Log in

View Full Version : Gonzo Gone


Tchocky
08-27-07, 10:31 AM
Another rat off the sinking ship, it seems :p

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6965602.stm

The Avon Lady
08-27-07, 10:38 AM
COOL!
http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/6462/gonzosp8.jpg

SUBMAN1
08-27-07, 11:07 AM
COOL!
http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/6462/gonzosp8.jpg

You beat me to posting this picture! Uggh!

geetrue
08-27-07, 02:07 PM
All this means is that things go on behind closed doors that we don't
understand ... without knowledge you can not understand and without
understanding you can not have wisdom.

The attorney general did not fire those eight people on his own ... he didn't
just wake up one day and decide to fire 8 democrats ...
someone else in the cabinet did.

Gonzales did a poor job of protecting that information and now he has to pay
for being part of the solution.

Someone else's solution that is.

Here's the Time's article: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1656544,00.html

SUBMAN1
08-27-07, 02:10 PM
All this means is that things go on behind closed doors that we don't
understand ... without knowledge you can not understand and without
understanding you can not have wisdom.

The attorney general did not fire those eight people on his own ... he didn't
just wake up one day and decide to fire 8 democrats ...
someone else in the cabinet did.

Gonzales did a poor job of protecting that information and now he has to pay
for being part of the solution.

Someone else's solution that is.

Here's the Time's article: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1656544,00.html
The real problem is, these democrats are just the latest. Every administration has fired and replaced attorneys. This is not a new thing. It just is all hyped up this time around. Its annoying to watch the news lately.

-S

waste gate
08-27-07, 02:29 PM
I thought all the prosecutors that were terminated were Bush appointees to begin with, is that not the case?

SUBMAN1
08-27-07, 02:37 PM
I thought all the prosecutors that were terminated were Bush appointees to begin with, is that not the case?
I don't think so, but I don't know for sure.

-S

PS. Most lawyers are democrats anyway by the way.

waste gate
08-27-07, 02:45 PM
This whole thing could and should have been handled more effectively. Gonzalez should have told congress that the US Attorneys were hired for political reasons and terminated for political reasons. Both are true statements and both can be defended constitutionally. End of story.

All Presidential appointees work at the pleasure of POTUS. Congress's only role is advice and consent during the approval process.

geetrue
08-27-07, 03:00 PM
This whole thing could and should have been handled more effectively. Gonzalez should have told congress that the US Attorneys were hired for political reasons and terminated for political reasons. Both are true statements and both can be defended constitutionally. End of story.

All Presidential appointees work at the pleasure of POTUS. Congress's only role is advice and consent during the approval process.

Yes, I agree, but someone advised Gonzalez to do what he did, before, during and after his appearance before Congress.

That advisor is probably no longer with the cabinet either ... know what I mean jelly bean?

waste gate
08-27-07, 03:13 PM
This whole thing could and should have been handled more effectively. Gonzalez should have told congress that the US Attorneys were hired for political reasons and terminated for political reasons. Both are true statements and both can be defended constitutionally. End of story.

All Presidential appointees work at the pleasure of POTUS. Congress's only role is advice and consent during the approval process.

Yes, I agree, but someone advised Gonzalez to do what he did, before, during and after his appearance before Congress.

That advisor is probably no longer with the cabinet either ... know what I mean jelly bean?

I know exactly who you mean. I just don't understand why that approach was taken.(??) A piece of the puzzle is missing.

EDIT: I wonder how John Ashcroft plays into the mix?

Iceman
08-27-07, 03:58 PM
Another rat off the sinking ship, it seems :p

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6965602.stm

Maybe look at the whole picture a little more before passing sentence there chief...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales

don't send him to the chair yet there damn...looks like he "May" have actually have had some good intentions as I really believe anyone who would serve in public office would have had, to have some sort of conscience and care about they're country....

and it's "Tchocky" with the first stone...next.

SUBMAN1
08-27-07, 04:06 PM
This whole thing could and should have been handled more effectively. Gonzalez should have told congress that the US Attorneys were hired for political reasons and terminated for political reasons. Both are true statements and both can be defended constitutionally. End of story....
Now there's the caveat - A lawyer must do what he believes when being prosecutor without threat of his actions being used against him politically and without the threat of his job at stake. So no, Gonzalez can't say that.

-S

waste gate
08-27-07, 05:02 PM
This whole thing could and should have been handled more effectively. Gonzalez should have told congress that the US Attorneys were hired for political reasons and terminated for political reasons. Both are true statements and both can be defended constitutionally. End of story....
Now there's the caveat - A lawyer must do what he believes when being prosecutor without threat of his actions being used against him politically and without the threat of his job at stake. So no, Gonzalez can't say that.

-S

That certainly is the line of the Democrats in congress and the fired US attorneys after the fact, but it is not reality.
How does a political appointee stay above the politics of the job? An example is illegal aliens. Why don't US Attorneys prosecute the mayor/city council of every 'sanctuary city'? Their policies break federal law and they know it. Politics comes into play.

My feeling is that you either uphold all federal law or you uphold the laws your boss deams appropriate. The problem is that congress in its zeal to look like it is meaningful enacts so many laws that the executive branch has no choice but to pick and choose enforcement.

Here is an idea; for every federal law passed by congress two must be removed. In the beginning this will be a simple matter but eventually real decisions will have to be made and congress will be forced to be more beholden to the people who elected them.

Skybird
08-27-07, 05:19 PM
the slow death of the muppets show.

Tchocky
08-27-07, 06:43 PM
I gotta stop sending my posts to the Guardian for proofreading

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michael_tomasky/2007/08/sinking_ship_leaves_rat.html

Enigma
08-27-07, 09:32 PM
So, all those top level DOJ personell that stepped down, resigned etc over this all did it for nothing? :roll:



1) Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, today.
2) Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty announced (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003215.php) his resignation May 14th.
3) Acting Associate Attorney General William Mercer (the Department's #3) announced (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003511.php) that he was withdrawing his nomination for the position June 22nd.
4) Kyle Sampson, Gonzales' chief of staff, resigned (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002748.php) March 13th.
5) Department White House liaison Monica Goodling resigned (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002966.php) April 6th.
6) Michael Elston, McNulty's chief of staff, resigned (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003450.php) June 15th.
7) Executive Director of the Executive Office of United States Attorneys Michael Battle, announced (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/Battle%20mid%20February,%20http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002679.php) his resignation in mid-February.
8) Bradley Schlozman, an attorney in the Counsel to the Director staff at the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, formerly the U.S. attorney for Kansas City and a former acting assistant attorney for the Civil Rights Division, resigned (http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003959.php) mid August.





All because Gonzo did nothing wrong. all these folks resigned because of a Democratic with hunt. :roll:

August
08-27-07, 11:27 PM
I don't recall such a ballyhoo when Clintons AG, Janet Reno fired all 93 federal prosecutors just because they were Regan appointees.

bookworm_020
08-28-07, 01:24 AM
Nice work AL, let me know when Elmo decides to call it quits!:roll:

Iceman
08-28-07, 02:45 AM
ballyhoo

Just had to take note of that saying...lol ballyhoo... :hmm:

The Avon Lady
08-28-07, 03:06 AM
Nice work AL, let me know when Elmo decides to call it quits!:roll:
Worse (http://img463.imageshack.us/img463/3872/elmoxl4.jpg)! :dead:

bradclark1
08-28-07, 07:56 AM
I don't recall such a ballyhoo when Clintons AG, Janet Reno fired all 93 federal prosecutors just because they were Regan appointees.
Through his testimony before Congress on issues ranging from the Patriot Act to U.S. Attorney firings, he commonly admitted ignorance. He was either continually lying or he was stupid. Both are reason for getting rid of.

August
08-28-07, 10:13 AM
I don't recall such a ballyhoo when Clintons AG, Janet Reno fired all 93 federal prosecutors just because they were Reagan appointees. Through his testimony before Congress on issues ranging from the Patriot Act to U.S. Attorney firings, he commonly admitted ignorance. He was either continually lying or he was stupid. Both are reason for getting rid of.

Maybe but it was for the firings that Congress put him on the hot seat, so why are 8 Dem prosecutors more important than 93 Rep prosecutors?

bradclark1
08-28-07, 12:11 PM
Maybe but it was for the firings that Congress put him on the hot seat, so why are 8 Dem prosecutors more important than 93 Rep prosecutors?
He had been on the hot seat for awhile. Lying about his roll in the firings was the final straw not the firings itself. When you loose all credibility and your staff resigns you show your organization is dysfunctional and is more of a liability then a help. You don't deserve a position of trust.
My opinion? Gonzalez lost sight of being the Attorney General for the United States of America and became just Bush's attorney.

Enigma
08-28-07, 10:21 PM
The "firings" are just what the right keeps bringing up a the reason for the hearings, etc. you listen to memebers of the over seeing panel, from the right and the left, they all say that Gonzo was a terrible AG, the DOJ was paralyzed, and he should step down.

Officerpuppy
08-29-07, 12:56 AM
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b344/Officerpuppy_/Other/News.jpg