PDA

View Full Version : 12 Things That The Mainstream Media Is Being Strangely Quiet About Right Now


Feuer Frei!
06-22-11, 08:53 PM
As the mainstream media continues to be obsessed with Anthony Weiner and his bizarre adventures on Twitter, much more serious events are happening around the world that are getting very little attention. In America today, if the mainstream media does not cover something it is almost as if it never happened.
The following are 12 things that the mainstream media is being strangely quiet about right now....
#1 The crisis at the Fort Calhoun nuclear facility in Nebraska has received almost no attention in the national mainstream media.
Back on June 7th, there was a fire (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2011/20110608en.html#en46932) at Fort Calhoun. The official story is that the fire was in an electrical switchgear room at the plant. The facility lost power to a pump that cools the spent fuel pool for approximately 90 minutes. According to the Omaha Public Power District, the fire was quickly extinguished and no radioactive material was released.
The following sequence of events is directly from the Omaha Public Power District website (http://www.oppd.com/AboutUs/22_007105)....


#2 Most Americans are aware that the U.S. is involved in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. However, the truth is that the U.S. military is also regularly bombing Yemen (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43333763/ns/world_news-the_new_york_times/) and parts of Pakistan (http://www.japantoday.com/category/world/view/19-killed-in-2-u-s-drone-attacks-in-northwestern-pakistan). If you count the countries where the U.S. has special forces and/or covert operatives on the ground, the U.S. is probably "active" in more countries in the Middle East than it is not. Now there are even persistent rumors that U.S. ground units are being prepared to go into Libya (http://www.infowars.com/u-s-invasion-of-libya-set-for-october/). Are we watching the early stages of World War 3 unfold before our eyes in slow motion?

#3 The crisis at Fukushima continues to get worse.
The mainstream media is not paying as much attention to Fukushima these days, but that doesn't mean that it is not a major league nightmare.
Elevated levels of radiation are being reported by Japanese bloggers all over eastern Japan (http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/intelligent-energy/elevated-radiation-levels-widespread-in-eastern-japan/7160). There are reports of sick children all over the region. One adviser to the government of Japan says that an area approximately 17 times the size of Manhattan is probably going to be uninhabitable (http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2011/06/201161664828302638.html).
Of course the mainstream media has been telling us all along that Fukushima is nothing to be too concerned about and that authorities in Japan have everything under control.
If the mainstream media is not going to tell us the truth, how are they going to continue to have credibility?


#4 Members of Congress continue to mention Christians as a threat to national security. For example, during a recent Congressional hearing (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBAmPxSI8bo&feature=player_embedded) U.S. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee warned that "Christian militants" might try to "bring down the country" and that such groups need to be investigated.


#5 China's eastern province of Zhejiang has experienced that worst flooding that it has seen in 55 years (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43454430/ns/weather/). 2 million people have already been forced to leave their homes. China has already been having huge problems with their crops over the past few years and this is only going to make things worse.


#6 Thanks to the Dodd-Frank Act, over the counter trading of gold and silver is going to be illegal (http://www.zerohedge.com/article/trading-over-counter-gold-and-silver-be-illegal-beginning-july-15?page=1) starting on July 15th. Or at least that is what some companies apparently now believe.
Apparently, Section 742(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act prohibits anyone "from entering into, or offering to enter into, a transaction in any commodity with a person that is not an eligible contract participant or an eligible commercial entity, on a leveraged or margined basis."

#7 All over the world, huge cracks are appearing for no discernible reason. For example, a massive crack that is approximately 3 kilometers long (http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2011/03/07/scientists-are-sounding-the-alarm-the-mysterious-cracks-appear-across-the-planet/) recent appeared in southern Peru. Also, a 500 foot long crack suddenly appeared recently in the state of Michigan (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtTmnXt1TUQ&feature=player_embedded). When you also throw in all of the gigantic sinkholes (http://thisistheendoftheworldasweknowit.com/archives/sinkholes-2010) that have been opening all over the world, it is easy to conclude that the planet is becoming very unstable.


#8 According to U.S. Forest Service officials, the largest wildfire in Arizona state history has now covered more than 500,000 acres (http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/06/18/20110618wallow-fire-update.html). But based on the coverage it is being given by the mainstream media you would think that it is a non-event.


#9 There are reports that North Korea has tested a "super EMP weapon (http://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/super-emp-emp-northkorea-nuke/2011/06/16/id/400260)" which would be capable of taking out most of the U.S. power grid in a single shot. The North Koreans are apparently about to conduct another nuclear test and that has some Obama administration officials very concerned.


#10 All over the United States, "active shooter drills (http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2011/06/you-can-no-longer-think-of-yourselves.html)" are being conducted in our public schools. Often, most of the students are not told that these drills are fake. Instead, students often go through hours of terror as they think a hostage situation or a shooting spree is really taking place.


#11 NASA has just launched a "major" preparedness initiative for all NASA personnel.
The following is an excerpt about this plan from NASA's own website (http://www.nasa.gov/centers/hq/emergency/personalPreparedness/index.html)....
"A major initiative has been placed on Family/Personal Preparedness for all NASA personnel. The NASA Family/Personal Preparedness Program is designed to provide awareness, resources, and tools to the NASA Family (civil servants and contractors) to prepare for an emergency situation. The most important assets in the successful completion of NASA’s mission are our employees’ and their families. We are taking the steps to prepare our workforce, but it is your personal obligation to prepare yourself and your families for emergencies."

#12 Over the past week over 40 temporary "no fly zones" (http://tfr.faa.gov/tfr2/list.html) have been declared by the FAA. This is very highly unusual. Nobody seems to know exactly why this is happening.


So what do all of these things mean?
It would be nice if the mainstream media would examine some of these important issues more closely and do some honest reporting on them.


SOURCE (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/12-things-that-the-mainstream-media-is-being-strangely-quiet-about-right-now)

Krauter
06-22-11, 09:12 PM
So basically the world is going down the toilet is what your saying...

Also, :rotfl2: @ the Norks Super EMP weapon....

Feuer Frei!
06-22-11, 09:25 PM
Nah, not going down the toilet, at least not yet anyways.
Just some (more) coverage on these matters would be something to behold.

TLAM Strike
06-22-11, 09:34 PM
Also, :rotfl2: @ the Norks Super EMP weapon....

I must echo Krauter's strategic assessment of North Korea's Super EMP weapon...

:rotfl2:

Also...
#12 Over the past week over 40 temporary "no fly zones" (http://tfr.faa.gov/tfr2/list.html) have been declared by the FAA. This is very highly unusual. Nobody seems to know exactly why this is happening.

OMG it says why right on the link! Just click 'Type' listed and it will explain the NOTAM, quite a few relate to the fire in Arizona- clearing air space for firefighting aircraft.

Krauter
06-22-11, 09:58 PM
That and Osama's successors probably P.O'd that the US killed Osama...
:haha:

Betonov
06-23-11, 02:24 AM
If the mainstream media is not going to tell us the truth, how are they going to continue to have credibility?

You wrote that, like it hasn't happened already

Tribesman
06-23-11, 02:37 AM
So that article is about lack of media coverage on really big stories?
It has real stories amazingly taken from the mainstream media where they are covered.:hmmm:
It also has some crazy conspiracies and rumours which are not covered by the mainstream media but can be found in places like "its the end of the world buy gold coins to get ready for the 2012 doomsday":har:

Schwieger
06-23-11, 02:43 AM
Are we watching the early stages of World War 3 unfold before our eyes in slow motion?

In the event of a war with China... U.S. will be rolled over pretty easily... US army is outnumber nearly 140 to 1 by nearly 11 million reserve Chinese troops.. and if we're mulling about in Libya and the Middle East, then things will look even worse in the event of this hypothetical war..

As for excess US intervention in the Middle East.. well, if it were me, there wouldn't be a Middle East, save for Israel.

Raptor1
06-23-11, 03:29 AM
In the event of a war with China... U.S. will be rolled over pretty easily... US army is outnumber nearly 140 to 1 by nearly 11 million reserve Chinese troops.. and if we're mulling about in Libya and the Middle East, then things will look even worse in the event of this hypothetical war..


I'd like to know where you get those numbers, as far as I know the entire Chinese army doesn't number more than some 3 million men, including reserves. Even if it did have so many troops...140 to 1?

Regardless, where will they even fight? Will the US invade China, or the other way around? I can't see anyone doing anything like that...

joea
06-23-11, 05:06 AM
Interesting, though some of them like the no-fly zones are non-issues. Or utterly ridiculous like the Nork EMP-the huge cracks thing well hello the Earth is always moving and cracking. :yawn:

Castout
06-23-11, 06:00 AM
3 and 5 are the ones that concern me.

Jimbuna
06-23-11, 06:14 AM
Thankfully I live in the UK safety zone, away from any credible mainstream media :O:

Feuer Frei!
06-23-11, 06:20 AM
So that article is about lack of media coverage on really big stories?
It seems so doesn't it.
It has real stories amazingly taken from the mainstream media where they are covered.:hmmm:
Covered to an extent. None of the events listed in op are what you would call "covered", and certainly not updated.
The public has to do their own delving and research. With non-critical wordly issues, sure, no problem, dig around and play Detective all you want.
It also has some crazy conspiracies and rumours which are not covered by the mainstream media
Which ones? but can be found in places like "its the end of the world buy gold coins to get ready for the 2012 doomsday":har:
Yep, adverts on websites, hot diggity dog. Now there's a new thing.

mookiemookie
06-23-11, 06:46 AM
Thankfully I live in the UK safety zone, away from any credible mainstream media :O:

Thread winner right here!

Tribesman
06-23-11, 07:23 AM
It seems so doesn't it.

Not once you look at it.


Covered to an extent. None of the events listed in op are what you would call "covered", and certainly not updated.

Rubbish.
Take that MSNBC piece which is a workup of a NYT piece, both of which are certainly mainstream. See how often the subject has been updated since the cited article, then look back at the archives and see how many years they have been updating the story for...or should that be decades:know:

Which ones?
Alex Jones is always an old reliable when it comes to crazyness, I wonder if he pops up:rotfl2:

Yep, adverts on websites, hot diggity dog. Now there's a new thing.
The problem there being that those are the articles on the end of the world doomsday "newsoutlet" that is linked to in the opening article

I think the problem here FF is that you have linked to an article and are defending what it says without even looking at what it is claiming and the "evidence" it presents

edit to add, sorry I just noticed the source itself runs lots of panic buy gold now "news" articles as well as running lots of buy gold adverts, so it isn't just a case of it linking to dodgy "news outlets" it really is crazy one itself.

Feuer Frei!
06-23-11, 07:59 AM
I just noticed the source itself runs lots of panic buy gold now "news" articles as well as running lots of buy gold adverts, so it isn't just a case of it linking to dodgy "news outlets" it really is crazy one itself.
You know, i was going to retort with a big paragraph about gold-buying and the ins and outs of filtering out adverts on news sites, but, what it really comes down to is that we all have different B.S. Filter meters. And we all have different tastes in news articles.
In relation to the BS Filter meter, i'm indicating filtering out the adverts and reading the article, which you (allegedly did).
The filtering out of the adverts, you didn't.
In relation to differing tastes in news (worthy) stories/articles, we all have different tastes, without the adverts of gold-buying and impending doom of the world within eye-shot of the articles.
Well, that's that then.
Let me pose a question to you:
If the BBC were to have adverts of water purifiers and book adverts of the end is nigh and bunker down, the end of the world is coming adverts plastered around it's reputable and might i add very good reporting, would you dismiss the articles?
Or use your BS Filter meter (or rather the advert filter)?

mookiemookie
06-23-11, 08:16 AM
You know, i was going to retort with a big paragraph about gold-buying and the ins and outs of filtering out adverts on news sites, but, what it really comes down to is that we all have different B.S. Filter meters. And we all have different tastes in news articles.
In relation to the BS Filter meter, i'm indicating filtering out the adverts and reading the article, which you (allegedly did).
The filtering out of the adverts, you didn't.
In relation to differing tastes in news (worthy) stories/articles, we all have different tastes, without the adverts of gold-buying and impending doom of the world within eye-shot of the articles.
Well, that's that then.
Let me pose a question to you:
If the BBC were to have adverts of water purifiers and book adverts of the end is nigh and bunker down, the end of the world is coming adverts plastered around it's reputable and might i add very good reporting, would you dismiss the articles?
Or use your BS Filter meter (or rather the advert filter)?

Rationalize it however you want, but the majority of the kook conspiracy theorist websites (Prison Planet, Infowars, etc) run those sort of ads. When you see them, you know immediately what kind of website you're dealing with.

Feuer Frei!
06-23-11, 08:23 AM
Rationalize it however you want, but the majority of the kook conspiracy theorist websites (Prison Planet, Infowars, etc) run those sort of ads. When you see them, you know immediately what kind of website you're dealing with.
Don't get me wrong, kooks as you call em' they are.
I don't belive in their bs theories and beliefs one bit.
Not trying to rationalize them.

Tribesman
06-23-11, 08:26 AM
You know, i was going to retort with a big paragraph about gold-buying and the ins and outs of filtering out adverts on news sites, but, what it really comes down to is that we all have different B.S. Filter meters. And we all have different tastes in news articles.
In relation to the BS Filter meter, i'm indicating filtering out the adverts and reading the article, which youThe filtering out of the adverts, you didn't.
In relation to differing tastes in news (worthy) stories/articles, we all have different tastes, without the adverts of gold-buying and impending doom of the world within eye-shot of the articles.
Well, that's that then.

Wrong, the problem is that the adverts about impending doom are carried on sites that are doing articles about impending doom.
So it isn't about filtering out articles or adverts as filtering out one still leaves the other, so either filter out both , in which case ignore all the content of the sites or filter out neither and make a judgement on all that is there.

(allegedly did).

Nothing allegedly about it, but what I can say without a shadow of a doubt is that you didn't actually read the article at all as it has been shown repeatedly by many people pointing out that the article contains all that is needed to show that most of its claims are either pure bull or crazy speculation from loony sources.

If the BBC were to have adverts of water purifiers and book adverts of the end is nigh and bunker down the end of the world is coming adverts plastered around it's reputable and might i add very good reporting, would you dismiss the articles?

If the BBC had articles telling me of the need to buy gold while prices are at record levels and adverts selling gold at even further inflated prices I would say that its articles are just bollox and its adverts are for real rip off merchants.

Feuer Frei!
06-23-11, 08:44 AM
If the BBC had articles telling me of the need to buy gold while prices are at record levels and adverts selling gold at even further inflated prices I would say that its articles are just bollox and its adverts are for real rip off merchants.
Now we are deviating into the realm of no need.
Firstly, you had an issue with gold adverts on sites, now it comes down to wether or not prices are inflated or if they are then it's a rip-off :haha:
Either gold adverts are bs or some gold adverts are ok, so long as you are not getting ripped off.
As to the BBC, you would refute the BBC reporting prowess and reputation and ie it's articles IF there were any of the aforementioned adverts?
Really? Unless i read it wrong.
That just proves that you are black and white in your view(s) about news sites and if the advertise or not.
But then again, i call news paper sites dodgy too if they have dating links on them.
Read your news article about Belfast riots whilst seeking your soul mate on your second monitor. :yeah:

TLAM Strike
06-23-11, 09:00 AM
In the event of a war with China... U.S. will be rolled over pretty easily... US army is outnumber nearly 140 to 1 by nearly 11 million reserve Chinese troops..
????
:haha:
Our Air Force(s) have more planes, our Navy has greater Tonnage and we have more Strategic Arms. :yeah:

Tribesman
06-23-11, 10:22 AM
Now we are deviating into the realm of no need.

It answers the question you asked.

Firstly, you had an issue with gold adverts on sites
No I didn't. If you notice I already pointed out to you that it wasn't the case and you were wrong

now it comes down to wether or not prices are inflated or if they are then it's a rip-off
Two wrongs one after the other.

Either ........
Unless you get the first bits right instead of wrong you shouldn't move to a conclusion

Unless i read it wrong
We have a winner:up:



Read your news article about Belfast riots whilst seeking your soul mate on your second monitor.
You would have a point if the articles about the riots were telling you that if you got a soul mate through a dating agency you would be safe from sectarian idiots playing silly buggers:03:

Schwieger
06-23-11, 12:26 PM
I'd like to know where you get those numbers, as far as I know the entire Chinese army doesn't number more than some 3 million men, including reserves. Even if it did have so many troops...140 to 1?

Regardless, where will they even fight? Will the US invade China, or the other way around? I can't see anyone doing anything like that...


Take a look at some the articles here Raptor... http://wuxinghongqi.blogspot.com/2011_03_27_archive.html
might surprise you.

Don't forget that at any given moment the US only has a couple hundred thousand battle ready troops.

TLAM Strike
06-23-11, 12:59 PM
Take a look at some the articles here Raptor... http://wuxinghongqi.blogspot.com/2011_03_27_archive.html
might surprise you.

Don't forget that at any given moment the US only has a couple hundred thousand battle ready troops.

They can have a billion troops and it won't matter. The PRC lacks the ability to transport them much farther than Taiwan's west coast.

The PLAAF has less than 200 medium/heavy transport aircraft.
The PLAN has about 100 medium/heavy assault ships (about 70 of them are short range vessels). They also have about 400 landing craft. They have the ability to move there two Marine Brigades and some follow up forces in their neighborhood but that's about it.

The US has six MEUs with intergraded air and armor that can strike anywhere in the world. The US also has two Airborne Divisions that can do likewise.

Also lets not forget the USAF has planes that can fly from the Midwest and bomb targets undetected in the middle east. The Chinese air force's planes can't fly much farther than Guam.

The PRC has sufficient forces to hassle Taiwan or Vietnam or maybe Japan but short of using nuclear bombs they can't really try to fight the US.

Krauter
06-23-11, 01:01 PM
:shifty: If you don't count the US' national guard units you can't count the Chinese reserve units....

Also, do the Chinese run similar theories to the Norks where EVERY citizen is considered to be in the reserve army? If so, wow, 1 Billion, give or take, combatants against the US... that'd suck big ones.

Also, I would hazard a guess that neither the US nor China will want to invade the other for fear of nuclear retaliation or just fear of a meat grinder.. it'd probably be played out in some third world country or theatre that is not close to home (Middle East, Africa, Pacific)

Lord Justice
06-23-11, 01:15 PM
They can have a billion troops and it won't matter. I fear you are being drawn in to a speculative debate. ;) is the bait worth such gust?

Raptor1
06-23-11, 01:44 PM
Take a look at some the articles here Raptor... http://wuxinghongqi.blogspot.com/2011_03_27_archive.html
might surprise you.

Don't forget that at any given moment the US only has a couple hundred thousand battle ready troops.

I can't see anywhere that confirms your numbers, though obviously I haven't looked at the whole thing.

I fear you are being drawn in to a speculative debate. ;) is the bait worth such gust?

Aren't all debates speculative? Or at least most of them. Regardless, those are the most interesting ones...

Lord Justice
06-23-11, 02:12 PM
Aren't all debates speculative? Or at least most of them. Regardless, those are the most interesting ones...Clearly you are a hard pounding gentleman whom embraces opinions tightly, this I observe, but is the subject matter worthy enough? :hmmm:

Krauter
06-23-11, 03:01 PM
If he's taking the time out of day to post here I'd say it is worthy enough :haha:

Oberon
06-23-11, 03:49 PM
http://www.homesweethomefront.co.uk/images/gif/hshf_img_journey.gif

TarJak
06-23-11, 04:03 PM
Thankfully I live in the UK safety zone, away from any credible mainstream media :O:
That's OK FF and I also live in the AU safety zone where no credible media exists.

Castout
06-23-11, 07:55 PM
I must add Bahrain regime persecution, torture and unjustified trial of demonstrators, activists, oppositions and medical staffs and doctors.

:nope:

Castout
06-23-11, 08:03 PM
Take a look at some the articles here Raptor... http://wuxinghongqi.blogspot.com/2011_03_27_archive.html
might surprise you.

Don't forget that at any given moment the US only has a couple hundred thousand battle ready troops.

How does she if she is a she write so much with so poor English :hmmm:.

It's dizzying trying read that blog.

Tribesman
06-24-11, 02:42 AM
I must add Bahrain regime persecution
Good point , Bahrain hasn't made a headline since the 22nd, the media really must buck its act up, two days is too long for a dodgy regime to be out of the headlines.
Obviously they spent too much time yesterday on their middle eastern coverage doing Libya, Syria, Yemen(damn thats the story that isn't covered and certainly isn't updated), Israel/Palestine (as usual), Saudi, Iran, Iraq and Egypt instead of real news....why won't the lamestream media cover these issues eh? why are they being so quiet?:88)

What we really need is for the media to give more real stories about fluffy kittens stuck in strange places or Pandas with erectile disfunction

joea
06-24-11, 04:00 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysOhDN9YZqc

mapuc
06-24-11, 06:24 PM
Number 11, is gonna be used by those who believs in 2012 as a given truth.

Markus