Windows XP SP3 and Vista's new Service Pack 1 benchmark tests

[SUBMAN1]

Vista w/ SP1 still slow - latest benchmarks put XP w/ SP3 at 2x the performance.

I already knew this, but figured SP1 for Vista would be an improvement, but I guess I can keep waiting. My desktop is going to be sluggish for the wait for SP2! Ugghh! I should have never upgraded this machine!

http://www.news.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html?tag=newsmap

-S

[Skybird]

"Children behave, or I'll install Vista on your game PC!"

"Buhahaaaa, noooooo.... buaahahahaha... no Vista, Mum, pleeeeeease!"

[Sea Demon]

I thought MS was giving up on Vista.

[TteFAboB]

But Chock said you can set FSX's Auto-gen scenery to max on Vista while it's very difficult to do the same on XP.

[Konovalov]

My copy of XP never tasted so good. :smug:

[SUBMAN1]

But Chock said you can set FSX's Auto-gen scenery to max on Vista while it's very difficult to do the same on XP.I am detecting MS trickery on this one to sell Vista - similar to what they did to Crysis, until people learned to hack it.

-S

[STEED]

My copy of XP never tasted so good. :smug:

Yummy Fish flavor. :D

[Carotio]

This post made me search for XP SP3 and I found this page:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx

There I could read this:
SP3 for Windows XP Home Edition is currently planned for 1H CY2008. This date is preliminary.

"1H CY2008" <- what does this mean?

[antikristuseke]

That means fist half of (cy im guessing means church year, not to sure about that) 2008

[Carotio]

Okay, thanks!

Just wasn't sure...
Isn't the normal way to write it is AD instead of CY ?
AD = Anno Domino (Year of the Lord)

[Prof]

I would have thought that 'CY' meant 'Calendar Year', much like 'FY' means 'Financial Year' or 'MY', when referring to vehicles, means 'Model Year'.

[The WosMan]

I wouldn't be surprised if SP3 for XP breaks something on XP which would force a user to consider buying Shista. I will wait it out a bit and see what I hear from SP3 users.

[d@rk51d3]

A mate in the industry tells me that XP will only be available for a few more months before sales and support are both canned. Last chance to grab a new XP rig, although I'm sure there will be an XP black market.

With Vista already in the recycle bin, I wonder what M$ have up their sleeves.:hmm:

[SUBMAN1]

A mate in the industry tells me that XP will only be available for a few more months before sales and support are both canned. Last chance to grab a new XP rig, although I'm sure there will be an XP black market.

With Vista already in the recycle bin, I wonder what M$ have up their sleeves.:hmm:Thats not true. They said the same thing about Windows 2000, yet you can still buy and get support for that.

-S

[SUBMAN1]

I wouldn't be surprised if SP3 for XP breaks something on XP which would force a user to consider buying Shista. I will wait it out a bit and see what I hear from SP3 users.Apparently it doesn't. It seems to be mostly be made of all the 200 patches that you would have to DL if installing SP2. As far as adding anything, I did hear a rumor or two, but nothing substantial. Try and install an SP2 sys these days and you will see what I am talking about. SP3 is just going to roll all those headaces up into one simple headache for you.

-S

[d@rk51d3]

:o Windows 2000?

Never seen that offered anywhere. Not in the last 2 - 3 years anyway.

Still, only reporting what I've been told.:up:

[kiwi_2005]

Yeah i read that the SP3 for XP gives a performace boost. Not going to bother with Vista's SP1 tho, my vistas running just how i like it so no need to break it.

[Sea Demon]

Yeah i read that the SP3 for XP gives a performace boost. Not going to bother with Vista's SP1 tho, my vistas running just how i like it so no need to break it.

You seem to be one of the lucky ones then. I've heard some bad stories, mate. :dead:

[kiwi_2005]

I'll tell you whats the worse thing to come out of Microsoft its not Vista or Windows ME even but its the anticopy protection or activation require BS. The user forks out a couple $100 to buy the latest OS installs it on his PC, couple of weeks go by and the honest chap decides to upgrade his hdd installs a nice 500gigbyte loads up vista and hello its locked out. WTF straightaway without even asking if he is, MS has branded him a possible theif by limiting his OS unless he gives them a ring and proves that he brought the OS, if he can't prove it then its bye bye $500.

The pirate DL MS installs adds the no activation fix and bang he can change his hardware 100 times or install on 20 PCS, if he wants and no worries about been given the limit issue. Yet MS made this technique to keep the pirates away but all its done is ZERO - whos it really hurting? The honest user.

Ive read of users so frustrated that they find out about the fix, download & use it. I can understand MS protecting there software but theres got to be a better way. They need to create a CD/dvd that is rock solid when it comes to copying there is no way a pirate will be able to copy from it.

This happened to me the other day i install a new dvd writer and vista takes 15 or so min to load i then get an activation require cause of my hardware change. What the! Get real, I aint got time to talk to someone with broken english, DL fix load vista in safe mode add fix restart vista back to normal. I can blardy well add as many hw changes as i wish and so i should i paid for it! You buy a car you dont head to the car sales manager when you want to put a new engine in it do you?

? What is MS on about ? Stupid.

Either that or DL Linux its FREE

[Kazuaki Shimazaki II]

Ive read of users so frustrated that they find out about the fix, download & use it. I can understand MS protecting there software but theres got to be a better way. They need to create a CD/dvd that is rock solid when it comes to copying there is no way a pirate will be able to copy from it.

Fundamentally impossible. There will be a phase where the data is unencrypted and running and the pirates can leech off that phase. Anyway, the more sophisticated and effective the copy protection, the more likely it'll start conflicting (e.g. StarForce) with honest users, or even dishonest users who nevertheless bought this software honestly - bet they won't do that after a StarForce conflict.

[SUBMAN1]

:o Windows 2000?

Never seen that offered anywhere. Not in the last 2 - 3 years anyway.

Still, only reporting what I've been told.:up:It is easy to find online, but for legitimacy, here is Microsoft - they are still selling it themselves:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/professional/howtobuy/pricing/default.mspx

-S