Log in

View Full Version : IE9 beta available for download

longam
10-19-10, 06:43 PM
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/internet-explorer/products/ie-9/home

:cool:
FIREWALL
10-19-10, 06:51 PM
Read the Readme. The Geeks that always likes to Tweeks, will be in heaven.

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/internet-explorer/help/ie-9/is-the-internet-explorer-9-beta-right-for-me
antikristuseke
10-19-10, 07:35 PM
Id rather chew my own foot off.
FIREWALL
10-19-10, 11:27 PM
Id rather chew my own foot off.


Washed or Unwashed ? :DL
kiwi_2005
10-19-10, 11:39 PM
whats IE like when its been used for awhile, IE8 is speedy atm only cause ive just started using IE its a godsend compared to using FF for years. But will it bloat later on once I install add-blockers and the like. FF is 55mb in resources compare to IE thats using 2mb! I'm starting to like this browser again.
antikristuseke
10-19-10, 11:52 PM
Iv been using opera for years. Though I prefer 9 to 10.
Washed or Unwashed ? :DL

Irrelevant.
fred8615
10-20-10, 08:44 AM
Tried the IE9 Beta awhile back. Flash wouldn't work for me in it, but works fine in IE8. Even the 64 bit version. While I wasn't the only person reporting this, it does seem to be affecting only a few users.

Anyway, I'm not using it anymore, having gone back to IE8. I'll wait until the final version, where hopefully this'll be fixed, before installing again.

That said, I did like everything else in IE9.
AVGWarhawk
10-20-10, 11:33 AM
I have always used IE. Works ok for me and will probably do so in the future. I will wait for the offical release. Oh, I do use IE 64bit at home. I enjoy it. Seems very fast.
Castout
10-21-10, 04:50 AM
IE stands for Internet Expendable. Those who use it are . . .expendable

It's paying for its sin for killing Netscape Navigator.
Raptor1
10-21-10, 05:00 AM
IE stands for Internet Expendable. Those who use it are . . .expendable

It's paying for its sin for killing Netscape Navigator.

Wasn't that thing a piece of junk? I distinctly remember it was awfully slow even by the rather poor standards set by my 28kb/s modem...
Castout
10-21-10, 06:20 AM
Wasn't that thing a piece of junk? I distinctly remember it was awfully slow even by the rather poor standards set by my 28kb/s modem...

Was fine to me then. Kinda like it in fact. Don't remember anything about being slow then . . .