WikiLeaks founder wanted for rape‎ [Archive]

Skybird

08-21-10, 07:18 AM

Walking on socks through London makes you an exccentric, but if he really raped somebody, then he would be an #######.

IF IT IS TRUE.

I have expected stories being raised that would link Assange to drugs. However, trying to damage him by linking him to rape also is a good choice if you want to damage him and pay back for his publications.

For Sweden it also could be an opportunity to "expel" a controversial figure (=keep away) whom to tolerate can only mean conflict with america. I think it was Sweden where a pirate-party gave Assange asylum for his servers within their party's official rooms, so that they cannot be raided by the police.

Currently we cannot say whether this is a dirty trick, or is true. but the guy has powerful enemies, that is for sure.

Tchocky

08-21-10, 07:24 AM

I think it was Sweden where a pirate-party gave Assange asylum for his servers within their party's official rooms, so that they cannot be raided by the police.
Yeah, last week the Pirate Party started hosting a good deal of Wikileaks, and as far as I know they cannot be raided.
Previously Wikilieaks main hosting was PRQ, and they were raided a few years back.

robbo180265

08-21-10, 08:33 AM

Haha, how quickly things have turned. Have to give the Agency credit for imagination.

This^

Can't wait to see what's leaked next - I forsee some juicy revenge leaks coming.

SteamWake

08-21-10, 08:34 AM

"Cant be raided" :har:

This is Chicago style politics your dealing with brother ;)

ETR3(SS)

08-21-10, 08:50 AM

What's the CIA doing? I mean come on, show some imagination here. CIA operative assassinates our good friend here, problem solved and no one knows who did it.:yeah::O:

mookiemookie

08-21-10, 09:39 AM

Well if the CIA can't get this to stick, there's always the pedophile angle. Just drop that story and let the "gotcha media" try him and convict him.

Hooray....freedom?

Gerald

08-21-10, 09:54 AM

has not to this to make sure what some believe, rather, depends on the internal leaks, which have made possible an arrest,if it is true or not, seems to be very unclear and this may well be a decoy for a purpose,as I see it, initially it is not enough information, but given the media likes to revel.

Jimbuna

08-21-10, 10:49 AM

I can't honestly say I'm suprised.....well just a little regarding the subject matter :DL

Oberon

08-21-10, 10:56 AM

Attempt failed:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11049316

August

08-21-10, 11:02 AM

Attempt failed:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11049316

Pretty weak ass "attempt" if you ask me. This is sounding more and more like a publicity stunt.

Gerald

08-21-10, 11:06 AM

for several reasons, what is the evidence? There are other actors involved in this mess,time will tell what happens...

Oberon

08-21-10, 11:23 AM

Gerald

08-21-10, 11:27 AM

I wonder if it'll be leaked on wikileaks.... :haha:

Yeah, I'm with August, if this is the best that certain agencies can do these days then they've fallen a long way in twenty years. Probably an inside job. and throughout history, classic symptoms

Jimbuna

08-21-10, 03:08 PM

SteamWake

08-21-10, 03:52 PM

Castout

08-21-10, 06:33 PM

What's the CIA doing? I mean come on, show some imagination here. CIA operative assassinates our good friend here, problem solved and no one knows who did it.:yeah::O:

Remember Dr Kelly? Everyone knows who did it . . .

My point is the man has garnered himself some recognition. He's high profile. Assassinating high profile person is always a messy business. Assassinating nobodies like us is a different matter entirely, from poison(chemical or viral) to hit and run with specially tuned car that would make no engine signature that would give it away as it sped to its target. No one would really know and the press won't even bother to publish anything.

Konovalov

08-21-10, 07:22 PM

Russians like to do radioactive material in a pot of tea over here in London. :hmmm:

Castout

08-21-10, 08:03 PM

Russians like to do radioactive material in a pot of tea over here in London. :hmmm:

Aye another fine example of high profile killing that has proven itself to be damaging to both its perpetrator's reputation and standing among international community.

Remember Arafat too?

The thing is how far can you justify this sort of killing?
and whether it was done for personal gain or state business or emergency.
State agency is not for personal gain.

TLAM Strike

08-21-10, 08:14 PM

Haha, how quickly things have turned. Have to give the Agency credit for imagination. Reminds me of an episode of that show from the early 2000s, "The Agency". They had an episode where they recruited a Marine who looked a lot like a terrorist leader in Indonesia to film a Porno movie to discredit him in the eyes of his fellow zealots. One of the characters says to another that this will not be the first time the CIA has done this to discredit an enemy of the US. The other guy says "Wait, the CIA made a porno? I've got to see this!" :DL

Yeah, last week the Pirate Party started hosting a good deal of Wikileaks, and as far as I know they cannot be raided.
Previously Wikilieaks main hosting was PRQ, and they were raided a few years back. Can't be raided? I'm sure the US Goverment has people for such operations. It would problay look something like this...
http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/3772/tomclancyssplintercellc.jpg

Castout

08-21-10, 09:11 PM

Reminds me of an episode of that show from the early 2000s, "The Agency". They had an episode where they recruited a Marine who looked a lot like a terrorist leader in Indonesia to film a Porno movie to discredit him in the eyes of his fellow zealots. One of the characters says to another that this will not be the first time the CIA has done this to discredit an enemy of the US. The other guy says "Wait, the CIA made a porno? I've got to see this!" :DL

That's nothing new :D. There's one with the ex president of Philippines too then still in office, I believe his name was Joseph Estrada. Looked just like him to me maybe it was him after all. . .

Zachstar

08-21-10, 11:09 PM

What frakking IDIOTS!

If someone at wikileaks freaked he or she could have leaked the key to unlock the "Insurance" file. With likely highly damaging info on many nations!

This obviously wasn't CIA doing. The head going down wont ruin wikileaks. It was some yahoo at another 2 bit agency or company that got exposed by wikileaks and wanted revenge. This kind of crap can start a international row!

The Third Man

08-21-10, 11:13 PM

Schadenfreude.

Jimbuna

08-22-10, 07:11 AM

Russians like to do radioactive material in a pot of tea over here in London. :hmmm:

Anyone remember the poison tipped umbrella?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/poison-umbrella-murder-case-is-reopened-851022.html

Capt. Morgan

08-23-10, 01:36 AM

Attempt failed:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11049316

Maybe not. Better to let a groundless charge hang in the air than give the accused an opportunity to vindicate himself in court.

Castout

08-23-10, 01:57 AM

Next thing you know Interpol will be after him for being responsible for global warming :DL

Because that would be next but Jim blew it up. Now they're looking for the possibility to link the man with Pakistan flood.

Ah sorry I forgot not to mention that one too:shifty:

Moeceefus

08-23-10, 02:20 AM

Maybe he'll move in with Polanski. :yawn:

darius359au

08-23-10, 04:46 AM

Here's a good tin foil hat theory which fits in well with assange's conspiracy theory's -He got one of his mates to anonymously make the accusations so he can go to the Swede's "See look ,I need protection from the evil 'insert country of choice here',Government"
Wikileak's started of as a good idea but when assange say's he doesn't give a rats if people die because of some of the stuff he puts up ,then he kinda loses the right to be thought of as a victim..

Capt. Morgan

08-23-10, 05:42 AM

...but when assange say's he doesn't give a rats if people die because of some of the stuff he puts up ,then he kinda loses the right to be thought of as a victim..

Sorry, I missed that statement. Where did he say that?

darius359au

08-23-10, 06:49 AM

Sorry, I missed that statement. Where did he say that?
basically he's saying its more important to him to to get the information out than the people's lives ,he does try to justife it by saying the informant's are acting in a "Criminal" way ,of course he's the one defining what's criminal.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/publication-of-afghan-informant-details-worth-the-risk-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange/story-e6frg6so-1225898273552

Capt. Morgan

08-23-10, 05:29 PM

basically he's saying its more important to him to to get the information out than the people's lives ,he does try to justife it by saying the informant's are acting in a "Criminal" way ,of course he's the one defining what's criminal.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/publication-of-afghan-informant-details-worth-the-risk-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange/story-e6frg6so-1225898273552

Thanks for that link.

While I count myself as a strong supporter of Wikileaks, It does seem ironic that a leading proponent of protecting anonymous whistle blowers would himself be responsible for publicly naming informants whom he deems to be criminal.

Re. your tin foil hat theory. A lame rape charge does take the spotlight away from some very bad judgement on Mr . Assanges' part.

Ducimus

08-23-10, 05:55 PM

I like to think that if one of our "agencies" were going to do something covert against that dillweed, it would be in the form of him having a tragic accident of some kind.

darius359au

09-01-10, 10:57 PM

Looks like the rape case is back on http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/02/world/europe/02wikileaks.html seems assage is one of these guys that doesn't understand that No means No - it may have started off as consensual but as soon as he refused to stop when asked to after the condoms broke it became rape ,or at least it does here in Australia - there's plenty of guys in jail here for doing the same thing!

I wonder if he's going to start jumping up and down on the spot and and go "How dare they ,they can't do that!" for this one http://www.wikileakileaks.org/ :03:

gimpy117

09-01-10, 11:35 PM

Honestly...leaking all those documents from the pentagon would make Langley very mad. So Id say theres a chance this was a setup. Hell I bet the CIA would even go as far to have an agent have sex with him and say it was rape! Of all the crazy ops the CIA has pulled this one would probably be a slam dunk!

Castout

09-02-10, 12:19 AM

Aye when the guy was at its max then the condom would break and used as an excuse which they guy would not heed lacking self constraint in those kind of situation especially if the women were like once in a life time lucky chance purposeful and trained sex bait . . . .:DL

kiwi_2005

09-02-10, 01:30 AM

I like to think that if one of our "agencies" were going to do something covert against that dillweed, it would be in the form of him having a tragic accident of some kind.

Having sex with one of the CIA whores is a tragic accident!

Catfish

09-02-10, 01:48 AM

Hello,

as always one should just observe, who gets the most advantages from a situation. Usually you know quickly what all is really about ...

The seeds of doubt fall on fertile ground, and even if he comes out officially, there will always be this shadow from the past.
Very much like propaganda works ..

I just wonder why Langley did not let him rape children, "finding" evidence behind a wall picture like a CD usually always works, and destroys a man more thoroughly.

What i do not understand why they do not just officially forbid the posting of militarily classified material. I mean the poulation will rather understand that, than this mud battle.

Greetings,
Catfish