Log in

View Full Version : How many SH3 forum members does it take?


GoldenRivet
07-12-08, 01:37 PM
How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?


1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:

von hally
07-12-08, 01:57 PM
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:



lol:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

UnderseaLcpl
07-12-08, 02:07 PM
LOL!

This is totally untrue. I can easily cover 5 or 6 of those roles.:D

KeptinCranky
07-12-08, 02:12 PM
Sure, but can you do so in a single post?.... :hmm:

:rotfl:

Jimbuna
07-12-08, 02:14 PM
Nice one http://www.psionguild.org/forums/images/smilies/wolfsmilies/thumbsup.gif

Mikhayl
07-12-08, 02:24 PM
How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?


1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:

Great one.

:lol:

STEED
07-12-08, 03:16 PM
That Is So..............................................

STEED
07-12-08, 03:17 PM
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Mush Martin
07-12-08, 03:19 PM
:rotfl:

Sailor Steve
07-12-08, 05:20 PM
How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?


1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:

Great one.

:lol:
Me too.
:rotfl:

Jimbuna
07-12-08, 05:50 PM
I think you meant "me three" ;)

Pisces
07-12-08, 05:55 PM
He forgot the dozen or so that complain they can't see the damned freighter because it's too dark at night.

Which reminds me... I need to change a lightbulb ;)

KeptinCranky
07-12-08, 06:00 PM
:lol:

Good one Pisces, very true :up:

TarJak
07-12-08, 06:24 PM
Funny stuff.:lol:

FIREWALL
07-12-08, 07:08 PM
Thx GoldeRivet :up:

I needed a good laugh after the way today went. :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Frank0001
07-12-08, 07:23 PM
Aaahahahaha coffee all over my keyboard now :rotfl: :rotfl:

That was hilarious!

By the way, what's the best way to sink a Liberty cargo?

GoldenRivet
07-12-08, 07:25 PM
Thx GoldeRivet :up:

I needed a good laugh after the way today went. :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

not a problem... modified version of the lightbulb thing but i thought it would be a good post :up:

Laufen zum Ziel
07-12-08, 09:11 PM
http://s262.photobucket.com/albums/ii113/laufen345/th_thDontannoy.gif

Sailor Steve
07-12-08, 09:34 PM
I think you meant "me three" ;)
I was taking a crack at Mikhayl over #13.

And no, you don't think.:p

@ GR: it was a great conversion.

Jimbuna
07-13-08, 07:05 AM
I think you meant "me three" ;)
I was taking a crack at Mikhayl over #13.

And no, you don't think.:p

@ GR: it was a great conversion.

http://imgcash3.imageshack.us/img412/4774/thumbsuplargeon1.gif http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/forum/images/smilies/13523300456.gif

nikimcbee
07-13-08, 07:36 AM
That Is So..............................................

is ond so don't need to be cpaitalized.

Reise
07-13-08, 07:43 AM
That Is So..............................................

is ond so don't need to be cpaitalized.

ond and cpaitalized need to be spelled right

:rotfl:

Frank0001
07-13-08, 08:47 AM
You forgot to add a dot after your sentence. :up:

Okay, that were the three spellcheckers, we can now continue to discuss wether it's 'freighter' or 'frachter'. :rotfl:

nikimcbee
07-13-08, 09:19 AM
That Is So..............................................

is ond so don't need to be cpaitalized.

ond and cpaitalized need to be spelled right

:rotfl:

Ja, I have over 60 books on the Englisch language, I suggest that you look at one!
Here!

Harumph!

Sailor Steve
07-13-08, 10:04 AM
@ Reise and Frank0001: you might want to take a good look at McBee's picture, and remember the old adage about "new tricks". I've known that old dog for awhile now, and he don't roll over for nobody.:rotfl:

Reise
07-13-08, 10:05 AM
Here!


Wo ist es dann ?
:rotfl:

Reise
07-13-08, 10:08 AM
@ Reise and Frank0001: you might want to take a good look at McBee's picture, and remember the old adage about "new tricks". I've known that old dog for awhile now, and he don't roll over for nobody.:rotfl:

I was


7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames


Haha

Sailor Steve
07-13-08, 10:12 AM
I thought so. I was just joking back. McBee needs all the help he can get.

Brag
07-13-08, 02:24 PM
Me too!

(oops, forgot to place original quote) :roll:

GoldenRivet
07-13-08, 02:32 PM
Brag how ya been holding up guy?

How is kingmaker going?

Sailor Steve
07-13-08, 02:51 PM
And how many Subsim forum members does it take to write a book?

Biggles
07-13-08, 03:41 PM
How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?


1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:

Great one.

:lol:
Me too.
:rotfl:

Totally agree:lol:

(and the award for the most boring and obvious joke goes to....)

GoldenRivet
07-13-08, 03:41 PM
And how many Subsim forum members does it take to write a book?

1 to write the book and to post that the book was written

14 to share similar experiences of trying to write books and how the book might have been written differently

7 to discuss the difficulty of getting the book published

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the book

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's fictional or autobiographical

2 poets to discuss endlessly how the book represents the morning, noon and evening of a mans natural life cycle

15 know-it-alls who claim they are accomplished writers to explain that they helped contribute to the book

19 to post that this forum is not about books and should be taken to the entertainment section

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all read books at some point or another so it doesnt matter where this thread is posted

36 to debate whether the third person or first person should have been used in the book

7 to post URL's where one can purchase the book

4 to post that the book should be purchased through the forum website to help support the site!

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "good read"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say read the book before contributing opinions about the book please!

and finally

1 forum lurker to hijack the ship sinking thread and turn it into a book thread

UnderseaLcpl
07-13-08, 04:10 PM
You forgot; one Undersealcpl to muck everything up and treat his reply as a graduate thesis.

Frank0001
07-13-08, 05:39 PM
And how many Subsim forum members does it take to write a book?

1 to write the book and to post that the book was written

14 to share similar experiences of trying to write books and how the book might have been written differently

7 to discuss the difficulty of getting the book published

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the book

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's fictional or autobiographical

2 poets to discuss endlessly how the book represents the morning, noon and evening of a mans natural life cycle

15 know-it-alls who claim they are accomplished writers to explain that they helped contribute to the book

19 to post that this forum is not about books and should be taken to the entertainment section

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all read books at some point or another so it doesnt matter where this thread is posted

36 to debate whether the third person or first person should have been used in the book

7 to post URL's where one can purchase the book

4 to post that the book should be purchased through the forum website to help support the site!

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "good read"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say read the book before contributing opinions about the book please!

and finally

1 forum lurker to hijack the ship sinking thread and turn it into a book thread

Gasp! That was hilarious!! :rotfl: :rotfl: Good read :up:

bert8for3
07-13-08, 05:51 PM
:rotfl: :rotfl: . But I gotta go 'cause I can't handle the controversy :rotfl:

onelifecrisis
07-13-08, 07:29 PM
How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?


1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:

Great one.

:lol:
Me too.
:rotfl:

Totally agree:lol:

(and the award for the most boring and obvious joke goes to....)

...who? :hmm:

GoldenRivet
07-13-08, 07:40 PM
How many SH3 forum members does it takes to sink a freighter?


1 to sink the freighter and to post that the freighter has been sunk

14 to share similar experiences of sinking freighters and how the freighter could have been sunk differently

7 to caution about the dangers of attacking such freighters in various years of the war

7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in the original post about sinking the freighter

5 to flame the spell checkers

3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

6 to argue over whether it's "freighter" or "frachter" ... another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

2 old salty navy retirees to inform the group that the proper term is "Liberty Ship"

15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the Merchant Marines, and that "liberty ship" is NOT correct... it was a "victory cargo"

19 to post that this forum is not about "Ship classes" and to please take this discussion to the general discussion forum

11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all encounter freighters in SH3 and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

36 to debate which method of attacking freighters is superior, where to aim for the best results, what pistol type works best for the given type of freighter and what method of approach is best

7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different freighters

4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's

13 to quote the longest post in its entirety including all headers and signatures, and add something like the phrase "Me too"

5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the controversy

4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

13 to say "read the GWX manual before posting questions about sinking freighters in GWX"

and finally

1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 18 months from now and start it all over again.


:rotfl:
Great one.

:lol: Me too.
:rotfl:
Totally agree:lol:

(and the award for the most boring and obvious joke goes to....)
...who? :hmm:

...what?

onelifecrisis
07-13-08, 07:45 PM
Must... resist... quote... button...

Sailor Steve
07-13-08, 08:05 PM
Must... resist... quote... button...
...why?

_Seth_
07-13-08, 09:08 PM
:rotfl::rotfl:Ths is just.....weird:lol::lol: ROFL!

*Ok, im finished laughing...i think...
now..i...must...close...this...thread....now..
...before..someone...starts..a...quote...rally...*
Done! :up: