Log in

View Full Version : America, don't let your pants down!


The Avon Lady
09-05-07, 12:50 AM
How Many Lawyers Does It Take to Sink the U.S. Navy? (http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/052guyna.asp?pg=1)

:nope: :nope: :nope:

3Jane
09-05-07, 04:07 AM
So, nations should only resort to the rule of law. In this case the rule of international law. If the use of force is unavalable. Anyone surprised by that line of thought. No, me neither.

Skybird
09-05-07, 04:41 AM
Don't like the haughty tone and sometimes even suggestive language this essay is written in.

Jimbuna
09-05-07, 04:46 AM
Totally confused as to why the Americans should want to relinquish their advantage whilst being in a position of strength :hmm:

The Avon Lady
09-05-07, 04:58 AM
Don't like the haughty tone and sometimes even suggestive language this essay is written in.
Then you can let your pants down. :smug:

:D

Skybird
09-05-07, 05:00 AM
Typical women - always thinking of just one thing...

The Avon Lady
09-05-07, 05:04 AM
Typical women - always thinking of just one thing...
The latest fashion! :hmm:

P_Funk
09-05-07, 05:11 AM
Ah yes the classic flouting of international law. Notice the repetition of "unsympathetic" in many sentences. This isn't asserting that a moral falsehood is borne by those that might rule against the US, but instead implies a position which doesnt not allow said parties to acknowledge the US's behavior as necessary for whatever ends are to be justified by the neverending geo-political impertaives laid out by the US's foreign policy. Morality interestingly enough never enters into it, nor does legality. I find it quite hilarious that he mentions the international court case about Nicaragua, as if its a travesty that the US would be found guilty of that. Amazing the way this guys thinks.

This about sums it up.

The point isn't that we should try to shoot our way out of any future disputes about our rights on the seas. The United States has a great stake in upholding general rules of restraint on the high seas, both to protect our own ocean-borne commerce and to reassure others that we can use our power wisely. But in a crisis or a special case, where national security seems to require some exception to the general rule, do we want to leave ourselves dependent on permission from some international body?
Does anyone notice that apparently everything the US does at the UN is an exception to the rule?

Jimbuna
09-05-07, 05:26 AM
Does anyone notice that apparently everything the US does at the UN is an exception to the rule?

Could it have anything to do with the fact that not only do they own the building, but they also bankrole everything it needs to exist ? :hmm:

The Avon Lady
09-05-07, 05:31 AM
Does anyone notice that apparently everything the US does at the UN is an exception to the rule?
""It is better to be making the news than taking it."
- Winston Churchill

"Some Europeans have never lost faith in appeasement as a way of life."
- John Bolton, former US Ambassador to the UN

P_Funk
09-05-07, 05:42 AM
"The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit."
W. Somerset Maugham
"Some for renown, on scraps of learning dote,
And think they grow immortal as they quote."
Edward Young

The Avon Lady
09-05-07, 05:47 AM
"The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit."
W. Somerset Maugham
"Some for renown, on scraps of learning dote,
And think they grow immortal as they quote."
Edward Young


*cough*
Pot. Kettle. Black.
*cough*

"The quotations when engraved upon the memory give you good thoughts."
- Winston Churchill

The Avon Lady
09-05-07, 05:52 AM
The farce and disgrace that is today's United Nations was much discussed in this thread:

The World's Worst Organization (http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=97473)

And so many other threads.

P_Funk
09-05-07, 04:22 PM
Will you stop at nothing AL to avoid making a direct argument?

And yes I KNOW its the pot calling the kettle black (haven't you molested that turn of phrase enough? Please it needs a break) that was the whole idea. I can't believe I'm explaining the definition of irony to someone that loves Churchill quotes...

Tchocky
09-05-07, 04:38 PM
http://shelleytherepublican.com/uploaded_images/potsmokingliberal.jpg

http://www.global-b2b-network.com/direct/dbimage/50337345/Electric_Kettle.jpg

http://blogmeisterusa.mu.nu/archives/0_21_120405_sharpton.jpg

Ah, I'm hungry.

Lets get a taco.

Zayphod
09-06-07, 01:06 PM
So, nations should only resort to the rule of law. In this case the rule of international law. If the use of force is unavalable. Anyone surprised by that line of thought. No, me neither.

Where exactly IS Gort when we need him?
Someone has to keep all these kids in line.

kiwi_2005
09-06-07, 02:36 PM
The 1960's equals CIA connects man! call me paranioa but hey i can't help it i just watched "The Good Sheperd" :lol: Matt damon played it well, even if he looked a bit to ridget!

Heibges
09-06-07, 10:57 PM
With a title like that, I though the thread would be about Senator Craig.

The Avon Lady
09-06-07, 11:08 PM
With a title like that, I though the thread would be about Senator Craig.
Here ya go, sonny (http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=121357)! ;)