US less certain on Northkorean uranium program

[Skybird]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801977.html

It's a crying shame, what has become of the "imminent threats" these days...

[The Avon Lady]

Interesting but too early to decide what and whom to believe.

This should keep the blogosphere busy for a month!

In fact, here we go (http://www.dprkstudies.org/2007/03/01/lies-damn-lies-and-newspaper-articles-on-nk-heu/)! :roll: After reading that article, I feel I can say that I'm not the "average reader" that sucks up everything a WaPo reporter pours in my trough. :nope:

[Skybird]

The point is that conclusions on an uranium cycle does not necessarily allow to be carried over to assumptions concerning plutonium-dependant weaponry. even if the new info is true, it does not mean that Nk is harmless. It also means that that the scale of current threats has ben exaggerated, and that there is more time.