Don't you just love Pravda

[XabbaRus]

Hell this is great..

http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12190_experiment.html

Ranks up there with my father-in law's idea that the Russian wildfires are a result of some American weather changing experiments....

[Oberon]

I wonder if anyone would notice if time was changed... :hmmm:

I'm surprised that Chavez hasn't blamed the Asian floods on HAARP yet. :hmmm:

[Gerald]

but the contents of the article are a bit up to the viewer to interpret :roll:

[CptSimFreak]

Pravda is the same thing as enquirer this days.

[AVGWarhawk]

Ranks up there with my father-in law's idea that the Russian wildfires are a result of some American weather changing experiments....


He is right.......

[TLAM Strike]

The actual method for traveling back in time is far cooler, you take two colliding black holes and fly around them in figure 8s inside their gravitational fields. The massive distortions in space-time will apparently slowly send you back in time... :hmmm:

[Gerald]

The actual method for traveling back in time is far cooler, you take two colliding black holes and fly around them in figure 8s inside their gravitational fields. The massive distortions in space-time will apparently slowly send you back in time... :hmmm: but in what time we're talking about :hmm2:

[TLAM Strike]

but in what time we're talking about :hmm2: Depends on velocity. Time is relative to the observer. I imagine that its possible to fly really fast though such a construct and if you plotted it right fly back in time the exact amount you travel forwards relative to the outside universe and thus travel in time at a 1:1 ratio.

Let Neil DeGrasse Tyson explain it. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAD25s53wmE) Fast forward to about 45:00

[ETR3(SS)]

So did anybody else think of Red Alert and the Chronosphere when they read that?:haha:

[Raptor1]

So did anybody else think of Red Alert and the Chronosphere when they read that?:haha:

Yes, in fact.

[Gerald]

Depends on velocity. Time is relative to the observer. I imagine that its possible to fly really fast though such a construct and if you plotted it right fly back in time the exact amount you travel forwards relative to the outside universe and thus travel in time at a 1:1 ratio.

Let Neil DeGrasse Tyson explain it. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAD25s53wmE) Fast forward to about 45:00 which speeds can move about, in theory :roll:

[Gerald]

So did anybody else think of Red Alert and the Chronosphere when they read that?:haha: I played a lot when it first came out,and the rest for that matter also,but it was a fun thing,but today you have a huge range of similar games....

[nikimcbee]

Is this still considered a serious paper? It reads like the weekly world news at times.:haha:

[Raptor1]

Is this still considered a serious paper? It reads like the weekly world news at times.:haha:

When was Pravda considered a serious paper? :hmmm:

[Susexx]

She is such I the truth, as well as some which Russian prostitutes all name spies. Do not read rags, there delirium write.

[Platapus]

Pravda? I think their shoes are ugly.






:D

[frau kaleun]

Pravda? I think their shoes are ugly.






:D

I have to admit when I first saw the thread I read the title as "Don't you just love Prada" and thought, well, there's something you don't see at Subsim everyday.

I was about to start my own thread about Project Runway but fortunately I discovered my error just in time. :O:

[Weiss Pinguin]

Ranks up there with my father-in law's idea that the Russian wildfires are a result of some American weather changing experiments....
Obviously it was women in skimpy clothing.

[antikristuseke]

When was Pravda considered a serious paper? :hmmm:

Since the dawn of time.