Prepare you self: Stuxnet II is coming

[TLAM Strike]

Actually it's here and it's called 'Flame'.

http://gov.aol.com/2012/05/29/cyber-intelligence-flame-the-swiss-army-knife-of-cyber-weapons/


A post by Kaspersky Lab's security products reports that Worm.Win32.Flame is "designed to carry out cyber espionage. It can steal valuable information, including but not limited to computer display contents, information about targeted systems, stored files, contact data and even audio conversations."

Another intelligence analyst said, "Flame redefines cyber espionage, it makes all the other software in that category look like cheap toys!"


http://defensetech.org/2012/05/29/flame-redefines-cyber-espionage/

[Herr-Berbunch]

Sky beat you to it a few days ago. :O:

[Catfish]

Indeed it's not new, but been around for 2 years - only Kaspersky found it now. 20 Mbs of code, obviously made by some government.
Meanwhile, there will be others ..

And in 2 years there will be no privacy on the 'net at all, anymore.:shifty:

[Skybird]

20 Mbs of code,

20 GB. :know:

[Penguin]

20 GB. :know:
20 MB :O:
Don't worry, Herr 'Penguin' Haarspalter already corrected it in your thread. :D

[Skybird]

:oops:

MH, you're a dead man. http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=195682
#2

[kraznyi_oktjabr]

:oops:

MH, you're a dead man. http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=195682
#220gigs mother ship virus ....wow:haha:
Does it come with intro movie on blue ray DVD,s?:hmmm::har:

[Penguin]

Well, I'm not quite sure, but it might slightly be against the subsim rules to kill a member....;)

However the rules state nothing about getting into your JU88 and bombing The Daily Telegraph for reporting it wrong :arrgh!:

[Sailor Steve]

Well, I'm not quite sure, but it might slightly be against the subsim rules to kill a member....;)
I've read them over several times just to be sure, and I can't find anything against it, so I guess it's okay.

[joegrundman]

I've read them over several times just to be sure, and I can't find anything against it, so I guess it's okay.

just don't use bad language while you are doing it:know:

[Herr-Berbunch]

just don't use bad language while you are doing it:know:


:har:

Or mis-spell anythink.

Or use incorrect tents.

Or incorrectly use grammer.

:smug:

[Onkel Neal]

just don't use bad language while you are doing it:know:

:up:

[vienna]

I've read them over several times just to be sure, and I can't find anything against it, so I guess it's okay.


We should consider a clause requiring said murderous intent to be posted in General Topics first; doing so would trigger long and vast argument and calumny entailing many posts and counter-posts resulting in the object(s) of the intent to pass away from old age... :D

...

[Penguin]

We should consider a clause requiring said murderous intent to be posted in General Topics first; doing so would trigger long and vast argument and calumny entailing many posts and counter-posts resulting in the object(s) of the intent to pass away from old age... :D

...

:har:



http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/2771/oldtimere.jpg

"Excuse me, Sir. After careful consideration and adequate discussion I would like to transform your physical shell into another condition. I am still slightly disappointed about your decision to vote for Fillmore."