View Full Version : problems with RFB super mod
Hi,
Tried to play RFB but the first mission from Pearl is off the coast of Japan. No problem to go there but it took me more than a half of the fuel (at 3 knots). Is there any trick or are we supposed to scuttle our sub on a Japanese beach?
thanks
WernherVonTrapp
08-19-11, 06:47 PM
No trick. Try 9 to 10 knots next time. It'll use less fuel than 3 knots. Probably get you there quicker too,:D on 1/4 tank or less.;)
Daniel Prates
08-20-11, 04:12 PM
Remember that you cannot end patrol in other ports than your home base, BUT you can refuel and rearm in them. So going away from pearl, you may consider a refueling in midway.
9-10 knots worked, thank you.
I thought of refuelling but it seems there's no proper base in Midway (at least in RFB).
Daniel Prates
08-20-11, 05:24 PM
9-10 knots worked, thank you.
I thought of refuelling but it seems there's no proper base in Midway (at least in RFB).
Hum. In TMO and stock, there is. Weird.
WernherVonTrapp
08-20-11, 05:46 PM
Hmmmmm, and I've played RFB, but now that you mention it, I can't recall if there was a refit port or not at Midway.:hmmm:
Daniel Prates
08-22-11, 09:07 AM
Still, doesn't RFB has a tool for estimating maximum range in present speed, as in TMO? It is indeed the best tool to avoid running dry. Constantly plot returning courses and see if you can make it, if you have a small margin, an ample margin...
A good idea, if you think you are patrolling on the fringe of your range, is to adopt the following procedure: once every few days, maybe even a week, plot a course back home and check how much you can do. But if something new happens, such as finding a convoy and shadowing it, do that check constantly as you burn fuel at an alarming rate when on top speeds.
If you are far away - say, in metropolitan japan when your base is in pearl - a couple of days' chase can easily turn a confortable return margin into a dry-out.
Flaxpants
08-22-11, 11:37 PM
Hmmmmm, and I've played RFB, but now that you mention it, I can't recall if there was a refit port or not at Midway.:hmmm:
Yes you can refit and refuel at Midway in RFB, I have done so several times.
Handy for topping the tank up!
same tool is available in RFB. Seems right that the only solution is to check the fuel level/estimated range at a certain speed.
Still, I was surprised to see that the estimated range varyies a lot (I sometime have the best range with a speed of 8 - 9 kn, sometime with a speed of 6 kn...
I've tried RFB, TMO and FOTRS... Range issue is worse with RFB.
Also, with FOTRS, I have problems to shoot a destroyer: I can clearly see my torpedoes passing under the hull although they are supposed to be at the very minimal depth. Has anyone met the same pb?
In RFB, I've never seen any ship in the japanese harbours... any comment?
What does RSRD bring to the game?
Thank you
Sailor Steve
08-23-11, 12:47 PM
I thought of refuelling but it seems there's no proper base in Midway (at least in RFB).
There wasn't one at the beginning of the war. There was nothing there but a seaplane base for commercial flying boats to refuel. It took awhile for the naval supplies to be imported.
I don't know if this is reflected in the game or not.
Hum. In TMO and stock, there is. Weird.
Unfortunately in stock there is also a full-fledged naval base, something Midway has never had at all. Midway's "harbor" consists of a shallow bay which can hold next to nothing. Even when I was there in 1970 our little destroyer had to tie up at one of the piers outside the bay.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a325/SailorSteve/SandCloseup.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a325/SailorSteve/MidwayIslandPic.jpg
Daniel Prates
08-23-11, 04:07 PM
There wasn't one at the beginning of the war. There was nothing there but a seaplane base for commercial flying boats to refuel. (...) Midway's "harbor" consists of a shallow bay which can hold next to nothing. Even when I was there in 1970 our little destroyer had to tie up at one of the piers outside the bay.
So yamamoto's plan there in 1942 was nothing but an attempt to lure US carriers out? I mean, the island itself, if captured, would change praticaly nothing?
WernherVonTrapp
08-23-11, 05:57 PM
So yamamoto's plan there in 1942 was nothing but an attempt to lure US carriers out? I mean, the island itself, if captured, would change praticaly nothing?Actually, the Japanese had every real intention of invading and occupying Midway. Attu and Kiska were also strategic initiatives and not diversions as was once believed. Yamamoto actually had his sights on Oahu.
Sailor Steve
08-23-11, 11:04 PM
So yamamoto's plan there in 1942 was nothing but an attempt to lure US carriers out? I mean, the island itself, if captured, would change praticaly nothing?
Yamamoto's plan was for a large single battle that would wipe out the US fleet, leaving him in control of the Pacific and within easy striking distance of taking over Hawaii. You have to remember that Yamamoto didn't know we were reading his mail and knew what he was up to at that point.
http://battlestations.eu/index.php/en/our-encyclopedia/naval-battles/91-battle-of-midway?start=1
Midway itself was secondary. That said, if they captured the island it could change everything. Just because we didn't have a full-fledged base there yet didn't mean they couldn't build one.
Daniel Prates
08-24-11, 08:39 AM
:salute:
barkhorn45
08-24-11, 09:43 AM
The book "Shattered Sword"put it clearly,even if the japanese had captured midway it would have required that every need would have to be shipped in.And since it did'nt have any natural resources all supply ships would have to return empty,quite a strain on an already overstreched merchant fleet.
By the way the above book is in my opinion a "must read"if you are interested in the midway campaign.
Sailor Steve
08-24-11, 12:27 PM
An excellent point. On the other hand if he could have sunk all three of our carriers he would have had free reign at least for awhile. But then we would have sent a handful of subs to patrol the area around Midway, potentially sinking every supply ship he could have sent, which would have tied up destroyers as kaibokans didn't have the range to make the trip.
Either way it wouldn't have been easy for him, even if he had pulled it off.
WernherVonTrapp
08-24-11, 12:55 PM
The book "Shattered Sword"put it clearly,even if the japanese had captured midway it would have required that every need would have to be shipped in.And since it did'nt have any natural resources all supply ships would have to return empty,quite a strain on an already overstreched merchant fleet.
By the way the above book is in my opinion a "must read"if you are interested in the midway campaign.I just finished reading that book. Best book I ever read about the PTO. The book also offers compelling evidence that it would've been practically impossible for the Japanese to succeed in their invasion landings at Midway (even if they triumphed in the carrier battle) and for a myriad of reasons, not the least of which was alluded to by Sailor Steve (an all encompassing, exposed coral reef).
The IJN had no Higgins boats, no amphibious tractors and hadn't even conducted any practice landings or drills in preparation. They had no experience in such an amphibious landing against a well entrenched defense, as Midway was. Wake Island was not nearly as heavily entrenched/defended and we know how difficult that was for the Japanese. I could go on and on, even listing the numbers of troops, artillery and heavy weapons at each side's disposal, but my typing isn't currently up to the task right now.
Daniel Prates
08-24-11, 01:02 PM
Of the 'grand decisive engagement' doctrine -in other words, the intentions of Yamamoto - I am very aware. Also, of the historical meaning of this battle, as it was his intention to wipe out most of the american CV force, it not all of it, and eventually the opposite happened.
What I was left pondering is: did the japanese really care one bit about the island itself, other than being just a purpose for drawing in the american fleet?
WernherVonTrapp
08-24-11, 01:13 PM
What I was left pondering is: did the japanese really care one bit about the island itself, other than being just a purpose for drawing in the american fleet? It is my understanding, from the book, that it was meant (with heavy emphasis on MEANT) to be a staging point for the eventual invasion of the Hawaiian Islands. They were definitely intent on taking Midway by invasion during the battle. Needless to say that supplying the island would've presented a logistical nightmare for the Japanese.:o
BTW, for anyone interested in this amazing piece of historical literature (Shattered Sword: The True Story of the Battle of Midway), I started a thread about it some time ago at the UBI forum.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.