View Full Version : Are There Any Engineers Here Familiar With CBM Docking Rings?
krashkart
06-23-10, 07:24 PM
CBM - Common Berthing Mechanism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Berthing_Mechanism
I'm trying to figure out how realistic it would be to throw 80kN (or more) of thrust into a space station that uses these to mate all of its modules together. I don't have a very good understanding of material strengths, and certainly no idea how strong the CBM components are. How well would they take compressive loads (for modules that are connected along the longitudinal axis of the station), and how well would they take shearing(?) loads (for modules connected either vertically or laterally to the station)? :06:
This isn't for any kind of assignment or work detail (thankfully, I'd be on the D-list for sure), it is just a hobby of mine.
nikimcbee
06-23-10, 07:33 PM
Are you sure you're not thinking of of this CBM
Common Birthing Mechanism?
http://images.teamsugar.com/files/users/1/12981/20_2007/stirrups.JPG
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:har:
nikimcbee
06-23-10, 07:37 PM
a space station
That's no CBM...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVekNsgUqn4&feature=related
look out!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piVnArp9ZE0&feature=related
TLAM Strike
06-23-10, 08:13 PM
If compression tolerance is the problem perhaps you are going about it backwards. Instead of docking the modules before launch tie them in train (with some sort of high strength cable with a series of baskets for each module) and pull them in to a higher orbit with a tug.
Of course there is nothing preventing you from doing a longer low powered burn, it doesn't matter how much thrust you use to get your final Delta V, you will get there eventually since the length of burn adds to it just as much as each kN of additional thrust would add to it.
krashkart
06-23-10, 08:34 PM
I'm all for multiple low-power burns, in fact that would probably be the most intelligent thing to do. I have succeeded in boosting to a higher orbit from LEO with a total 120kN thrust, but it was all done in the Orbiter simulator which doesn't account for stresses to the vehicle being pushed. So, that's where I have to really start thinking about what I'm doing in there. (hence this thread :har:)
The thing of it is, I'm actually thinking of trying to send something the size of the ISS to the moon and back using that simulator. What I've put together so far is balanced well enough that I can dock four thrusters to it (each one puts out 40kN main thrust), fire them all at full power and still maintain prograde orientation. The problem in my mind is, when I try to put this thing into a trans-lunar injection I will need all of that power. Will the station hold together, or will it tear apart? If anything goes it would be the weakest link in the chain; the CBM ports that hold it all together.
TLAM Strike
06-23-10, 08:54 PM
I figured you were using Orbiter. ;)
I honestly don't know the tolerances of the component in question. As a point of reference... in fact the only point of reference I can think of for what you are doing would be the Apollo CSM. Its maximum main engine thrust was 91,000 N of thrust (or 91kN) and it was capable of using that thrust while docked to the LEM.
So I think it is feasible as far as compression goes, shear I have no clue since Apollo was stacked in a strait line not and L or + shape.
Must resist urge to download Orbiter again... must work on LWAMI 3.11...
krashkart
06-23-10, 09:27 PM
Yeah, Buster! :stare: You work on LWAMI and I'll work on putting a new crater on the moon. Mmmkay? :O:
EDIT: Looking forward to the new LWAMI, btw. I haven't played DW in ages and if memory serves me right I had installed one of the first releases then.
NeonSamurai
06-24-10, 12:59 AM
Honestly I don't think that would be very realistic, torsion forces plus imbalanced thrust (cause 4 rockets will not fire perfectly equal) would most likely rip it to pieces, and I don't think they are designed to take that kind of strain to begin with. The LEM on the other hand was designed to land on the moon (and could easily support the thrust from the CM).
A more realistic scenario would be to boost parts into orbit, possibly partially assemble into larger sections, then boost to lunar orbit and assemble.
krashkart
06-24-10, 02:22 AM
That's what I was afraid of. I kept getting mental pictures of the docking adapters tearing out and the rest of the assembly disintegrating. I'll try it anyway just to see if I can send the whole assembly out and back. :smug:
TLAM Strike
06-24-10, 08:40 AM
EDIT: Looking forward to the new LWAMI, btw. I haven't played DW in ages and if memory serves me right I had installed one of the first releases then.
You know we just released the new version 3.10 right? :06:
Weiss Pinguin
06-24-10, 09:10 AM
You know we just released the new version 3.10 right? :06:
Krashkart is never satisfied :smug:
All this talk of space construction makes me want to fire up Orbiter and... Must resist! Must finish playthrough of Civ 4!
krashkart
06-24-10, 10:19 AM
You know we just released the new version 3.10 right? :06:
Oh yeah, I was aware of that a few days ago, TLAM. I haven't migrated DW to my laptop yet (it's a netbook, so I'll have to copy the install files over LAN the next time I fire up the desktop). Did I bork something in my post again? *scroll scroll*
Oh I see it now. Ha! Sorry about that. :haha:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.