Log in

View Full Version : Kubrick made first iPad


TarJak
08-24-11, 07:34 AM
Interesting defence tactic by Samsung in their patent battle with Apple:
http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/tablets/samsung-to-apple-kubrick-made-first-ipad-20110824-1j931.html

Dowly
08-24-11, 07:47 AM
I hope Apple loses. :O:

Blood_splat
08-24-11, 09:24 AM
I'm sorry Apple, I'm afraid I can't do that.

papa_smurf
08-24-11, 09:51 AM
I hope Apple loses. :O:

Me too, their getting too big for their own boots. I hope the EU Commission crack down on Apple just as they did to Microsoft.

MH
08-24-11, 10:19 AM
I hope Apple loses. :O:

:yep:

kiwi_2005
08-24-11, 10:48 AM
I hope Apple loses. :O:

:yep:

Morts
08-24-11, 12:25 PM
I hope Apple loses. :O:
:yep:

vienna
08-24-11, 12:27 PM
:yep:

Penguin
08-24-11, 12:34 PM
I hope Apple loses. :O:

:rock:

Herr-Berbunch
08-24-11, 12:49 PM
No Apple fans here then? Me neither. :D

Dowly
08-24-11, 12:52 PM
Me too, their getting too big for their own boots.

Precisely. It's just getting silly. What's next? Car companies start suing each
other, because clearly someone ripped someone off because all cars have
wheels under them. :doh:

And as a cherry on top, not long ago, Tim Cook said how they (Apple) like
competition. Err.. excuse me. How exactly can there be competition if you
are suing everyone who's product is even the slightest similar to yours?
Does not compute. :nope:

joea
08-24-11, 02:41 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGH-i607#Brand_controversy

In January 2007 Research In Motion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_In_Motion), creators of the BlackBerry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry) handhelds, filed suit in United States federal court (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_court) claiming the BlackJack trademark (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark) was too similar to the BlackBerry mark.[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGH-i607#cite_note-5) They allege Samsung has named their smartphone (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone) with a word beginning with "Black" just to mislead the customers that would come to the cellphone stores with the intention to purchase a BlackBerry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry). A month later the two parties settled out of court.[7] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SGH-i607#cite_note-6) In January 2008, Rogers Wireless and Fido Solutions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fido_Solutions) released the Blackjack II in Canada under the name Jack.

:roll: So when you all planning to switch to Linux?

Sailor Steve
08-24-11, 04:05 PM
I'm sorry Apple, I'm afraid I can't do that.
:rotfl2: :rock:

vienna
08-24-11, 04:58 PM
This just in re: Apple/Samsung fight:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-24/samsung-banned-from-selling-some-smartphones-in-netherlands.html

joea
08-25-11, 04:32 AM
So maybe other companies are indeed no paragons of virtue.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showpost.php?p=1724906&postcount=4

Dowly
08-25-11, 05:32 AM
So maybe other companies are indeed no paragons of virtue.

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showpost.php?p=1724906&postcount=4

No one said they were.

Apple just is the loudest one of them. :03:

TarJak
08-25-11, 05:47 AM
It will make no difference to the legal stoushes but with Jobs gone will Apple remain as dominant as it has been? http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/steve-jobs-quits-as-apple-ceo-20110825-1jat8.html

vienna
08-25-11, 06:07 PM
So maybe other companies are indeed no paragons of virtue.


Probaly not, but as Dowly said:

Apple just is the loudest one of them.

Apple is to claims of "innovation" as Michael Jackson was to "original compositions" (in case you didn't know, Jackson was sued with great regularity for plagarism and usually paid up in out of court settlements or other arrangements)...

Apple once tried to sue Microsoft (MS) after MS launched the first Windows Graphic User Interface (GUI) operating system; Apple claimed MS "stole" the "look and feel" of the Apple GUI and claimed MS was infringing on Apple's "innovation". MS went before the court and showed the judge the true source of the GUI: Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC). Xerox had developed the original GUI (and mouse, icidentally) and never bothered to copyright or patent the GUI. In fact, PARC invited representatives from other firms, including MS and Apple, to see demonstrations of the GUI. When Bill Gates saw the PARC GUI, he ordered his senior development staff to go to PARC and see if it would be possible to adapt the GUI to MS operating systems. Steve Jobs took another track and tried to pass off the GUI as an Apple innovation.

The upshot of the trial was Apple was allowed only to claim ownership of it's logo desktop icon and it 'trash bin' icon; all other claims were thrown out...

Interestingly, there was a recent lawsuit filed by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen against Apple regarding the "page turn" effect feature Apple uses on its iPad, and touts in its advertising; it appears the patent for that feature is owned by Paul Allen...