SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-07-16, 08:12 AM | #1 | |
Born to Run Silent
|
How a Russian Sub Designed to Kill US Carriers Became a Victim of Its Own Arsenal
Quote:
. |
|
11-07-16, 01:42 PM | #2 |
Loader
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cancun, Mexico
Posts: 87
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0
|
In fact no one in the media officially knows what happened to Kursk, why was found a US submarine emergency buoy near the area days after the disaster, why the head of CIA visited Moscow those days and I quote:
"On August 17 the head of the CIA, George Tennet, secretly arrived to Moscow from Sofia, Bulgaria. Shortly after Russian journalists became aware of the visit. Bulgarian officials made no secret of the matter and confirmed that the head of the CIA went to Moscow. When confronted by the journalists, Russian officials stated that the unusual visit was related to the situation in Yugoslavia, and not to the accident aboard "Kursk." On the same day Russian reconnaissance satellites confirmed that a US Los Angeles class submarine entered a naval base in Norway." So, it's possible that the Russian sub, was never victim of their own arsenal, but the arsenal of another one I think it's good to read another theories http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WR...RSK/kursk.html Last edited by jaop99; 11-07-16 at 01:46 PM. Reason: spelling |
11-07-16, 02:38 PM | #3 |
Fleet Admiral
|
It's absolutely no secrets that a country has either a "fishing boat(s)" or a sub nearby when an opponent is conducting military exercises
USS Los Angeles was there to sniff to this exercise and take pictures and do other intelligence surveillance thing, but attack an Russian sub in a time where the relation between these two countries was good ? No. I'm pretty sure that Los Angeles knew what had happened so they send up one of their emergency buoy so the Russian could find their sub-Kursk. Markus |
11-07-16, 06:24 PM | #4 |
Electrician's Mate
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 132
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
I for one find the theory that an American submarine sank the Kursk to be absolutely preposterous. For one thing, the Kursk had one of the best crews in the northern fleet and was commanded by a captain with a very good record. If an American submarine would have attacked, he would have at least attempted an evasion. An oscar II at flank speed makes enough noise the kirov and her escorts, at Asw battlestations for the exercise, would have heard. They also would have ear the sounds of a mark 48 ADcap easily, they arnt quiet fish. And if Russia would have detected an attack on a russian submarine by the US navy, there would have been hell to pay.
Also it is not very likely that a torpedo would have struck kursk in the bow. It is likely that any American submarine would have been in trail and would have fired towards the stern of Kursk. Also kursk would have turned away from the torpedo to evade. Third, I find that the idea of the high test peroxide torpedo caused the incident because after the Kursk incident, the russian navy removed all htp torpedos from all their vessels.
__________________
Americans make better submarines? No my friend, Russia makes better submarines, Americans just make better computers |
11-08-16, 05:26 AM | #5 |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
^ I do not think the idea of a US sub being involved is "preposterous", but i think an aggressive act of any kind is highly unlikely, for all the facts you mentioned.
I could believe in an unintentional collision, but i wonder if a US sub would have got away after such damage, with their one hull construction. And I take it even a shadowing US sub would well keep away from a submarine in a trial area, using sharp weapons. Is there a reason why the bow had to be sawed off, for the raising of the "Kursk"? Danger of exploding torpedoes aside, there were also other missiles and weapons aboard, along with two reactors.
__________________
>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. |
11-08-16, 11:26 AM | #6 |
Watch
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Auray, France
Posts: 28
Downloads: 99
Uploads: 0
|
Well, there are always theories & legends for our submarine realm.
Chances are -for me- that it was the onboard weapon detonation(s). East and West always carry their own version each time, but I mostly remember me and my family being rather angry at the refusal of accepting american help, since there seem to have been a perfect timetable to bring in Western DSRVs if the russian ones were unavailible. Almost anyone feel strong concerns in each day life for sailors stranded at sea, much more underneath it.
__________________
-So what do you do once you heard a new contact ?
-Well, it's an Akula class of the port bow, about 1400 yards away. He just popped over the sound layer and is about to frag our ass. -How do you figured that ? Start reaching for the pile of Subsim stuff. |
11-08-16, 12:35 PM | #7 | |
Gefallen Engel U-666
|
I like the French version the best!
Quote:
__________________
"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe" |
|
11-13-16, 07:29 AM | #8 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
Sorry but the theories surrounding an american submarine firing a live MK48 ADCAP at Kursk well are almost diabolical, the reason being look at the damage and most submariners will tell you that torpedoes are designed to travel under the hull and explode underneath breaking the ships back we have seen this HMAS Farncombe SINKEX for those that remember sub command that was the start up video for the game.
When you look at the damage the hull plating is shaped outwards the explosion came from inside not out, and the damage also affects the starboard front quarter where the torpedo tubes are situated. Could it have been a collision ? No i certainly don't think so again look back to 1992 the Sierra class submarine which is considerably smaller than an Oscar and nearly 10,000 tons lighter in submerged displacement and take a look at the damage that submarine did the the USS Baton Rouge (She was scrapped) Oscar II SSGN is around 18,000 ton displacement and is twice as wide as the 7,000 ton Los Angeles SSN had they have hit even at relatively slow speed the damage to the latter would have been severe likely en-par with the San Francisco i would say. So that does leave the official report? indeed the 65-76 is an old torpedo using old design manufactured in 1976 and is 65cm diameter (hence why its called 65-76 or fat girl to the crew) it does use HTP for its fuel source something the west stopped in the 1950's many accidents have been attributed to this type of design and this is hopefully the latest and last (all 65-76 were removed from service after this) I am highly inclined to believe the official report based on the facts given and having looked into this disaster for over 13 years, the fact Captain Igor Kurdin also agrees with the report gives it some weight (he would know he commanded Yankee and Delta class SSBN's)
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
|
|