Feuer Frei!
08-16-11, 10:19 AM
Since Regina Dugan became the director of Darpa, the Pentagon’s top research division has signed millions of dollars’ worth of contracts with her family firm, which in turn owes her at least a quarter-million dollars. It’s an arrangement that has raised eyebrows in the research community, and has now drawn the attention of the Defense Department’s internal auditors and investigators.
The Pentagon’s Inspector General is launching an audit of those deals — and of every other research contract Darpa has signed during Dugan’s two-year tenure. This is just “the first in a series of planned audits to review [Darpa's] contracting processes,” the Inspector General’s office promises (http://www.pogo.org/resources/national-security/dod-ig-letter-to-pogo-darpa-conflicts-of-interest-20110812.html).
The probe isn’t itself an accusation of wrongdoing; just an investigation to see if any occurred. Darpa representatives have insisted that the agency acted properly in its dealings with RedXDefense — the bomb detection firm Dugan co-founded with her father, Vince Dugan. She recused herself from any decisions involving the company, they say, and RedXDefense won its $1.7 million in research contracts from Darpa (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/04/darpa-we-have-conflicts-of-interest-all-the-time/) fair and square.
“At no time did Dr. Dugan participate in any dealings between the Agency and RedXDefense related to the contract,” Darpa spokesman Eric Mazzacone told Danger Room in March. (He declined to comment for this story.)
Nevertheless, the Inspector General’s office wants to take a closer look. Not only does Dugan still own tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of stock in RedXDefense (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/03/darpa-chief-owns-darpa-contractor-stock/); according to a financial report she filed last year, the company (now led by her father (http://www.redxdefense.com/RedX_site/RedX_People.htm)) has yet to reimburse Dugan for a “note/loan” with “no schedule of payment or guarantee of repayment (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/03/all-in-the-family-darpa-chief-owed-250000-by-darpa-contractor/).”
That’s one reason, presumably, why the IG is also launching a separate inquiry into “Regina Dugan’s continued financial and familial relations with Darpa contractor RedXDefense,” the office noted in a letter (http://www.pogo.org/resources/national-security/dod-ig-letter-to-pogo-darpa-conflicts-of-interest-20110812.html) to the Project on Government Oversight (http://pogo.org/), a watchdog group.
The look into Darpa’s deal-making won’t end there, however. Every research contract issued by the agency over the last two fiscal years will be reviewed, to “determine the adequacy of Darpa’s selection, award, and administration of contracts and grants,” the IG’s office wrote in a July 26 memorandum to other military agencies. So will Darpa’s relationship with airship-builder (and one-time agency contractor) Aeros, which now counts former Darpa director Tony Tether (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/02/tony_tether_has_1/) as a member of its board of advisors (http://www.aerosml.com/boardofadvisors.php).
SOURCE (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/08/pentagon-darpa-probe/)
The Pentagon’s Inspector General is launching an audit of those deals — and of every other research contract Darpa has signed during Dugan’s two-year tenure. This is just “the first in a series of planned audits to review [Darpa's] contracting processes,” the Inspector General’s office promises (http://www.pogo.org/resources/national-security/dod-ig-letter-to-pogo-darpa-conflicts-of-interest-20110812.html).
The probe isn’t itself an accusation of wrongdoing; just an investigation to see if any occurred. Darpa representatives have insisted that the agency acted properly in its dealings with RedXDefense — the bomb detection firm Dugan co-founded with her father, Vince Dugan. She recused herself from any decisions involving the company, they say, and RedXDefense won its $1.7 million in research contracts from Darpa (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/04/darpa-we-have-conflicts-of-interest-all-the-time/) fair and square.
“At no time did Dr. Dugan participate in any dealings between the Agency and RedXDefense related to the contract,” Darpa spokesman Eric Mazzacone told Danger Room in March. (He declined to comment for this story.)
Nevertheless, the Inspector General’s office wants to take a closer look. Not only does Dugan still own tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of stock in RedXDefense (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/03/darpa-chief-owns-darpa-contractor-stock/); according to a financial report she filed last year, the company (now led by her father (http://www.redxdefense.com/RedX_site/RedX_People.htm)) has yet to reimburse Dugan for a “note/loan” with “no schedule of payment or guarantee of repayment (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/03/all-in-the-family-darpa-chief-owed-250000-by-darpa-contractor/).”
That’s one reason, presumably, why the IG is also launching a separate inquiry into “Regina Dugan’s continued financial and familial relations with Darpa contractor RedXDefense,” the office noted in a letter (http://www.pogo.org/resources/national-security/dod-ig-letter-to-pogo-darpa-conflicts-of-interest-20110812.html) to the Project on Government Oversight (http://pogo.org/), a watchdog group.
The look into Darpa’s deal-making won’t end there, however. Every research contract issued by the agency over the last two fiscal years will be reviewed, to “determine the adequacy of Darpa’s selection, award, and administration of contracts and grants,” the IG’s office wrote in a July 26 memorandum to other military agencies. So will Darpa’s relationship with airship-builder (and one-time agency contractor) Aeros, which now counts former Darpa director Tony Tether (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/02/tony_tether_has_1/) as a member of its board of advisors (http://www.aerosml.com/boardofadvisors.php).
SOURCE (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/08/pentagon-darpa-probe/)