Feuer Frei!
07-25-11, 06:57 PM
http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2011/07/MFC_SMSS_photo1_h.jpg
Meet Lockheed Martin’s Squad Mission Support System, a $500,000 robotic mule. If it can get the gear off the backs of soldiers during an ongoing trial run in New Mexico without overturning or driving off into the sunset, the Army wants to send it to Afghanistan.
No wonder: deployed soldiers have dozens of pounds of batteries, ammo, communications equipment and other kit they have to carry on their backs, on top of heavy armor. That’s why the military’s enamored with a variety of remotely controlled and even wearable machines (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wearable-robots-could-solve-soldiers-hauling-woes/) to lighten the load. Some are deeply quirky, designed to resemble a headless dog (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/video-militarys-robotic-pack-mule-battles-the-mud/).
The Squad Mission Support System ain’t one of them. It looks as conventional as any six wheeled hauler you’d see on an admittedly large loading dock, the size of a car with a flat back, readying it to strap up to 600 lbs. worth of equipment (http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2010/MFC_102510_LMsSMSSAutonomousVehicletoDemo.html) onboard. It uses ladar, or laser radar, to identify the unit it needs to follow (http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2011/04/12/06.xml) and drives off autonomously behind.
By the fall, the Army wants to send the vehicle to Afghanistan. Only one problem: it may not really be ready for the rough terrain.
Even the more exotic robo-mules have trouble with steep inclines (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/07/video-robotic-p/) and deep mud. Afghanistan has a lack of paved roads, which prove troublesome for human driven vehicles to navigate. Its eastern regions are especially hilly. Inside Defense (http://insidedefense.com/) reported that Army testing officials concede that the Squad Mission Support System most likely needs to be used only on “relatively level terrain.” It remains to be seen how level “relatively” is — that’s being determined now at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.
One advantage of the system: it can recharge soldiers’ battery packs while it hauls.
But even if the Squad Mission Support System doesn’t work as advertised, Lockheed has other gear-hauling tech in development. Instead of a vehicle, it’s built an exoskeleton called the HULC (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/exoskeletons-walk-the-floor-at-armys-d-c-expo/) — the Human Universal Load Carrier — that should haul up to 200 lbs. worth of equipment on its own, as well as prepare for a fight against the Queen of the aliens (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqzHdKqZAmo). (Competitor Raytheon has its own exoskeleton, which it bills as a real life Iron Man armor (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/09/new-video-hypes-real-life-iron-man-outfit/).) Which system should any self-respecting robot fan root for?
SOURCE (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/07/army-preps-robot-mule-for-afghan-action/)
Meet Lockheed Martin’s Squad Mission Support System, a $500,000 robotic mule. If it can get the gear off the backs of soldiers during an ongoing trial run in New Mexico without overturning or driving off into the sunset, the Army wants to send it to Afghanistan.
No wonder: deployed soldiers have dozens of pounds of batteries, ammo, communications equipment and other kit they have to carry on their backs, on top of heavy armor. That’s why the military’s enamored with a variety of remotely controlled and even wearable machines (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wearable-robots-could-solve-soldiers-hauling-woes/) to lighten the load. Some are deeply quirky, designed to resemble a headless dog (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/video-militarys-robotic-pack-mule-battles-the-mud/).
The Squad Mission Support System ain’t one of them. It looks as conventional as any six wheeled hauler you’d see on an admittedly large loading dock, the size of a car with a flat back, readying it to strap up to 600 lbs. worth of equipment (http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2010/MFC_102510_LMsSMSSAutonomousVehicletoDemo.html) onboard. It uses ladar, or laser radar, to identify the unit it needs to follow (http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2011/04/12/06.xml) and drives off autonomously behind.
By the fall, the Army wants to send the vehicle to Afghanistan. Only one problem: it may not really be ready for the rough terrain.
Even the more exotic robo-mules have trouble with steep inclines (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/07/video-robotic-p/) and deep mud. Afghanistan has a lack of paved roads, which prove troublesome for human driven vehicles to navigate. Its eastern regions are especially hilly. Inside Defense (http://insidedefense.com/) reported that Army testing officials concede that the Squad Mission Support System most likely needs to be used only on “relatively level terrain.” It remains to be seen how level “relatively” is — that’s being determined now at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.
One advantage of the system: it can recharge soldiers’ battery packs while it hauls.
But even if the Squad Mission Support System doesn’t work as advertised, Lockheed has other gear-hauling tech in development. Instead of a vehicle, it’s built an exoskeleton called the HULC (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/exoskeletons-walk-the-floor-at-armys-d-c-expo/) — the Human Universal Load Carrier — that should haul up to 200 lbs. worth of equipment on its own, as well as prepare for a fight against the Queen of the aliens (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqzHdKqZAmo). (Competitor Raytheon has its own exoskeleton, which it bills as a real life Iron Man armor (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/09/new-video-hypes-real-life-iron-man-outfit/).) Which system should any self-respecting robot fan root for?
SOURCE (http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/07/army-preps-robot-mule-for-afghan-action/)