Log in

View Full Version : National Science Foundation Funds Study on ‘That’s What She Said’ Use


Osmium Steele
07-27-11, 09:03 AM
O M G (http://biggovernment.com/jgriffith/2011/07/27/national-science-foundation-funds-study-on-thats-what-she-said-use/)

Dowly
07-27-11, 09:20 AM
I've been trying to find words for a few minutes... just.. sigh... :dead:

flatsixes
07-27-11, 09:23 AM
If you're at all surprised at this, then you haven't been paying attention (http://www.cagw.org/).

Feuer Frei!
07-27-11, 09:28 AM
Here's my reply:

http://www.cagw.org/assets/images/logos/pigs-flying.gif

Tribesman
07-27-11, 10:06 AM
Look on the bright side, if some of those tea party advocates had access to this study they wouldn't have been surprised when people laughed at their call to tea bag politicians.

flatsixes
07-27-11, 10:26 AM
Look on the bright side, if some of those tea party advocates had access to this study they wouldn't have been surprised when people laughed at their call to tea bag politicians.

Uh... You've lost me.

MaddogK
07-27-11, 10:56 AM
I guess you all missed the $9.4M NIH study of gay men that found the dude with bigger junk usually assumes the top position, and that the the top position participant enjoys more satisfaction.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/18/nih-backed-study-examined-effects-penis-size-in-gay-community/ (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/18/nih-backed-study-examined-effects-*****-size-in-gay-community/)

Just another one of those 'reputable studies' some keep referring to, eh ?

Osmium Steele
07-27-11, 11:04 AM
Just another one of those 'reputable studies' some keep referring to, eh ?

My first stalker! And one who likes to post about gay men... I'm touched, I think. (that's what she said...) :yeah:

How's Rahm working out for ya?

frau kaleun
07-27-11, 12:18 PM
All of you straight dudes will be happy to know, however, that where the ladies are concerned size doesn't matter at all.


...


...


...


...


...


:har: :har: :har: :har: :har:

*wipes tears from eyes*

Oh man I crack me up.

:O:

MaddogK
07-27-11, 12:23 PM
My first stalker! And one who likes to post about gay men... I'm touched, I think. (that's what she said...) :yeah:

How's Rahm working out for ya?

LOL, don't flatter yourself. I ve got better things to do the stalk posters, especially those who like to look at little girls privates. You've obviously changed your little girls diapers more often than I've posted about gay men, check my posting history if you don't believe me. Besides, I posted that 'reputable study' to provide some info that maybe you could use.


...and Rahm seems to be doing just fine according to the local news. As I'm in the suburbs he's not someone I need to be concerned about.

:up:

Tchocky
07-27-11, 12:29 PM
I ve got better things to do the stalk posters, especially those who like to look at little girls privates.

http://i.imgur.com/UFD3q.jpg

Tribesman
07-27-11, 01:18 PM
Uh... You've lost me.
Perhaps you had better examine the topic then.
Or at least go further than the crap that Breitbart prints.

Osmium Steele
07-27-11, 01:54 PM
I ve got better things to do the stalk posters, especially those who like to look at little girls privates. You've obviously changed your little girls diapers more often than I've posted about gay men, check my posting history if you don't believe me.

Wow... ... just wow.

You do realize that the more you post, the more you reveal about yourself, right? What am I thinking, of course you don't.

Let's not subject these fine folks to anymore of your witicisms.

ignore=true

flatsixes
07-27-11, 04:31 PM
Perhaps you had better examine the topic then.
Or at least go further than the crap that Breitbart prints.

Oh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up. Sheer genius.

Madox58
07-27-11, 04:46 PM
All of you straight dudes will be happy to know, however, that where the ladies are concerned size doesn't matter at all.


...


...


...


...


...


:har: :har: :har: :har: :har:

*wipes tears from eyes*

Oh man I crack me up.

:O:

What a blasted minute here Missy!!
:stare:

Are you saying that for over 12 years now I've been lied to?
:hmmm:

Like a straight to the freaking face fairy tale type thing??
:nope:

I'm going to need some Mental Health Care stuff now!
Thanks ever so much for crushing my simple Male Ego!!
:stare:

I'm need to go hug my Teddy Bear now.

Platapus
07-27-11, 06:18 PM
All of you straight dudes will be happy to know, however, that where the ladies are concerned size doesn't matter at all.




As The Frau tells me "It takes a gerkin to get things workin"

I love that lady. :yeah:

vienna
07-27-11, 06:42 PM
I'm going to need some Mental Health Care stuff now!
Thanks ever so much for crushing my simple Male Ego!!
:stare:

I'm need to go hug my Teddy Bear now.


"Next on Dr. Phil:..."

frau kaleun
07-27-11, 07:30 PM
Relax, guys. It ain't the size of the boat, it's the motion of the ocean.










At least that's what all the little dinghies say. :O:

Tribesman
07-27-11, 08:10 PM
Oh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up. Sheer genius.
look at the topic flatsixes:haha:

Breitbarts arguements against it actually justify it.
You get "in theory" more "bang for the buck" and get a better undersatnding of the "screw for the doe".

Since there is a military slant in this forum can you exand this reasoning into another expediture issue...like flightschool:up:
cost of investment weighed against expense of retention in regards to justifying the first expence?

Honestly it is that simple in the way people look at itwho don't look at itas in.....government + expene= outrage.

It is one of those isues which when looked at either way can give a strong indication this way or that. But as in life it ain't that simple.
government + spending for a vague reason that can be sold as = OK yeah.


Just to say it is Galway race week and that last line shoud be upfurther in the text and I may put it in the right place tomorrow

Growler
07-27-11, 08:20 PM
Relax, guys. It ain't the size of the boat, it's the motion of the ocean.

At least that's what all the little dinghies say. :O:

Let's just say that there's usually little complaint when one speaks in tongues.

It's far easier to know the language of love when one is a cunning linguist.

frau kaleun
07-27-11, 08:28 PM
Let's just say that there's usually little complaint when one speaks in tongues.

It's far easier to know the language of love when one is a cunning linguist.

I am intrigued by your ideas, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter. :O:

Aramike
07-27-11, 08:33 PM
Wow. This thread has everything - political outrage, personal attacks, homosexual and pedophilia claims, crude humor...

I guess the only thing missing is a point. :ping:

Growler
07-27-11, 08:43 PM
:O:

Looks like you already have.

Lord Justice
07-27-11, 09:30 PM
Looks like you already have.:har:

Sailor Steve
07-27-11, 09:32 PM
Wow. This thread has everything - political outrage, personal attacks, homosexual and pedophilia claims, crude humor...

I guess the only thing missing is a point. :ping:
This thread has a point. Several in fact. Unfortunately they are all pointing in different directions.

Onkel Neal
07-28-11, 01:58 AM
Wow. This thread has everything - political outrage, personal attacks, homosexual and pedophilia claims, crude humor...

I guess the only thing missing is a point. :ping:

Haha, nice. :up:

Osmium Steele
07-28-11, 07:33 AM
This thread has a point. Several in fact. Unfortunately they are all pointing in different directions.

And here's another one!

http://zippythepinhead.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/other/images/ZA2003lgcover.gif