Log in

View Full Version : GWX First Impressions


HEMISENT
01-04-07, 09:43 PM
This was posted at WAW forums earlier in the week, it was relatively well received so I thought I'd bring it over.

Now that all the dust has settled and GWX has been out for short while I finally returned from Patrol 13 and settled down this weekend and plugged in GWX plus an assortment of mods. I've been reading all the trials and tribulations here at Subsim so I went into this with a pretty good idea of what to expect. For the record I have been mostly a mod tester for quite a number of different mods out there, made up by a whole lot of immensely more talented individuals than myself.

Here are my first impressions, you can take them or leave them:
Starting with the required fresh install + patch I found that the GWX exe. program runs flawlessly. I was expecting a bit of trouble judging by what a number of users at the forums have reported. This was not the case. I believe most of these install problems stem from either NOT uninstalling/reinstalling SH3 (laziness?)or NOT deleting the SH3 folder in my doc's. Seems that historically this has been the case for all the major mods.

My current NYGM friendly SH3 Commander 2.7 is so loaded with different random and dates files I chose to simply rename it and park it elsewhere for safe keeping. I'll gradually bring things over later. I DL'd a fresh Commander 2.7 and installed it into the UBI folder. Inserting the four "GWX Only" CFG files into Commander I set up a career, hit launch and again everything worked as advertised. *Note* GWX comes with Jscones' JSGME mod enabler already packaged-cool.

Loading SH3 with GWX is almost like watching paint dry-long and boring. I did not install the optional Das Boot intro film as this only adds to the pain, interesting as it may be. Once loaded, a new career entered, the game now takes a similiar excruciatingly long amount of time to load. My computer is not an ultra high line model nor is it a bottom of the barrel junkyard dog. I think I'm pretty much in the of middle of the road or a bit better. Comparing the two mods-GWX simply is so full of stuff it takes awhile- it's a fact of life-I'll have get over it.

For testing purposes I have all the difficulty options checked except for outside view(f12) and nav map updates. No event cam, manual targeting enabled, etc, etc. And yes, for testing I even have the stealth meter turned on.

For me, the first impression is that of a lot of lagging and jumping. The boat starts in port at St Nazaire 1942 (it's my home port as I'm assigned to 7 Flottille) and immediately moving the free cam or even the bridge view is difficult. NYGM is smooth and virtually effortless. GWX at first, is choppy with a lot of lags. Again, it's my computer and my graphics card, everyone will be getting a different experience. There are simply so many ships, boats, planes, sailing boats etc, etc. The port, it seems, is much busier. GWX comes with an optional Harbor Traffic Lite file for just this scenario. I've not installed it yet, however I've played NYGM in the later war period with air raids going on and I can envision things coming to a complete standstill with GWX-I need to either update something or reduce the workload.

At this stage of the game, aside from the lag everything is similiar. In the crew management screen-I've gotten used to the reduced crew levels and very little of the ugly green health bar showing. In GWX the full crew is back along with the bar (more on this later).The nav map shows the boat icon with the 360deg targeting circle around it. This is a matter of choice. I'm used to NYGM and nothing but a dot for the boat's location so it seems a bit busy-not bad just different.

The pull down menus and movable chronometer are there, the namograph is now gone. The torpedo's can be set to impact or magnetic vs. NYGM magnetic setting only. The pop out guages menu still pops out from the lower left as it should. The map labeling is different. GWX uses a different font and size for labeling, I don't like it much, however the Indian Ocean is modelled. I can live with the fonts until I figure out how to combine the two. In the grand scheme of things I guess I can live with it if I have to.

I noticed that the boat tends to rock and roll in the gentle swells a whole lot more. Never mind the rough weather. I purposely stayed surfaced and engaged a couple fighters in 6m seas. In NYGM the the gunsights are relatively stable, tracking the planes was no problem, with GWX it's a whole new feeling. The gunsight is forever swaying, bobbing up and down and rocking to and fro, good luck even seeing the plane never mind hitting the damned thing. A very positive experience and one I enjoyed immensely.

A lot has been said here at Subsim about the GWX night being TOO dark. It is. No question about it. People have complained about not seeing anything but pitch black out at sea. They're right, you can't. Here's what I found out. If I turned "All" the lights in the room off, then turn the lower guage panel off leaving simply a full dark night screen on the monitor after awhile my eyes adjusted and I could make out smoke on the distant horizon, I don't mean 16km away but I could see outlines and shapes out to 4-5 km with no problem. I guess this comes down to personal preferance and monitor settings. Everyone has a diffent set up and everyone plays differently. At the end of it all I like this, it just "seems" more realistic to me. Personally I like to attack convoys on the surface at night in stormy weather. My boat takes a huge beating everytime but I get a kick out of it. The acid test for me will be the GWX night vision in a stormy night-Haven't run into that yet this weekend but hope springs eternal.

As far as AI visual detection goes, I did a lot of NYGM testing awhile ago on the distances a U boat would be detected by the AI in various sea states, weather conditions and deck heights-I think it was evolved from the theory that running decks awash actually was modelled in NYGM. My tests proved that it did make a huge difference. I approached a convoy in daylight, from the back in very heavy seas. I was able to slide between two escorts both 4000m to port and stbd before I was detected. Of course once they found me they called a few friends and killed me. I saved the game and ran this a couple times with similiar results. Again, same as in NYGM your profile and sea state makes all the difference. The acid test for me will be night time detection levels in nasty weather. So far I'm very pleased with this aspect of GWX.

The damage repair times in GWX simply reek(my opinion) I've never really liked the damage times in NYGM but they were better than vanilla. I've gone out and intentionally gotten hit by DC's and AC fire, I even lowered my boat on top of a mine in St Nazaire. The GWX game "it seems" in this regard has reverted back to stock vanilla. I cannot say what or what not has been modified but comparing the two, NYGM is definately better-still lame but better. Damage repair times are one of my hot buttons and I bitch endlessly about this-no one listens but that's irrelevant.

As for AI evasion and detectability underwater. I really see no difference between the two. The same tactics that work in NYGM seem to work in GWX. I cannot find one to be more or less difficult than the other. Again, everyone plays differently, everyone's expectations are different. For me, I'm ok with this aspect of GWX, for now at least.

I just completed a single mission in which I fired a salvo of four against a carrier in the middle of a slow convoy. Upon seeing my fish (G7a's) heading for it, the carrier increased speed and cut the rudder hard to port to evade. The first three missed but number four hit the ship in the stern which caused the carrier to immediately lose way. Using the outside view (f12) I found all three screws stopped. I figured I would go deep and evade then reload and sink her. As I was being trounced by multiple DD's the carrier fired up all three screws and with rudder cranked a few degrees to port took off away from the convoy along with two escorts. I never saw this happen before. I've blown off screws and rudders completely but never caused one to jamb. Using free cam the ship continued on making a lazy turn to port off into the distance. GWX or stock behavior- I don't know but it was neat.

My huge and overactive ego comes into play here. I'm pleased to report that the GWX team did not feel the need to completely rewrite the Sabotage & Malfunctions or Thermal Layers mods. They're still included in SH3 Commander and both work as advertised, although now the player has the option of enabling or disabling their use.

One thing that bugs me is: In NYGM the player's boat would gradually sink when sitting still. It was called the anti-hummingbird mod and there was a lot of back and forth pro's and con's which I won't go anywhere near in this. Bottom line is if you sat still your boat sank very, very slowly(slight negative bouyancy). If you interrupted a crash dive then your boat would behave funny and be difficult to trim at slow speeds. Enter GWX, If the player's boat is travelling at 1kt or less your boat will gradually rise(slight positive bouyancy). Both mods claim this to be factual, both claim historical precedent but having never been on a WWII era sub I cannot say which is right. Again with one mod you sink gradually and with another you rise-gradually.

Ok, so much for my impressions on the straight, out of the box GWX. I had enabled the "supplied," GWX approved 16km Atmosphere, Officer Icons, LateWar Sensors, Special Effects and English Map and Grids mods. I added a couple eye candy mods but I also plugged in Nvdrifter's Longer Repair Times(LRT) mod-Drifter came out with a version specifically for GWX so I tried it. HUGE DIFFERENCE. I put the boat intentionally in harms way and took serious hits. I even sat down on the same mine in port. My damage times increased from minutes or seconds to hours and hours. There was some talk about the original mod screwing up some portions of GWX, hence the new and improved "Lite" for GWX only. So far works great. Oh, before I forget, using the LRT mod gets rid of those green health bars in the crew compartments. *Note, at this time I have no idea if the LITE version messes up GWX, as of right now, all seems normal. Caveat Emptor!

I guess the bottom line for me is I like it a lot. GW used to be known as an "eye candy" only mod. I don't think that's the case anymore. A bunch of new ships, new planes, a whole lot of new sounds for sure, but so far I think the AI work and the "difficulty" we're all looking for now exists in GWX.

If anyone finds this useful or interesting I'll be glad to add my further testing results and impressions here. If not just tell me and I'll go away. The powers that be have approved it for WAW so I'll be using on the next patrol.

http://wolvesatwar.org/radioroom/Themes/classic/images/icons/modify_inline.gif

Nippelspanner
01-04-07, 10:35 PM
Nice review... I like your "neutral" point of view - rare in this Forum :lol:

Just play GWX a few more Patrols, you will see...
I was sunk for the 3rd time now. with my last career i was in 1942, Patrol#4 and I found wonderful things in just those 4 patrols... dolphins in a fjord (maybe not quite realistic because of the cold water!?), fire ships, sailing boats, "virtual" wolfpacks/other subs (very "das boot" like), nice/new convoys and I even listened to a submarine which attacked(!) a convoy and sunk a ship... but it was destroyed later by gunfire - just heard it through the hydrophone, wasnt able to take a look -> 100% (never again without ext. cam!)

there is so much in GWX, you will need time to discover (and luck!)

Ducimus
01-04-07, 10:49 PM
Fair review. How's the overall WaW crowd liking GWX anyway?

Also Has me wondering if i should script down my "flavored to taste" mod and direct it to the NYGM crowd, as some of the elements he mentioned i also like and imported into GWX. Of course is easy to go through that compilation and delete the crap you don't like too.

VonHelsching
01-04-07, 11:31 PM
Great review, Hemisent. I just want to enhance one of your points about nvdrifter's long repair mod (LRT). If GWX users want to install this mod, they should use the "Lite" version (which is no "light" at all, btw :lol:), because this version does not break the Long Range Gunnery Mod, which I consider one of the most important aspects of GWX.

Von

JScones
01-05-07, 02:19 AM
Good review!

My huge and overactive ego comes into play here. I'm pleased to report that the GWX team did not feel the need to completely rewrite the Sabotage & Malfunctions or Thermal Layers mods. They're still included in SH3 Commander and both work as advertised, although now the player has the option of enabling or disabling their use.
:o Rewrite your work? You gotta be kidding. :up:

In fact, the only changes made were:

a) updating the sensor.dat hex offsets to work with GWX's modified version of the file;

b) removing the Fumo 391 settings to ensure compatibility with the Late War Sensors mod.

I made it a selectable option in SH3Cmdr as my wife made a comment about me going prematurely bald. ;)

nvdrifter
01-05-07, 02:54 AM
Great review, Hemisent. I just want to enhance one of your points about nvdrifter's long repair mod (LRT). If GWX users want to install this mod, they should use the "Lite" version (which is no "light" at all, btw :lol:), because this version does not break the Long Range Gunnery Mod, which I consider one of the most important aspects of GWX.

Von
Just so everyone knows, neither the Lite nor regular version of LRT 1.31 breaks the Long Range Gunnery mod in GWX. The previous version did, but that was thankfully corrected in v1.31 ;)

AS
01-05-07, 07:51 AM
Is there another way to download this mod? I don´t get access to filefront (always denies my request, that lousy bastard)

Cheers, AS

azn_132
01-05-07, 08:18 AM
Is there another way to download this mod? I don´t get access to filefront (always denies my request, that lousy bastard)

Cheers, AS
Keep pressin the refresh button.

HEMISENT
01-05-07, 08:30 AM
Thanks for the kind words guys here's some addl posts from WAW.

One question put to me earlier this week at the WAW forum was:
Does GWX also recreate random running depth variances? I don't believe it does, which is strike two in my book.

My answer;
I just went into the NYGM files and found the dials.cfg which control the randomised depth settings. I'm going to bring them over to GWX and see what happens. Funny thing tho- they exist up to feb 28 1942 with an 80% probability. On a recent NYGM patrol I experienced numerous depth issues, some firing at a static target in port and the date was late 42-odd.
Later;
Good news on this...so far at least. I copied the Dials.cfg out of the NYGM randomised events cfg file and plugged them into the GWX randomised events cfg. at the top, right above the TL files.
First I ran a couple baseline tests with stock GWX- Dec 1941, static ship in harbor, U boat dead stop, calm seas. Using the outside view and observing point of impact it seems like all torpedo's run straight, hot and true.
Then, using the exact same mission, only launching with SH3 Commander and allowing it to issue random files, shooting at the same target:
test 1, 4 fired, 1 impact 3 run low
test 2, 4 fired, 2 impact 2 run low
test 3, 4 fired, 1 impact 2 run low 1 dud
test 4, 4 fired, 0 impact 4 run low
(this pretty closely mirrors the given percentages)

I then ran the exact same test 1 year later and all eels ran normal as the random dates expire Feb 1942. As it stands, at least for me anyway, I think this concern regarding GWX has been answered.
This does nothing to change the settings switch itself. The player must still manually set the detonation mode. Impact or Magnetic, however a fish set on magnetic will still detonate on impact if I'm not mistaken.
_______________________
Some more feedback guys.
Ok , I finally got into a scrape that I wasn't looking for(sort of). Off the north west coast of England waiting for a convoy to head out. In very rough seas, during daylight metox warned me of a radar contact heading in my direction. I stayed surfaced to see what would happen. A Fletcher DD(I think) with a very different paint scheme came sniffing around. Finally at about 4300m he was able to catch sight of my boat and the chase was on. I turned tail and ran thru the seas at Flank speed. At 4000m he began firing his fwd guns. My boat took one round to the fwd torpedo compartment and before pulling the plug I let loose a TIII acoustic in his direction(about 3800m range). The torpedo did it's job, tracked right to the source of the noise and blew off both props. 45minutes (yes, real time they were unuseable) later the bow torpedo tubes were repaired and ready, we went to pd. The DD had been sitting there now for nearly an hour showing slightly down at the stern. I manuevered the boat to within 700m and put a g7e into him below the stacks. Ship broke in two and slowly went down. Once the boat disappeared I resumed course, increased speed and ordered surface. No sooner than the tower broke the surface we began taking damage. I immediately ordered CD and used the f12 key to see a Sunderland had just mg'd us. Apparently the DD had called for help, turns out we surfaced right under the plane. The damage reports said the the wintergarden and flak guns required 31 hours, the fwd deck another 3+ hrs and the control room and main pump over 3 hrs. By moving qualified, fresh men around I got the zentrale fixed in 48 minutes. I surfaced the boat 1 1/2 hrs later to find ac still circling the area and had to cd once again under a pair of twin engine planes which were unfamiliar.

Ok, after playing this since the weekend, this action is basically no different(aside from the drastically better repair times) than one which I've become accustomed to in NYGM. The sights and sounds make it a whole lot more interesting but as far as difficulty goes, I see no difference.
As for the gradual positive bouyancy thing, yes the boat does rise ever so slowly, however it never brakes the surface and it takes awhile before you notice it, certainly more than a minute or so. For some reason the boat stops rising at between 15 and 20 meters. One odd thing I experienced was that in the GWX model, when the player sets a depth manually-say 20m the boat will stop at 2-3 meters less. Don't know why but it does. If you want a desired depth you must add 2-3 m to be sure-odd but not a deal breaker. Overall, after four days of this I'm pretty impressed. I'm looking forward to P14.

ReallyDedPoet
01-05-07, 08:40 AM
In the old days I would do a patrol in a night, TC to the patrol grid, storm into a convoy get some kills then back to port.

With GWX and all the extra stuff ( including many more air attacks ), and the fact that it is much harder ( you can't storm into a convoy, if you do your toast ), it makes it a much better and realistic game. Much more thought has to go into the decisions you make. When GWX first came out I tried to play like I did in the past ( started in 42' ) and did not last long. It wasn't the game as much as my crappy play.

I started in 39, now into 40 ( March ) patroling in the North Sea, and feel like for the first time I playing a sub sim like it is meant to be experienced and played. Yes there are still flaws in the game, but the modders out there have done much to improve and enhance the experience.

To the GWX Team, my hats off to you.

HEMISENT
01-05-07, 08:46 AM
Fair review. How's the overall WaW crowd liking GWX anyway?
A few are using it but DTB has been very heavily involved in WAW for a long long time. I think there's a sense of loyalty but also the fact that the longer term players are just "used" to the way NYGM plays out. There are some posts showing up using GWX so I think that it will spread. The biggest thing is to dispel the notion that GWX in NOT an eye candy mod.
It's not, WE know it, but the common perception is perhaps different.
WAW does a truly magnificent job of putting imersion into the game-A lot of people there are really die hards (I must admit I'm a recent convert and cannot speak highly enough). Anyway, this is just my take on the subject.


Rewrite your work? You gotta be kidding. [IMG]In fact, the only changes made were:

a) updating the sensor.dat hex offsets to work with GWX's modified version of the file;

b) removing the Fumo 391 settings to ensure compatibility with the Late War Sensors mod.

Yup. The TL mod in NYGM is no longer anywhere remotely resembling the original. I know what to look for and when testing it in NYGM it's virtually disabled.
Malfunctions has been changed around quite a bit also, don't know why. But this explains why I have gotten some very odd PM's inquiring about things I have no control over nor answers for. When I PM'd Kpt Lehman earlier he graciously sent me the GWX randomised CFG files proving that the original work was still intact. I am NOT, repeat NOT bashing the NYGM crew here. They had to have their reasons for making their package work to fit their goals.
I love NYGM and am still a fan.

LeafsFan
01-05-07, 09:18 AM
Nice review!!

HB

Dowly
01-05-07, 09:39 AM
Great review there, Hemisent! :up:

I´ve seen pretty much negative feedback about the GWX´s positive bouyancy compared to the NYGM´s negative. AFAIK, DTB himself said once that the uboats bouyance was always trimmed to be slightly positive, but they couldnt model it at that moment.

Anyways, I hope to see WaW 'even out' again after the NYGM only days. ;)

AVGWarhawk
01-05-07, 09:41 AM
Excellent review! I totally agree on the AI and the challenge they provide:up:. I never really considered getting rid of the green bar for crew. Interesting thought but then again when to know when they are tired. I cannot ask them!!!:hmm:

HEMISENT
01-05-07, 10:43 AM
Great review there, Hemisent!
I´ve seen pretty much negative feedback about the GWX´s positive bouyancy compared to the NYGM´s negative.

Actually, I was negative too at first, probably because I was so "used" to the NYGM version. After awhile it's something I'm getting accustomed to. Not bad or anything just different.

Anyways, I hope to see WaW 'even out' again after the NYGM only days.

I think this will happen over time. as I said GW had the reputation for being "all eye candy", perhaps, with enough people writing positive revues about GWX things will gradually even out. Keep in mind tho that the WAW players are pretty much into history and difficulty. Definately not for arcade style playing.


Excellent review! I totally agree on the AI and the challenge they provide. I never really considered getting rid of the green bar for crew. Interesting thought but then again when to know when they are tired. I cannot ask them!!!

For me personally, I liked the "reduced" crew in NYGM. Whether or not this would mess up the LRT LITE mod I don't know. Also, I like the small green "health" bar(or none at all), I'd also like to get rid of the big red exclamation point when the crewmember gets too low(the little green NYGM bar worked for me) All these are just little insignificant personal tastes-in the grand scheme of things they don't amount to much.

The main thing is that GWX, as big and all encompassing as it is, works pretty much as advertized right out of the box. My hat is truly off to all the folks who contributed and to Kpt Lehman who has to be an organisational genius to pull this off.

AVGWarhawk
01-05-07, 10:45 AM
@Hemisent :up::up::up::up::up:

AS
01-05-07, 10:20 PM
Er...sorry to disturb you again, but do I have to register to download that repair time mod??? Filefront didn´t accept any of my usernames, even weird ones like figures and letters etc.

I WANT THIS MOD!!! Now I go and cry into sleep, so there!

Cheers, AS

HEMISENT
01-05-07, 11:01 PM
Er...sorry to disturb you again, but do I have to register to download that repair time mod??? Filefront didn´t accept any of my usernames, even weird ones like figures and letters etc.

I WANT THIS MOD!!! Now I go and cry into sleep, so there!

Cheers, AS

Not that i'm aware of. I clicked the link right off drifter's post-took me to Filefront then it was right there. I know they ask you to register in upper left corner but I didn't. All I can say is try it again.

theluckyone17
01-06-07, 12:28 AM
Anybody else getting that choppiness, btw? Originally I was only getting it in the harbor, just after starting a patrol. This last saved game I loaded, I was getting it in the bridge view... constant jittery/choppiness. Oddly enough, it doesn't appear to be a usual frame rate issue, since I can pan nice and smoothly with the mouse, and the sliding windows move nice and smooth. Other views are usually fine, but can get some intermittent choppiness depending on what I'm looking at. It shows up the most on the bridge view, however. My GeForce 6200OC (256 MB AGP) ain't the cream of the crop, but it's handled everything SH3 has thrown at it up to this point.

HEMISENT
01-06-07, 05:59 AM
Anybody else getting that choppiness, btw? Originally I was only getting it in the harbor, just after starting a patrol. This last saved game I loaded, I was getting it in the bridge view... constant jittery/choppiness. Oddly enough, it doesn't appear to be a usual frame rate issue, since I can pan nice and smoothly with the mouse, and the sliding windows move nice and smooth. Other views are usually fine, but can get some intermittent choppiness depending on what I'm looking at. It shows up the most on the bridge view, however. My GeForce 6200OC (256 MB AGP) ain't the cream of the crop, but it's handled everything SH3 has thrown at it up to this point.

I've experienced that too but generally when in port, in very stormy weather and near a convoy-in other words when there's a lot going on.
Only happens (to me) under heavy load. Like I said earlier I think I'm due to upgrade a bit 'cause I sure as hell ain't giving this up.

Hartmann
01-06-07, 06:21 PM
Anybody else getting that choppiness, btw? Originally I was only getting it in the harbor, just after starting a patrol. This last saved game I loaded, I was getting it in the bridge view... constant jittery/choppiness. Oddly enough, it doesn't appear to be a usual frame rate issue, since I can pan nice and smoothly with the mouse, and the sliding windows move nice and smooth. Other views are usually fine, but can get some intermittent choppiness depending on what I'm looking at. It shows up the most on the bridge view, however. My GeForce 6200OC (256 MB AGP) ain't the cream of the crop, but it's handled everything SH3 has thrown at it up to this point.

I've experienced that too but generally when in port, in very stormy weather and near a convoy-in other words when there's a lot going on.
Only happens (to me) under heavy load. Like I said earlier I think I'm due to upgrade a bit 'cause I sure as hell ain't giving this up.

I don´t know ,but GWX uses bigger textures in ships, crew skins and other stuff or use the normal SH3 textures.???
perhaps some new graphic cards or poweful and are able to move textures than a older card :hmm:

theluckyone17
01-06-07, 09:51 PM
I could see that happening, actually... the choppiness was happening around the convoy, now that I think about it. And for the first few moments after starting a patrol in the harbor. The harbor choppiness disappears usually after I first start to make way, though. I was hoping the choppiness might disappear, too.

I'll poke around later, maybe. (Is this how modders get started? I'm starting to feel addicted). I don't want to hijack the thread, too ;o)

HEMISENT
01-06-07, 10:46 PM
I could see that happening, actually... the choppiness was happening around the convoy, now that I think about it. And for the first few moments after starting a patrol in the harbor. The harbor choppiness disappears usually after I first start to make way, though. I was hoping the choppiness might disappear, too.

actually it does about 16 - 20 km out of port things smooth out, tc works ok.


I'll poke around later, maybe. (Is this how modders get started? I'm starting to feel addicted). I don't want to hijack the thread, too ;o)

YUP! Better than purple microd.... err' never mind-Join the club

Kpt. Lehmann
01-06-07, 11:15 PM
Just some quick notes:

Harbor areas create a very large FPS hit even in stock SH3... The addition of harbor traffic increases that significantly... However, as someone mentioned above... the choppiness will smooth out a bit as you go. It takes a moment for everything to be rendered. I get the chop too. Once I rotate the bridge cam 360 degress though... it is lessened.

@Hartmann,
Regarding texture sizes in GWX:
In GW we had placed many textures in the texture folder... which as we learned, slows things down as it is an "extra" place that the engine must check for final textures.

In GWX we loaded all possible textures into their home .dat files AFTER ensuring that they are/were NO LARGER than the original stock resolution textures.

In game performance is generally better in GWX than in GW for the reasons stated above... but LOAD TIMES are longer due to the size of the campaign files and shipping/units being tracked by the game.

More than 10,000 such objects are tracked continuously by the game. Those objects are rendered in 3D at roughly 35 kilometers from you in game.

SH3, straight out of the box is generally more "system spec sensitive" it seems to me... than are other games I own that would appear to be the other way round.

If your system is below "recommended" specs you can run into problem areas.

If you keep your system "clean" (defragged/spyware free/external programs shut down etc..) you will generally get better performance.

FYI also, I will be looking into adapting a version of Nvdrifter's Long Repair times version 1.31 Lite for the final Spring update. If you must use an add on for repair times... please use that one. It does not appear to cause any problems with the sensors. Previous versions... though it may not be apparent to the user... cause significant sensor breakage.

irish1958
01-07-07, 11:55 AM
Congratulations Hemisent on a great thread. Since I don't know anyone in my area who plays GWX/SHIII, I really don't get any feedback or other's impressions of the game. I play WaW with both GWX and NYGM mods, and I must confess I like GWX more. However GWX is many months newer and support and development for the NYGM mod appears to have been discontinued. I liked the torpedo malfunctions in NYGM's mod. So far I haven't noticed any in GWX. If there is a random screwup in the function of the torpedoes in GWX, I haven't experienced it as of yet. All my eels appear 100% accurate. I like the longer repair time also. Kpt L, please consider making this an option in the next upgrade of GWX. JSCones: for all your good work, I am sending you a years supply of Rogain. Enjoy!! I hope the developers of SHIV leave a lot for all you talented modelers to do. They might not realize it, but a lot of the sustained interest in this game is because of you. And for all you modelers: "Keep up the Good Work"

bookworm_020
01-07-07, 05:13 PM
Just got to play GWX yesterday for the first time, and I love it! Came across a convoy on my second patrol with a southampton light cruiser, four torps later she went down!

I'm getting lower tonages that I had with vallina SH3, but it makes you truly pleasure the phrase "She's going down!":up:

HEMISENT
01-07-07, 07:05 PM
I liked the torpedo malfunctions in NYGM's mod. So far I haven't noticed any in GWX. If there is a random screwup in the function of the torpedoes in GWX, I haven't experienced it as of yet. All my eels appear 100% accurate.

Thanks for the kind words Irish, I appreciate it. As for the NYGM torpedo screw ups......Guess what? I've got them entered into NYGM and Preliminary testing shows that they work. Did you read this entire post thru from the beginning? So far in my testing at least the random depth setting issue from NYGM is working as it's always done-Playing a WAW patrol right now with it. Will advise once patrol is completed but it's looking good.

irish1958
01-07-07, 10:09 PM
Donke

TarJak
01-07-07, 11:55 PM
Nice review Hemisent.

Speaking of keeping your system clean; over the weekend I happened to be looking at the files in my SH3 installation and found that when using the hi res mods, with screenshots enabled there are some huge files being created each time I hit the Print Screen key to take shots.

I was also running GrabClipSave, but because I hadn't disabled the screen shot feature in the config file for the hi res mod, a .TGA file of aroun 7.5MB was being created each time I hit the key. I also got a .JPG of the same thing that wheighed in at aroun 220kb or so.

So if you have the hi res mod enabled and you take screenies I'd advise you to check your hard disk for files called shotnnnnnn where n represents a number for that shot to clean out.

The other interesting thing that I discovered was that when I opened the .TGA files in photoshop the water was actually transparent, but if I opened the file in GIMP they were properly coloured just like the screen. Saving them using GIMP gave me a size of between 80kb and 120kb depending on the screen res I was using at the time I took the shot, so I've now disabled the .TGA creation in the hi res mod and have gotten back abou 3GB of HDD space that I thought was gone for other reasons.

JScones
01-08-07, 02:54 AM
JSCones: for all your good work, I am sending you a years supply of Rogain.
:rotfl: Thanks mate (had to search first to learn what Rogain was though :oops:).