PortsmouthProwler
05-15-09, 04:20 PM
It seems to me that in SH 1 and SH3 salvoes were easier. The dial here in 4 confuses me.
* The dial seems counterintuitive. The LH side is labelled RIGHT and vice versa. So, if I want a spread to the RIGHT (i. e., target's AOB is Starboard, thus travelling from left to right 'cross the scope), I twist Clockwise, ne c'est pas? This would produce:
Torp1 - x degrees - Torp2 - x degrees - Torp3 - ...
correct?
The other way round (LEFT) is to twist CCW, set the increment angle and produce:
... - Torp3 - x degrees - Torp2 - x degrees - Torp1
if I'm understanding this instrument correctly.
Incidentally, IIRC, a one (1) degree spread produces a linear difference of 17 yards at a range of 1,000 yards. IOW, long shots should be no more than one degree. I rarely go more than 2.5 for closer; reading US Sub Ops and other sources, it seems like 1.5 to 2.5 was very typical.
* The dial seems counterintuitive. The LH side is labelled RIGHT and vice versa. So, if I want a spread to the RIGHT (i. e., target's AOB is Starboard, thus travelling from left to right 'cross the scope), I twist Clockwise, ne c'est pas? This would produce:
Torp1 - x degrees - Torp2 - x degrees - Torp3 - ...
correct?
The other way round (LEFT) is to twist CCW, set the increment angle and produce:
... - Torp3 - x degrees - Torp2 - x degrees - Torp1
if I'm understanding this instrument correctly.
Incidentally, IIRC, a one (1) degree spread produces a linear difference of 17 yards at a range of 1,000 yards. IOW, long shots should be no more than one degree. I rarely go more than 2.5 for closer; reading US Sub Ops and other sources, it seems like 1.5 to 2.5 was very typical.