View Full Version : Dragunov manual
SUBMAN1
06-06-09, 02:34 PM
http://www.ar15.com/content/manuals/dragunov.pdf
Kind of a cool owners manual per say.
-S
OneToughHerring
06-06-09, 02:50 PM
Yea, and it's a cool looking rifle too. I never got to shoot with it but others did. It's ok as a sniper rifle, the variants our military has aren't as accurate as some of the newer variants though. Or so I was told by the guys who shot with it.
The bayonet should be spring operated, like a harpoon.
nikimcbee
06-07-09, 09:46 AM
http://www.ar15.com/content/manuals/dragunov.pdf
Kind of a cool owners manual per say.
-S
Neat! I don't know that much about that rifle. I heard it wasn't that great, but then again, I don't know.:D
CastleBravo
06-07-09, 10:27 AM
I like this one.......... Barrett M468
http://www.depot53.com/news/Barrett%20M468-1%20lg.jpg
Dimitrius07
06-07-09, 10:54 AM
I like this one.......... Barrett M468
http://www.depot53.com/news/Barrett%20M468-1%20lg.jpg
Well it have a same mechanism as M16. I do hope its more realible that M16 itself :DL. Sorry if i iffend anyone with thise message ;)
CastleBravo
06-07-09, 11:10 AM
Well it have a same mechanism as M16. I do hope its more realible that M16 itself :DL. Sorry if i iffend anyone with thise message ;)
No offense. I like the fact that you can purchase the upper by itsself and slap it on the M-16/AR-15 lower. The 4.68mm round is larger than the 5.56mm(.223 REM) and smaller than the 7.76mm(.308), which makes for a nice mix.
Since the firearm laws are based on the lower, its all good. Sorry if I offend anyone with this message.
What's the MP5 like as a weapon? I've always had a liking for it, but never handled one, handled an SA-80 once at an airshow, deact of course and chained to a board :haha: but it was a lot lighter than I was expecting it to be and the scope was very nice too.
breadcatcher101
06-07-09, 12:05 PM
MP5's are great SMG's, well balanced. Kind of a pain to clean with the chamber but as long as you keep it in clean shape they are very dependable.
I am an Uzi guy myself.
CastleBravo
06-07-09, 12:07 PM
What's the MP5 like as a weapon? I've always had a liking for it, but never handled one, handled an SA-80 once at an airshow, deact of course and chained to a board :haha: but it was a lot lighter than I was expecting it to be and the scope was very nice too.
As a CQC weapon it is excellent. Not as much muzzle rise as the M16, AK47, and the over all stopping power which is expected from a .45 cal. Accuracy isn't the greatest but in the CQC scenerio it isn't important. It is a spray and pray weapon.
antikristuseke
06-07-09, 12:36 PM
A .45 MP5? I have a feeling you are mixing it up with the HK UMP which is available in .45, but IIRC the MP5 is only available in 9x19mm, 10x25mm and .40S&W.
CastleBravo
06-07-09, 12:40 PM
A .45 MP5? I have a feeling you are mixing it up with the HK UMP which is available in .45, but IIRC the MP5 is only available in 9x19mm, 10x25mm and .40S&W.
UR correct my mistake. It just now came to me.
talesofvalor
06-07-09, 01:37 PM
I like this one .................... I think you should know what it is.
http://files.sharenator.com/m1carbine_pfc_modelgun_wwii-s480x360-14501-580.jpg
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:AK-47_type_II_Part_DM-ST-89-01131.jpg
CastleBravo
06-07-09, 01:46 PM
Begins with an 'M'?:)
Ends with a '4'?:DL
A one in the middle? :D
breadcatcher101
06-07-09, 01:54 PM
Oh yes, an M1 carbine. Some had full-auto with the wooden stock, others had a folding stock which was very unstable. Nice little carbines, good out to 200 yards or so. Very fast rate of fire, hard to really hold on target, at least for me.
Raptor1
06-07-09, 02:00 PM
Wasn't the full-auto one called the M2 Carbine?
Begins with an 'M'?:)
Ends with a '4'?:DL
A one in the middle? :D
nope:O:
M1 carbine
M14 is quite a bit bigger
CastleBravo
06-07-09, 02:28 PM
nope:O:
M1 carbine
M14 is quite a bit bigger
Please don't confuse my answers with the facts..........:O: :DL
Sledgehammer427
06-07-09, 02:39 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/M107_1.gif
got to shoot one of these, Barrett M107, nasty recoil, but it has a range of 1600 yards+
and i managed to hit my target 6 times at 700, all killshots :D
Ah, the Garand :yeah: I like the original
Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang PING!
Raptor1
06-07-09, 03:00 PM
Ah, the Garand :yeah: I like the original
Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang PING!
Garand? I see no Garand...
The M1891 Mosin-Nagant is obviously the superior rifle!
Dimitrius07
06-07-09, 03:01 PM
No offense. I like the fact that you can purchase the upper by itsself and slap it on the M-16/AR-15 lower. The 4.68mm round is larger than the 5.56mm(.223 REM) and smaller than the 7.76mm(.308), which makes for a nice mix.
Since the firearm laws are based on the lower, its all good.
Thanks for the better explanation.
Sorry if I offend anyone with this message.
Failed on cheking before posting, have a nice day mister.:salute:
antikristuseke
06-07-09, 03:42 PM
Garand? I see no Garand...
The M1891 Mosin-Nagant is obviously the superior rifle!
Bah, the K98k is obviously superior to that.
Sledgehammer427
06-07-09, 04:35 PM
1903 Springfield!
Raptor1
06-07-09, 04:46 PM
Pfft, you people have no understanding of the people's rifle of revolution... :O:
:woot:
Winchester Model 1866!! :salute:
Steel_Tomb
06-08-09, 12:54 PM
I love the Barrett .50, imagine that in the desert your Taliban buddies head goes pop and you don't hear the shot for a couple seconds more must be terrifying.
OneToughHerring
06-08-09, 01:06 PM
I love the Barrett .50, imagine that in the desert your Taliban buddies head goes pop and you don't hear the shot for a couple seconds more must be terrifying.
Certain irony in that the Talibans are using Lee-Enfields against the coalition, or whatever that bunch of nations presently in Afghanistan calls itself.
http://www.newmajority.com/ShowScroll.aspx?ID=29a55f8c-2268-4f15-91a8-6893868692f3
Me, if I would go to a hostile planet I would like to have the RK, the Finnish variant of the AK.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.