instead of relying on the carrier/submarine fleet that did exist, throws it's might behind the battleships (carriers have been demonstrated as rather ineffective at this point). The US fleet meets the Japanese fleet in a massive surface engagement and looses a large number of front-line ships. The war drags on in the Pacific as the US tries to rebuild it's devastated fleet, and fails to realize the potential of carrier airpower.
:sign_yeah: Even if the US code breakers did manage to crack the IJN's JN25 code before Pearl Harbor it wouldn't of reviled the where and when so the results would of been just as Razark said, as a vast majority in the US Navy believed that battleships where still the way to go and that aircraft carriers where no more then a passing fancy.

I also doubt that breaking the code would of had any effect on the Japanese invasion of the Philippines aside from "Dugout" Douglas McArthur being a little more ready then he already was which wasn't much to begin with. Even if the forces under McArthur had stopped the Japanese from landing in one part of the Philippines, they would landed in another as the US-Filipino forces where just too thin on the ground. Remember the Philippines was a tactical objective, they had to Philippines in order to take the Dutch East Indies. On the other hand had the US managed to hold onto Guam, Saipan and Tinian and McArthur had say 250,000 troops instead of 151,000 and a much higher state of readiness then the Invasion of the Philippines might of been different.

Bilge_Rat
05-28-14, 04:51 PM
Assuming the U.S. achieves surprise on dec. 7th, you still have 6 IJN carriers with full air groups and highly trained pilots against 3 U.S.N. carriers.

The U.S.N. carrier air groups were still basically rookies in december as you saw from the amateur performance in the first air strikes in jan.-feb. 42.

There is a good chance, you could see 2-3 U.S. carriers sunk and only 0-1 sunk on the IJN side.

At midway, the IJN only had 4 CVs present, many of their air groups had been fighting for six months, had already suffered losses and had a fair number of rookie replacement pilots and were over confident.

Lets not forget the main target of the PH attack was the U.S. CVs.

However, in the long run, even if they lose the USS Enterprise, Lexington and Saratoga, the USN still had 3 CVs: USS Hornet, Wasp, Yorktown and in a pinch, the RN could supply some as they did in late 42.