PDA

View Full Version : New wikileaks coming soon


Oberon
10-17-10, 07:19 PM
Now with added Iraq war documents:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11562494


The CIA really isn't what it used to be, is it? :hmmm:

CCIP
10-17-10, 07:29 PM
The CIA really isn't what it used to be, is it? :hmmm:

...or is it? :hmmm:

Personally, I've been rather suspicious of wikileaks for that exact reason.

Castout
10-17-10, 07:45 PM
Umm perhaps it was the CIA effort itself or part of the government which wants to put a justification to end the war in Iraq. Who knows.

Obviously these documents would serve to help to put an early US retirement from Iraq.

If something is too easy you can be sure it was made easy.

SteamWake
10-17-10, 08:50 PM
Now with added Iraq war documents:

Heh... sounds like a soap commercial.

the_tyrant
10-17-10, 09:02 PM
wikileaks, just an other goddamn hippie anti government site
personally, i think its run by the islamic equivalent of these guys:http://www.thejidf.org
hell, most of its files are fake as hell

TLAM Strike
10-17-10, 09:17 PM
That website seems to be down more than any other site I've been too... :yawn:

The CIA really isn't what it used to be, is it? :hmmm:

I'm just getting lazy thats all. :O:

ETR3(SS)
10-18-10, 12:35 AM
Umm perhaps it was the CIA effort itself or part of the government which wants to put a justification to end the war in Iraq. Who knows.

Obviously these documents would serve to help to put an early US retirement from Iraq.

If something is too easy you can be sure it was made easy.There are currently no combat troops in Iraq if I recall correctly. Just advisers.

Castout
10-18-10, 01:10 AM
wikileaks, just an other goddamn hippie anti government site
personally, i think its run by the islamic equivalent of these guys:http://www.thejidf.org
hell, most of its files are fake as hell

:shifty:

There are currently no combat troops in Iraq if I recall correctly. Just advisers.


There are just not engaged in combat or military/field operation I think.

joea
10-18-10, 03:07 AM
wikileaks, just an other goddamn hippie anti government site
personally, i think its run by the islamic equivalent of these guys:http://www.thejidf.org
hell, most of its files are fake as hell


How do you know this? What's wrong with being anti-government.

the_tyrant
10-18-10, 06:59 AM
How do you know this? What's wrong with being anti-government.

This is not a file from wikileaks, but a similar "leaking" website:

the original(translated by myself):
Therefore, we could disable large amount of illegal websites within a short period of time. This could drastically reduce the amount of illegal websites and illegal internet activities. Especially child p*rnography distribution. With cooperation from law enforcement agencies, internet pedophilia cases could be reduced by up to 90%.


the "leaked version"
Therefore, we could disable large amount of p*litically undesirable websites within a short period of time. This could drastically reduce the amount of p*litical activists on the internet, increasing ruling party support. With cooperation from law enforcement agencies, the number of p*litical d*ssenters could be reduced by up to 90%.

wow, just wow:nope:

Tribesman
10-18-10, 07:18 AM
wikileaks, just an other goddamn hippie anti government site
personally, i think its run by the islamic equivalent of these guys:http://www.thejidf.org
hell, most of its files are fake as hell

That makes no sense at all.
An islamic hippy anti government site like the one that supports the government???????

wow, just wow
So you are taking what you say is an article from a site which isn't the one in question, delivering your translations of versions which you claim it posted and altered then looping your version of some unrelated line from some unrelated site back to something it has nothing to do with:doh:

AdeptCharge
10-18-10, 07:43 AM
So you are taking what you say is an article from a site which isn't the one in question, delivering your translations of versions which you claim it posted and altered then looping your version of some unrelated line from some unrelated site back to something it has nothing to do with:doh: :DL

SteamWake
10-18-10, 07:45 AM
There are currently no combat troops in Iraq if I recall correctly. Just advisers.

:haha:

Armed and armored advisers.

Spin it as you want there is still conflict in the region and pepole are dying every day.

3 NATO troops die in Afghanistan as attacks surge

(AP) – 3 days ago

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Three NATO troops were killed Friday in Afghanistan in a surge of attacks that raised the death toll to 17 in three days for international troops in the country.


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jSVSQVBD4BnoHzibVJN9T4k96eAQ?docId=935a48e69 6a94af4866e1add60f7b493

nikimcbee
10-18-10, 01:16 PM
Heh... sounds like a soap commercial.

with restyn:D