Skybird
05-30-11, 05:04 AM
And another bot-translation, this time from Swiss weekly publication "Die Weltwoche". There is plenty of lingual nuances that the bot does not get, I urge you to try the German text that non-registered readers also can read as a copy here. (http://www.achgut.com/dadgdx/index.php/dadgd/article/in_kommunistischer_tradition/)
When I red this text two days ago, I was scared. Simply scared, and I mean that literally. It sounds like being in the best tradition of communist reeducation camps in China and the Warsaw Pact, and like - as the article clkaims - the language used in Orwell'S 1984. And our Merkel who is falling for it: totally disconnected from reality, maximising damages to Germany from the Euro, the EU, and now this. Her academic tunnel-view works to her disadvantage here, and nhewre past as the former FDJ (GDR'S youth organisation) chief secretary for propaganda is showing in her unb earavbly, stupid, brain-mocking empty word shells and phrases bare of any meaning and content. All she is doing by now is killing her party-internal rivals (that'S why she is left with no competent personell around her), and opportunistically conspirating to secure her power.
----
The nine professors do the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Federal Government "Global Change", that the world turns away quickly from fossil energy sources and climate-friendly is. The "carbon-based economic model" of our era, a "normatively untenable," they write. The transformation of climate impact is therefore "morally necessary as well as the abolition of slavery and the outlawing of child labor." With nuclear energy should also be final.
So far, the Environment has published a 34-page summary that outlines his "social contract for a big transformation." (The full version will follow soon.) You could put the document as an aberration aloof professors aside, if it were not written by influential people. The Environmental Council is led by Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, who as "climate consultant" a direct line to Chancellor Angela Merkel and EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso. Councillor Stefan Rahmstorf is one of the leaders of the IPCC and has, in the German media, challenging anyone who harbors doubts about the omniscience.
First, notice that the paper is full of empty words. There is of "planetary guard rails" and a new "business basis" of the company mentioned. We read of "assertive air pioneer alliances" that will enable a "countermeasures fast, transformative." It was important to promote a "comprehensive reconstruction of insight, prudence and foresight." The Environment developed "polycentric transformation approaches with different levels of ambition," by the "frequency of compressions" an "irreversible global dynamics" to produce.
Profound belief in internationalism
The Environmental Council is sending the state a central role. He speaks of a "creative state," the "for the transformation actively setting priorities", while "greater participation opportunities for its citizens offers." He who thinks but to open-ended democratic decision rights will be disappointed: If the "strengthening of citizenship" be granted "under the umbrella of sustainable policy objectives." Give the individual the "transformative power of his actions" and sees a "basic awareness" developed begins at school a corresponding brainwashing. The Environmental adjusts itself in the tradition of the GDR. There was the "education for socialist personality" ultimate objective of education, here it is the one toward climate-friendly personality.
The proposals of how society should be organized in the future are reminiscent of the totalitarian police state in George Orwell's novel "1984". For Orwell it was a "Ministry of Truth," a "Junior Anti-Sex" and a "thought police". Similarly, the Environment wants the civil society is a "scientific expert community" set aside, which ensures that the company complies with the sustainability process. All laws are to a "comprehensive, mandatory climate impact assessment" through. The Parliament also is extended to a "future chamber" that "the interests of future generations" is responsible. This is not democratic, but to be filled, "for example, by drawing lots."
Obvious is a deep belief in internationalism. Thus, the nine professors mean by the "creative state" rather than the traditional nation state, but "global cooperation mechanisms," which explicitly on "institutions braid" orient the EU. A "guided political leadership" to enforce, should continue as a "UN Council for Sustainable Development", an "International Organization for Sustainable Energy", a "Global Commission on Sustainable Land Use" and a global organization, "sustainable urbanization" for to ensure compliance by nation states their "internationally verifiable Dekarbonisierungsfahrpläne." This will cost you big money: By 2030, it be a year between 200 billion and one trillion U.S. dollars, "the period from 2030 to 2050 actually much higher."
The "Great Transformation" of the German Environmental Council does not resemble in name only after the "Great Leap Forward." End of the 1950s wanted to modernize and industrialize the communist leadership of China under the title the country with a huge effort and. To achieve that, should the "revolutionary enthusiasm of the masses" to be mobilized. The Chinese leadership, summed up the country's population in communities. This lead-directly into the disaster. About thirty million people died of starvation in the coming years.
-----
When I red this text two days ago, I was scared. Simply scared, and I mean that literally. It sounds like being in the best tradition of communist reeducation camps in China and the Warsaw Pact, and like - as the article clkaims - the language used in Orwell'S 1984. And our Merkel who is falling for it: totally disconnected from reality, maximising damages to Germany from the Euro, the EU, and now this. Her academic tunnel-view works to her disadvantage here, and nhewre past as the former FDJ (GDR'S youth organisation) chief secretary for propaganda is showing in her unb earavbly, stupid, brain-mocking empty word shells and phrases bare of any meaning and content. All she is doing by now is killing her party-internal rivals (that'S why she is left with no competent personell around her), and opportunistically conspirating to secure her power.
----
The nine professors do the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Federal Government "Global Change", that the world turns away quickly from fossil energy sources and climate-friendly is. The "carbon-based economic model" of our era, a "normatively untenable," they write. The transformation of climate impact is therefore "morally necessary as well as the abolition of slavery and the outlawing of child labor." With nuclear energy should also be final.
So far, the Environment has published a 34-page summary that outlines his "social contract for a big transformation." (The full version will follow soon.) You could put the document as an aberration aloof professors aside, if it were not written by influential people. The Environmental Council is led by Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, who as "climate consultant" a direct line to Chancellor Angela Merkel and EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso. Councillor Stefan Rahmstorf is one of the leaders of the IPCC and has, in the German media, challenging anyone who harbors doubts about the omniscience.
First, notice that the paper is full of empty words. There is of "planetary guard rails" and a new "business basis" of the company mentioned. We read of "assertive air pioneer alliances" that will enable a "countermeasures fast, transformative." It was important to promote a "comprehensive reconstruction of insight, prudence and foresight." The Environment developed "polycentric transformation approaches with different levels of ambition," by the "frequency of compressions" an "irreversible global dynamics" to produce.
Profound belief in internationalism
The Environmental Council is sending the state a central role. He speaks of a "creative state," the "for the transformation actively setting priorities", while "greater participation opportunities for its citizens offers." He who thinks but to open-ended democratic decision rights will be disappointed: If the "strengthening of citizenship" be granted "under the umbrella of sustainable policy objectives." Give the individual the "transformative power of his actions" and sees a "basic awareness" developed begins at school a corresponding brainwashing. The Environmental adjusts itself in the tradition of the GDR. There was the "education for socialist personality" ultimate objective of education, here it is the one toward climate-friendly personality.
The proposals of how society should be organized in the future are reminiscent of the totalitarian police state in George Orwell's novel "1984". For Orwell it was a "Ministry of Truth," a "Junior Anti-Sex" and a "thought police". Similarly, the Environment wants the civil society is a "scientific expert community" set aside, which ensures that the company complies with the sustainability process. All laws are to a "comprehensive, mandatory climate impact assessment" through. The Parliament also is extended to a "future chamber" that "the interests of future generations" is responsible. This is not democratic, but to be filled, "for example, by drawing lots."
Obvious is a deep belief in internationalism. Thus, the nine professors mean by the "creative state" rather than the traditional nation state, but "global cooperation mechanisms," which explicitly on "institutions braid" orient the EU. A "guided political leadership" to enforce, should continue as a "UN Council for Sustainable Development", an "International Organization for Sustainable Energy", a "Global Commission on Sustainable Land Use" and a global organization, "sustainable urbanization" for to ensure compliance by nation states their "internationally verifiable Dekarbonisierungsfahrpläne." This will cost you big money: By 2030, it be a year between 200 billion and one trillion U.S. dollars, "the period from 2030 to 2050 actually much higher."
The "Great Transformation" of the German Environmental Council does not resemble in name only after the "Great Leap Forward." End of the 1950s wanted to modernize and industrialize the communist leadership of China under the title the country with a huge effort and. To achieve that, should the "revolutionary enthusiasm of the masses" to be mobilized. The Chinese leadership, summed up the country's population in communities. This lead-directly into the disaster. About thirty million people died of starvation in the coming years.
-----