Skybird
06-23-11, 04:01 AM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13883331
All German newspapers I looked into were unable to report this in a neutral and objective manner, but turned it into offensive name-calling and "reminders" of charges that by content of their claims simply never were true, saying that Wilders were a blind "hater", a "discriminator", or turned into a fascist himself when brandmarking Islam as a totalitarian ideology, or now were allowed to run around and offend people.
The thought police now considers to bring him to the European Human Rights Court. It seems they assume that it will be more biased than the Dutch court. I wonder why?
All German newspapers I looked into were unable to report this in a neutral and objective manner, but turned it into offensive name-calling and "reminders" of charges that by content of their claims simply never were true, saying that Wilders were a blind "hater", a "discriminator", or turned into a fascist himself when brandmarking Islam as a totalitarian ideology, or now were allowed to run around and offend people.
The thought police now considers to bring him to the European Human Rights Court. It seems they assume that it will be more biased than the Dutch court. I wonder why?