Log in

View Full Version : Is not moving a satellite when it could cause a collision terrorism?


XabbaRus
02-22-09, 03:58 PM
According to this person it is...

http://larussophobe.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/editorial-russias-space-terrorism/

That is desperation...

Digital_Trucker
02-22-09, 04:10 PM
That person needs some serious psychiatric help:nope: Unless the Russians moved the satellite sometime shortly before the collision (which I don't believe they did), there's no way they could have known years ago that it was going to collide with anything.

I still haven't seen anything about whether the satellite was even capable of maneuvering. Guess I need to look around again on that one.

Platapus
02-22-09, 04:15 PM
I suppose it all depends on the definition of terrorism for this individual.

I don't see it as terrorism, more like criminal negligence. :stare:

Even if it could be proved that the Russians targeted the Iridium satellite, I don't think it would qualify as a terrorist attack.

I don't know if Cosmos 2251 was capable of being deorbited either at its EOL or at the time of the collision.

In any case, perhaps it was better that the Russians did NOT deorbit Cosmos 2251

Deorbiting Russian satellite nearly knocks out jetliner
http://fortsanders.net/node/15

DOH! :har:

baggygreen
02-22-09, 04:16 PM
Great way to start the working morning Xabba, thanks mate

It isnt terror, thats some major anti-russkie BS right there.

What it does do is help highlight a valid point though. When your satellite carks it, it should be made mandatory that it be brought out of orbit to burn up on reentry. How difficult would that be? Not very, nothing but simple trig. That would solve an issue with the amount of junk up there, especially considering in the next couple of hundred years there will be much much more going up there

Torplexed
02-22-09, 04:26 PM
The idea that this was a deliberate act is unlikely in the extreme. The old Russian satellite died well over 10 years ago. Since it was dead, there was no way it could be controlled, so how could it possibly be blamed for causing the collision? Unless someone wants to argue it was a sleeper satellite. :roll:

In terms of timing, this would require millisecond accuracy to cause an impact. Had either satellite arrived at the impact location even a millisecond early or late, they would've missed each other by several meters. That's a level of accuracy that's extremely hard to achieve.

In terms of producing debris, this impact was about as bad as you can get. The energy involved was amazing. It might take weeks or even months to catalog all of the pieces. I don't see any rational reason for a nation as large as Russia to screw up their own badly needed communication satellites with junk in space.

CaptainHaplo
02-22-09, 04:26 PM
The russian satellite was not controllable. They had lost any response from it along time back.

Its not like you can just send it a signal to de-orbit. The only thing you COULD safely do is program in a timer that says if you dont get X recieved within Y period - thrust in direction Z for a specified time, breaking orbit AWAY from earth.

The problem there - these things are man made - no telling its going to get all the logic checks right and go in the right direction - or maybe it screws up and somebody misses a decimal point - now it decided to deorbit after 48 seconds vs 48 hours... oops....

You can't guarantee a machine is going to work 100% of the time. They break - on earth as well as above it.

Digital_Trucker
02-22-09, 04:41 PM
In terms of producing debris, this impact was about as bad as you can get. The energy involved was amazing. It might take weeks or even months to catalog all of the pieces. I don't see any rational reason for a nation as large as Russia to screw up their own badly needed communication satellites with junk in space.
Evidently, it doesn't bother the Chinese to do the same thing (on a smaller scale) http://www.space.com/news/070202_china_spacedebris.html

Torplexed
02-22-09, 04:59 PM
In terms of producing debris, this impact was about as bad as you can get. The energy involved was amazing. It might take weeks or even months to catalog all of the pieces. I don't see any rational reason for a nation as large as Russia to screw up their own badly needed communication satellites with junk in space.
Evidently, it doesn't bother the Chinese to do the same thing (on a smaller scale) http://www.space.com/news/070202_china_spacedebris.html

Good point. Debris from the Chinese ASAT test jeopardizes the three dozen or more operational satellites China has in orbit, and will endanger the crews of future Shenzhou spaceflights as well. The ironic part is that China has since accepted U.S. tracking data on potential debris threats to the Shenzhou missions.

They mess up space and then we help them navigate the mess. Go figure.:doh:

XabbaRus
02-22-09, 05:02 PM
For anti-Russian BS that site is the best for a laugh.

I'm used to her/it/they writing some outrageous stuff on that site but that made me make a double take.

sure there are things the Russians do that aren't kosher but for some reason La Russophobe really has a stick in her behind about them.

Digital_Trucker
02-22-09, 06:13 PM
Go figure.:doh:

That feat is quite impossible when it comes to humans. They just aren't logical (key segway to Kapitan Phillips vulcan admonishments:DL).

joegrundman
02-22-09, 07:07 PM
Go figure.:doh:
That feat is quite impossible when it comes to humans. They just aren't logical (key segway to Kapitan Phillips vulcan admonishments:DL).

what does "key segway" mean?

baggygreen
02-22-09, 07:18 PM
Go figure.:doh:
That feat is quite impossible when it comes to humans. They just aren't logical (key segway to Kapitan Phillips vulcan admonishments:DL).

what does "key segway" mean?I think he meant "cue" not key :DL

joegrundman
02-22-09, 08:08 PM
Aah, cue segway!

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/204/segwaybabystroller.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/segwaybabystroller.jpg/1/w500.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img25/segwaybabystroller.jpg/1/)

Digital_Trucker
02-22-09, 09:43 PM
Yeah, sorry guys, the old brain doesn't work the way it used to. It did work once upon a time, I think, didn't it?:oops: Maybe I meant press the key to cue the segway. Yeah, that's the ticket.

baggygreen
02-22-09, 10:34 PM
No worries DT

By the way, did you mean segway or segue?:know:




All's good mate, just joshing you

Digital_Trucker
02-23-09, 11:52 AM
No worries DT

By the way, did you mean segway or segue?:know:




All's good mate, just joshing you
Yeah, theatrical terms and I don't get along, so I just spell them phonetically. I know at least one person knew what I meant (not counting me, of course).:DL

antikristuseke
02-23-09, 12:06 PM
Yeah, sorry guys, the old brain doesn't work the way it used to. It did work once upon a time, I think, didn't it?:oops: Maybe I meant press the key to cue the segway. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Dont worry, My memory is worse than i remembered allso.:haha:

Platapus
02-23-09, 09:59 PM
They say the memory is the second thing to go....