PDA

View Full Version : How the Japanese Navy has fallen...


TLAM Strike
08-20-10, 08:56 PM
Oh dear... (http://www.informationdissemination.net/2010/08/friday-humor.html)

To think these were once the guys who bombed Pearl, conquered half the Pacific and and fought to the last man in the largest naval battle in modern history... :nope:

antikristuseke
08-20-10, 08:58 PM
Picture

<Dude what the **** you doin' man>

frau kaleun
08-20-10, 09:10 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwq1_9VH68&feature=fvw

Ducimus
08-20-10, 09:12 PM
Fella's, I think it's official. The Jap navy caught the gay.

Gerald
08-20-10, 09:48 PM
even if they need some moral support :yawn:

btw,Have none of you eaten any eggs today, I read that they withdraw at least 500 millones eggs, many pancakes

The Third Man
08-20-10, 10:04 PM
Do you know how nuclear capable the Japanese navy is?

ETR3(SS)
08-20-10, 10:09 PM
Japan is adamantly anti-nuclear. So it's safe to say they have no nuclear powered vessels.

The Third Man
08-20-10, 10:15 PM
Japan is adamantly anti-nuclear. So it's safe to say they have no nuclear powered vessels.


I have to agree, they have no nuclear powered vessels. But it doesn't mean the Japanese aren't nuclear capable.

ETR3(SS)
08-20-10, 10:19 PM
Well they do have 55 reactors for power throughout the country. Funny though as they get pissy whenever one of our nuc boats docks in their country.:hmmm:

Castout
08-20-10, 10:22 PM
War is terrible and when u engage in one you better fight to win and nothing less.

Japan went to war with excessive pride and spread her err everywhere in Asia. It was not just military invasion but also conquest of religions and cultures.

. . . and they lost the war . . .and paid a heavy price for it.

Much of the same thing happened to Germany which is quite anti militarism.

They've learned a lesson. They both had been subdued militarily.

I suspect they both will forget about them soon enough with newer generations having no experience of the terrible war.

Power and constraint(control) MUST go together. US has survived because they've exercised constraint over their power. Had they went by way of Germany and Japan did during second world war post 1945 they too would've been defeated. I'm sure of that. Deterrence is better than fighting.

Gerald
08-20-10, 10:27 PM
Well they do have 55 reactors for power throughout the country. Funny though as they get pissy whenever one of our nuc boats docks in their country.:hmmm: the right to deny boarding to other countries naval nuke ship,there are plenty of them,even if they have power plant,double moral!

ETR3(SS)
08-20-10, 10:33 PM
Yeah, Italy is another one of those. Although last I knew they didn't have any reactors built, but they were looking into it.

Jimbuna
08-21-10, 01:51 AM
War is terrible and when u engage in one you better fight to win and nothing less.

Japan went to war with excessive pride and spread her err everywhere in Asia. It was not just military invasion but also conquest of religions and cultures.

. . . and they lost the war . . .and paid a heavy price for it.

Much of the same thing happened to Germany which is quite anti militarism.

They've learned a lesson. They both had been subdued militarily.

I suspect they both will forget about them soon enough with newer generations having no experience of the terrible war.

Power and constraint(control) MUST go together. US has survived because they've exercised constraint over their power. Had they went by way of Germany and Japan did during second world war post 1945 they too would've been defeated. I'm sure of that. Deterrence is better than fighting.

Good points :yep:

Tribesman
08-21-10, 03:23 AM
Yeah, Italy is another one of those. Although last I knew they didn't have any reactors built, but they were looking into it.

Italy used to have about half a dozen reactors, but they shut the power station reactors down years ago and only retained the research reactors in operation.

ETR3(SS)
08-21-10, 08:52 AM
Italy used to have about half a dozen reactors, but they shut the power station reactors down years ago and only retained the research reactors in operation.Didn't know that, thanks for the info.:salute:

MGR1
08-21-10, 05:08 PM
The Village People have a lot to answer for.....:o

Mike.

TLAM Strike
08-21-10, 07:31 PM
Do you know how nuclear capable the Japanese navy is? Japan has been discribed as a "Turn Key" nuclear power, in other words they have the technology and know how to go nuclear (ships and bombs) but chose not to. Their ships and planes could easily carry our nuclear bombs if necessary.

Yeah, Italy is another one of those. Although last I knew they didn't have any reactors built, but they were looking into it. New Zealand also forbids any ship with a nuclear reactor or capable of carrying nuclear weapons from entering its waters. Some cities in Canada (Vancouver I think) do as well.

ETR3(SS)
08-21-10, 07:46 PM
New Zealand also forbids any ship with a nuclear reactor or capable of carrying nuclear weapons from entering its waters. Some cities in Canada (Vancouver I think) do as well.I wish I still had the picture I got from Vancouver. There is a no **** sign there that says "Vancouver is a nuclear weapons free zone." I couldn't believe it when I saw it.

Edit: here's a pic of it I found on the net.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2786368137_1f88ff4f02.jpg?v=0

Task Force
08-21-10, 07:59 PM
wow... yea, the japanease... all I have to say SEAMAN SHIP SEAMAN SHIP!!!:rotfl2: